This is a Study to Evaluate Nanofractures Technique in the Treatment of Cartilage Lesions

August 5, 2025 updated by: Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Functional Outcome of Nanofractures for the Treatment of Cartilage Lesions

Articular cartilage lesions, with their inherent limited healing potential, remain a challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. Various techniques, both palliative and reparative, have been used to treat this injury with variable success rates. If not adequately treated, they may even lead to the development of early-onset osteoarthritis. Among all the available techniques, microfractures are used in restoring the cartilage tissue, especially in the deep and extended lesions.

More recently, the need for minor bone trauma with still adequate bleeding resulted in the development of nanofractures. Nanofracturing means creating perforations with a smaller diameter that go deeper into the bone while damaging it less. This is supposed to reduce the injury to the subchondral bone and increase the amount of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells at the bone surface.

Thus, the aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy of nanofractures for the treatment of cartilage lesions of the knee, specifically focusing on the chondral healing that will be addressed with magnetic resonance imaging.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cartilage lesions of the knee scheduled for surgery
  • Age 16-50
  • BMI between 18.5 and 30 points
  • Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncorrected knee instability
  • Meniscectomy > 50%
  • Uncorrected knee misalignment
  • Uncontrolled metabolic diseases
  • Inability to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nanofracture

The planned study intervention consists of nanofracture surgical procedure for the treatment of cartilage lesions of the knee.

Nanofractures will be standardized 9 mm deep perforations in the subchondral bone.

Under arthroscopic view, the cartilage lesion is shaved to expose the margins of the lesion and remove damaged tissue. After a satisfactory lesion debridement is performed, a nanofracture device (Plasmaconcept NanoFx®) is placed through the arthroscopic portal. The awl is repeatedly penetrated through the bone until marrow elements are seen in the joint. The flow of arthroscopic fluid is interrupted to better observe the marrow elements emanating from the nanofracture holes. The distance between two consecutive perforations will be approximately 2-3 mm, and the number of perforations will depend on the cartilage lesion extension. All post-operative procedures, including the rehabilitation protocol, will be carried out according to the usual standard of care.

The planned study intervention consists of nanofracture surgical procedure for the treatment of cartilage lesions of the knee.

Nanofractures will be standardized 9 mm deep perforations in the subchondral bone.

Under arthroscopic view, the cartilage lesion is shaved to expose the margins of the lesion and remove damaged tissue. After a satisfactory lesion debridement is performed, a nanofracture device (Plasmaconcept NanoFx®) is placed through the arthroscopic portal. The awl is repeatedly penetrated through the bone until marrow elements are seen in the joint. The flow of arthroscopic fluid is interrupted to better observe the marrow elements emanating from the nanofracture holes. The distance between two consecutive perforations will be approximately 2-3 mm, and the number of perforations will depend on the cartilage lesion extension. All post-operative procedures, including the rehabilitation protocol, will be carried out according to the usual standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcomes measured by International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score
Time Frame: 12 months
The IKDC subjective score is a patient-completed tool to evaluate knee function. It contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcomes measured by International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score
Time Frame: 6 months, 24 months
he IKDC subjective score is a patient-completed tool to evaluate knee function. It contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
6 months, 24 months
Activity level measured by Tegner score
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Tegner activity score is a one-item questionnaire that can be used to evaluate pre-injury and current activity levels. It consists of 11 levels of grading activities (e.g., daily living, recreation, and competitive sports), with a score of zero representing "Sick leave or disability pension because of knee problems", 1 to 5 representing activities ranging from sedentary jobs to heavy manual labor, 6 to 9 representing recreational and competitive sports, and a score of 10 can be achieved by participating in national and international elite sports
6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Knee pain on the Visual Analogic Scale
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
The pain Visual Analogic Scale records the patient's self-rated knee pain on a virtual visual analogue scale. It ranges from 0-10 where the endpoints are labelled 'No pain' and 'The worst pain you can imagine'. It can be used as a quantitative measure of pain outcome that reflects the patient's judgement
6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Activity level measured by Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score has been developed to assess patient pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), function in daily living (17 items), function in sport and recreation (5 items), and knee related quality of life (4 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible knee symptoms and 100 indicating no knee symptoms.
6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Cartilage Repair Tissue measured by Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) 2.0 score
Time Frame: 12 months
The MOCART 2.0 score is a classification system that consists in 9 variables which are used to describe the morphology and signal intensity of the repair tissue compared to the adjacent native cartilage. T the MOCART 2.0 score will be calculated at magnetic resonance imaging performed 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luca Deabate, MD, Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ORL-ORT-037

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cartilage Damage

Subscribe