VIRtual Versus UsuAL In-office Care for Multiple Sclerosis (VIRTUAL-MS) (VIRTUAL-MS)

January 27, 2026 updated by: Marisa McGinley, The Cleveland Clinic

Virtual Versus Usual In-office Care for Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Trial (VIRTUAL-MS)

The current standard of outpatient MS care depends on in-clinic visits, but MS patients face many barriers to accessing this care. These barriers include those resulting from the disease itself, such as physical limitations, driving restrictions and financial limitations, and they are further compounded by an overall shortage of neurologists. Furthermore, MS care has a significant economic impact, with the estimated indirect and direct costs for treating MS in the US estimated to be > $85.4 billion. Therefore, there is a need to improve access to and reduce cost of MS care, and telehealth is a potential solution. The VIRTUAL-MS study has been designed to evaluate the impact of telehealth care on MS clinical outcomes, costs, and satisfaction compared to in-person care. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate facilitators and barriers to telehealth use to inform widespread implementation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The VIRTUAL-MS study aims to evaluate the impact of telehealth on MS care. The study will conduct a 24 month randomized controlled clinical trial at two Centers (Cleveland Clinic and University of California San Francisco) and will enroll 60 adult people with MS per Center with a recent diagnosis of MS. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive follow-up MS care via scheduled telehealth, or standard in-clinic, visits. All participants will have in-person visits at baseline and 24 months with in-person study visit including clinical assessments, patient reported outcomes, and medical history review. All participants will have clinical visits with their neurology clinician every 6 months (months 6, 12, and 18) via in-person or telehealth per randomized arm.

The primary objective of this study is to determine if MS care delivered via telehealth is non-inferior compared to in-clinic MS care as measured by worsening in one of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) components at Month 24.

The secondary objectives of this study include the following:

  • To determine if MS care delivered via telehealth has superior patient satisfaction compared to in-person MS care as measured by baseline to 24 month change in PSQ-18.
  • To determine if MS care delivered via telehealth is more cost-effective than MS care delivered via in-person visits as measured by total non-medication costs over 24 months.

The researchers will also explore other clinical outcomes, treatment adherence, digital outcomes, patient experience, and clinician experience.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California San Francisco
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ages ≥18
  2. MS diagnosis within 24 months of randomization by 2017 McDonald Criteria.
  3. Confirmatory MRI within 12 months prior to randomization.
  4. Access to either mobile device, laptop or PC with internet connection to be able to conduct virtual visits
  5. Participant's neurologist and/or advanced practice provider are participating in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinically relevant condition that, in the opinion of the PI, could preclude participation in the study (e.g. neutropenia or wound care requiring frequent monitoring)
  2. Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Telehealth care
Telehealth visits will be performed using institutionally-approved, secure, web-based teleconferencing. The standard neurology visits will occur every 6 months with their established neurology clinician via telehealth. The comprehensive care will be offered via telehealth or within the patient's local community. The comprehensive care visits will be adapted for the individual participants' needs and symptoms, consistent with standard clinical care.
Intervention includes clinical care delivered via telehealth
Active Comparator: In-Clinic care
Standard neurology visits will be conducted in-clinic visits every 6 months with their established neurology clinician. The comprehensive MS care visits will be conducted in-clinic. The comprehensive care visits will be adapted for the individual participants' needs and symptoms, consistent with standard clinical care.
Intervention includes clinical care delivered via standard in clinic visits

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with disability progression
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
The primary outcome will be disability worsening in one of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite components at 24 months. Worsening is defined as 20% worsening in Timed 25 foot walking speed (T25FW), 20% worsening in the 9 hole peg test (9HPT), 20% worsening in Low Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA) or a 4 point decrease in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).
Baseline to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare major healthcare costs
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
The secondary outcome will compare major healthcare costs as measured by total non-medication costs.
Baseline to 24 months
Change in Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18)
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months

The secondary outcome will assess patient and clinical care team satisfaction via the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) short form.

Minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 5 for each question, where 5 means a better outcome.

Baseline to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marisa McGinley, DO, The Cleveland Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Riley Bove, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care Delivery via telehealth

Subscribe