A Post-Market Study in Greece of a Minimally Invasive Breast Lift Procedure Utilizing the Renuvion APR System

April 29, 2025 updated by: Apyx Medical

A Post-Market Study of a Minimally Invasive Beast Lift Procedure Utilizing the Renuvion APR System

This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-center, evaluator blinded study of up to 15 subjects undergoing a minimally invasive breast lift procedure utilizing the Renuvion APR System. Subjects will receive treatment with the Renuvion APR System to both breasts.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-center, evaluator blinded study of up to 15 subjects undergoing a minimally invasive breast lift procedure utilizing the Renuvion APR System. Subjects will receive treatment with the Renuvion APR System to both breasts.

At baseline, the grade of breast ptosis, breast measurements and pre-surgery photographs will be taken using the site's camera system.

Procedure data and adverse events will be captured.

Follow-up visits will occur at 30, 90, and 180-days post-procedure. Subjects may also be seen back for follow-up at the investigator's discretion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Athens, Greece, 15562
        • Metropolitan General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female subjects, ages 18 - 75 years old.
  • ASA Physical Status Classification System Class I and Class II subjects.
  • Breast Ptosis Class II and Class III as per the Eyck et al, Rainbow Scale for Assessing Breast Ptosis.
  • Breast Cup Size A and Size B.
  • Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures or treatments in the areas to be treated during study participation.
  • Absence of physical conditions unacceptable to the investigator.
  • Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must be willing to use an approved method of birth control during study participation.
  • Willing and able to comply with protocol requirements, including study-required images/photos, assessments/measurements, and returning for follow-up visits.
  • Willing to release rights for the use of study photos, including in publication.
  • Able to read, understand, sign, and date the informed consent.
  • Able to communicate with the site via video and/or photographs, in the event of a virtual follow-up visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects presenting with ASA Physical Status Classification System Classes III or higher.
  • Breast ptosis Class IV or more as per the Eyck et al, Rainbow Scale for Assessing Breast Ptosis.
  • Breast Cup Size C, Size D or larger.
  • Prior surgery or procedure in the breast area (i.e., implants, skin tightening procedures, breast reduction, etc.).
  • Pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during study participation.
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to tumescent anesthetic (lidocaine/ epinephrine).
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to ibuprofen or other NSAIDS.
  • Previous treatment in the study treatment area.
  • Active systemic or local skin disease that may alter wound healing.
  • Significant or uncontrolled medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator participation in the study may compromise the patient's health.
  • History of autoimmune disease (excluding Hashimoto's thyroiditis).
  • Known susceptibility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring.
  • Cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions in the area to be treated.
  • Possesses a surgically implanted electronic device (i.e., pacemaker).
  • Serious mental health illness such as dementia or schizophrenia; psychiatric hospitalization in the past two years.
  • Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days prior to consent and throughout study participation.
  • Subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, is not an appropriate candidate for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Renuvion APR System
Subjects treated with the Renuvion APR system in both breasts.

The treatment area is defined as superior most not to exceed a horizontal line from the superior aspect of the axilla to the midline; inferior most not to cross the junction of the breast with the abdomen (inframammary fold). Lateral border to the outermost curvature of the breast or a vertical line drawn from the preaxillary line to the IMF; medial most to the innermost curvature of the breast up to 1 cm lateral to the sternal midline. The procedure will be in the intradermal and subdermal planes in the full breast area, without penetrating the breast gland.

Renuvion APR System settings will be 60-70% Power, 1.5 LPM, and up to 6 retrograde or 3 antegrade/retrograde passes, with a minimum of 2 incision sites.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Independent Photographic Review of Before and After Images Compared to Baseline Compared to D180.
Time Frame: 180-Day
Improvement in breast ptosis as determined by a masked, qualitative assessment of photographs at 180-days post-treatment compared to baseline by blinded independent reviewers.
180-Day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Independent Photographic Review of Before and After Images Compared to Baseline at D90.
Time Frame: 90-Day
Improvement in breast ptosis as determined by a masked, qualitative assessment of photographs at 90-days post-treatment compared to baseline by blinded independent reviewers.
90-Day

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Morphometric Breast Measurements at Day 30
Time Frame: 30-Day
Bilateral analysis of change to Morphometric breast measurements as per Brown, An Analysis of Ptosis at baseline and at D30.
30-Day
Change in Morphometric Breast Measurements at Day 90
Time Frame: 90-Day
Bilateral analysis of change to Morphometric breast measurements as per Brown, An Analysis of Ptosis at baseline and at D90.
90-Day
Change in Morphometric Breast Measurements at Day 180
Time Frame: 180-Day
Bilateral analysis of change to Morphometric breast measurements as per Brown, An Analysis of Ptosis at baseline and at D180.
180-Day
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Day 30
Time Frame: 30-Day
The investigator will grade the overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, or very much worse.
30-Day
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Day 90
Time Frame: 90-Day
The investigator will grade the overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, or very much worse.
90-Day
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Day 180
Time Frame: 180-Day
The investigator will grade the overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, or very much worse.
180-Day
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Day 30
Time Frame: 30-Day
The Subject will grade overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, or very much worse.
30-Day
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Day 90
Time Frame: 90-Day
The Subject will grade overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, or very much worse.
90-Day
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Day 180
Time Frame: 180-Day
The Subject will grade overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, or very much worse.
180-Day
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) at Day 180
Time Frame: 180-Day
Subjects will be asked to complete a satisfaction survey referring to the assessment of baseline photos, current photos, and a mirror. Yes/No - Did you notice any improvement in the laxity or sagginess of your breasts? If yes, checkbox - Less sagging, Breasts look higher on the chest, Nipple placement is improved, Breasts appear more youthful, and/or Other. How would you characterize your satisfaction with the treatment? - very satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied. Yes/No - Would you recommend this treatment to your friends and family members?
180-Day
Change in Breast Ptosis Classification at Day 180
Time Frame: 180-Day
Evaluation by the investigator grading the amount of visual breast ptosis (breast laxity) by the Rainbow scale of ptosis includes 5 grades: a Grade I (no ptosis), Grade II (minimal ptosis), Grade III (moderate ptosis), Grade IV (more than moderate ptosis), V (severe ptosis) scale.
180-Day
Breast-Q Survey
Time Frame: 180-Day
Subjects will complete the Psychosocial Well-Being and Sexual Well-Being questionnaires. Subjects were instructed "With your breasts in mind, in the past week, how often have you felt:". Responses were 5 options: 1 - None of the time, 2 - A little of the time, 3 - Some of the time, 4 - Most of the time, 5 - All of the time.
180-Day
Average Reported by Subject at Procedure
Time Frame: Procedure Day 0 (within 60 minutes following treatment)
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is "No Pain" and 10 is "Worst Possible Pain"
Procedure Day 0 (within 60 minutes following treatment)
Average Reported Pain by Subject at Day 30
Time Frame: 30-Day
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is "No Pain" and 10 is "Worst Possible Pain"
30-Day
Average Reported Pain by Subject at Day 90
Time Frame: 90-Day
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is "No Pain" and 10 is "Worst Possible Pain"
90-Day
Average Reported Pain by Subject at Day 180
Time Frame: 180-Day
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is "No Pain" and 10 is "Worst Possible Pain"
180-Day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aris Sterodimas, MD, MSc, PhD, Metropolitan General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APX-22-03-GR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Ptosis

Clinical Trials on Renuvion APR System

Subscribe