- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06243744
Histological Evaluation of Human Skin Bx to Assess the Effects of APR Tx as an Adjunct Procedure in Facelift Surgery
Histological Evaluation of Human Skin Biopsies to Assess the Effects of Renuvion APR Treatment as an Adjunct Procedure in Facelift Surgery
The goal of this prospective, single-arm clinical study is to gather quantifiable data on Renuvion's impact on skin elasticity and hydration, indicators of skin quality and estimate the biological skin age using DNA methylation in males and females between 18 and 75 years of age who plan to receive a lower facelift surgery. The main purpose is to quantify the effect of the Renuvion device on skin elasticity (collagen density, elastin, fibrillin-1), hydration (aquaporin-3, acidic glycosaminoglycans, HA), and DNA methylation to estimate the biological age of the skin.
Participants will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to gather quantifiable data on Renuvion's impact on skin elasticity and hydration, indicators of skin quality and estimate the biological skin age using DNA methylation.
This study is a prospective, single-arm clinical study to be conducted at up to three clinical sites in the US. Up to 10 subjects will be enrolled and treated if they meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and provide written informed consent.
Enrolled subjects meeting all entrance criteria and confirmed eligible for study treatment will be asked to participate. Subjects will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System. The mid/upper-face area will not be treated with Renuvion and the lower face/neck area will be treated with Renuvion. Treatment will consist of subdermal coagulation of soft tissue using the Renuvion APR handpiece.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34208
- LA Plastic Surgery and Dermatology
-
Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34237
- Holcomb & Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female subjects, ages 18 - 75 years old.
- ASA Physical Status Classification System Class I and Class II subjects.
- Planning to undergo a lower facelift procedure, with or without a neck lift, at the investigator's site.
- Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures or treatments in the areas to be treated during study participation.
- Absence of physical conditions unacceptable to the investigator.
- Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must be willing to use an approved method of birth control during study participation.
- Willing and able to comply with protocol requirements, including study-required images/photos, assessments/measurements, and returning for follow-up visits.
- Willing to release rights for the use of study photos, including in publication.
- Able to read, understand, sign, and date the informed consent.
- Able to communicate with the site via video and/or photographs, in the event of a virtual follow-up visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects presenting with ASA Physical Status Classification System Classes III or higher.
- Pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during study participation.
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to tumescent anesthetic (lidocaine/ epinephrine).
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to ibuprofen or other NSAIDS.
- Active systemic or local skin disease that may alter wound healing.
- Significant or uncontrolled medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator participation in the study may compromise the patient's health.
- History of autoimmune disease (excluding Hashimoto's thyroiditis).
- Known susceptibility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring.
- Cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions in the area to be treated.
- Possesses a surgically implanted electronic device (i.e. pacemaker).
- Serious mental health illness such as dementia or schizophrenia; psychiatric hospitalization in the past two years.
- Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days prior to consent and throughout study participation.
- Subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, is not an appropriate candidate for the study.
- Subject who has had a prior facelift, neck lift, or Renuvion treatment in the face/neck area
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Procedure with the Renuvion APR System in lower facelift area
Subjects will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System.
|
The Apyx Medical Corporation Renuvion/J-Plasma helium plasma family of products has received FDA clearance under 510(k) numbers K191542, K192867 for the cutting, coagulation, and ablation of soft tissue.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Analysis of Elasticity (Collagen & Elastin)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 180
|
To assess Elasticity (collagen & elastin) evaluation will be based on the qualitative histology in samples at baseline and Day 180 follow-up.
Two samples from each time period were analyses - control and treatment area.
The H&E, trichrome, and van Gieson-stained slides were evaluated via light microscopy for any abnormalities and extracellular matrix changes.
The results of histopathological assessment were scored using the industry standard 5-point scoring system.
0=Normal, 1=Minimal, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe.
|
Baseline, Day 180
|
|
Analyzing Days of Duration for Bruising, Swelling
Time Frame: Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180
|
Analysis days of duration of overall facial bruising and swelling post-treatment through the 180-day visit.
The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for bruising/swelling.
|
Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180
|
|
Percentage of Lower Face Area Healed
Time Frame: Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180
|
Percentage of the lower facial treatment area assessed as healed at each post-treatment time frame (Days 1, 7, 14, 45, 90 & 180) based on investigator clinical evaluation documented in Case Report Forms.
The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control untreated mid/upper-face area was not evaluated for healing.
|
Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180
|
|
Bleeding
Time Frame: During Procedure (Day 0)
|
Analysis of bleeding during surgery measured in cubic centimeter.
The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for bleeding.
|
During Procedure (Day 0)
|
|
The Principal Investigator Will Complete a PGAIS Assessing Overall Aesthetic Improvement in the Treatment Area at Day 180 Post-treatment.
Time Frame: Day 180
|
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (PGAIS) rating by investigator [Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse].
The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for GAIS as it was not treated.
|
Day 180
|
|
The Subject Will Complete a SGAIS Assessing Overall Aesthetic Improvement in the Treatment Area at Day 180 Post-treatment.
Time Frame: Day 180
|
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (SGAIS) rating by subject [Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse].
The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for GAIS as it was not treated.
|
Day 180
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 180
|
The subject will complete a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) while referring to their image in a mirror and current post-treatment photos compared to baseline photos to rate how satisfied they are, and if they note any improvement in the treatment area.
The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for PSQ as it was not treated.
|
Day 180
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Holcomb, M.D., Holcomb & Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa
- Principal Investigator: Melinda Lacerna, M.D., LA Plastic Surgery & Dermatology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Paul M, Blugerman G, Kreindel M, Mulholland RS. Three-dimensional radiofrequency tissue tightening: a proposed mechanism and applications for body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;35(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9564-0. Epub 2010 Sep 11.
- Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, Brown DB, Ksenzenko S, Burns J, Kilmer S, Mehregan D, Pope K. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Feb;140(2):204-9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.2.204.
- Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Rittman WJ, Mueller PR, Rosenthal DI. Radiofrequency tissue ablation: importance of local temperature along the electrode tip exposure in determining lesion shape and size. Acad Radiol. 1996 Mar;3(3):212-8. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(96)80443-0.
- Thomsen S. Pathologic analysis of photothermal and photomechanical effects of laser-tissue interactions. Photochem Photobiol. 1991 Jun;53(6):825-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb09897.x.
- Ross EV, McKinlay JR, Anderson RR. Why does carbon dioxide resurfacing work? A review. Arch Dermatol. 1999 Apr;135(4):444-54. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.4.444.
- Gardner ES, Reinisch L, Stricklin GP, Ellis DL. In vitro changes in non-facial human skin following CO2 laser resurfacing: a comparison study. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;19(4):379-87. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:43.0.CO;2-P.
- Doshi SN, Alster TS. Combination radiofrequency and diode laser for treatment of facial rhytides and skin laxity. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005 Mar;7(1):11-5. doi: 10.1080/14764170410003075.
- Fatemi A, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Short-term histologic effects of nonablative resurfacing: results with a dynamically cooled millisecond-domain 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):172-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01112.x.
- Mayoral FA. Skin tightening with a combined unipolar and bipolar radiofrequency device. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Feb;6(2):212-5.
- Alster TS, Doshi SN, Hopping SB. Combination surgical lifting with ablative laser skin resurfacing of facial skin: a retrospective analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2004 Sep;30(9):1191-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30370.x.
- Hsu TS, Kaminer MS. The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003 Jun;22(2):115-23. doi: 10.1053/sder.2003.50011.
- Hurwitz D, Smith D. Treatment of overweight patients by radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) for aesthetic reshaping and skin tightening. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Feb;36(1):62-71. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9783-z. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
- Irvine Duncan D. Nonexcisional tissue tightening: creating skin surface area reduction during abdominal liposuction by adding radiofrequency heating. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Nov 1;33(8):1154-66. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13505862.
- Boeni R. Safety of tumescent liposuction under local anesthesia in a series of 4,380 patients. Dermatology. 2011;222(3):278-81. doi: 10.1159/000327375. Epub 2011 May 24.
- Nakab L, Hee CK, Guetta O. Improvements in Skin Quality Biological Markers in Skin Explants Using Hyaluronic Acid Filler VYC-12L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 27;8(3):e2723. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002723. eCollection 2020 Mar.
- van Dongen JA, Langeveld M, van de Lande LS, Harmsen MC, Stevens HP, van der Lei B. The Effects of Facial Lipografting on Skin Quality: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):784e-797e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006147.
- Narins RS, Brandt F, Leyden J, Lorenc ZP, Rubin M, Smith S. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun;29(6):588-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29150.x.
- Boroni M, Zonari A, Reis de Oliveira C, Alkatib K, Ochoa Cruz EA, Brace LE, Lott de Carvalho J. Highly accurate skin-specific methylome analysis algorithm as a platform to screen and validate therapeutics for healthy aging. Clin Epigenetics. 2020 Jul 13;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00899-1.
- Fuchshuber P, Schwaitzberg S, Jones D, Jones SB, Feldman L, Munro M, Robinson T, Purcell-Jackson G, Mikami D, Madani A, Brunt M, Dunkin B, Gugliemi C, Groah L, Lim R, Mischna J, Voyles CR. The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2583-2602. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5933-y. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- APX-21-04
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Skin Laxity
-
CynosureLutronicCompletedFacial Skin Laxity | Facial Aging | Submental and Neck Skin LaxityUnited States
-
Shanghai Punan Hospital of Pudong New DistrictEnrolling by invitation
-
Rocky Mountain Biosystems, Inc.CompletedLaxity of SkinUnited States
-
Rocky Mountain Biosystems, Inc.CompletedLaxity of SkinUnited States
-
The Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of...Completed
-
CLASSYS Inc.RecruitingFacial Skin Laxity | Skin Laxity (Submental and Neck) | Submental Tissue LaxityUnited States
-
Merz North America, Inc.Ulthera, IncCompletedMild to Moderate Skin Laxity Under the Chin | Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on NeckUnited States
-
Apsara Medical CorporationCompleted
-
Ulthera, IncCompletedSkin Laxity of the décolletéUnited States
-
Ulthera, IncUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompletedMild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Cheek | Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Upper Neck | Mild to Moderate Subcutaneous Fat on Cheek | Mild to Moderate Subcutaneous Fat on Upper Neck
Clinical Trials on Renuvion APR System
-
Apyx MedicalCompleted
-
Apyx MedicalCompletedLabia Enlarged | Labium; HypertrophyUnited States
-
Apyx MedicalCompleted
-
Apyx MedicalCompleted
-
Apyx MedicalCompletedGynecomastiaUnited States
-
Apyx MedicalCompletedLax SkinUnited States
-
Apyx MedicalCompleted
-
Stony Brook UniversityUnknownRectal AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
University of UtahTerminatedSubdermal Skin TighteningUnited States
-
Aprea TherapeuticsRecruitingAdvanced Solid TumorUnited States