First-day Computed Tomography: Does it Has a Role in the Assessment of Patients With Inhalation Lung Injury?

January 30, 2023 updated by: Amal A. El-Koa, Menoufia University
A major risk factor for death in burn victims is inhalation lung injury. Diagnostic criteria and severity grading are not well understood. After an inhalation injury, the mucociliary escalator is impaired by induced mucosal hyperemia, which includes Edema, increased mucous production, and airway exudation, and these insults worsen airway narrowing which interferes with ventilation. Multimodal therapy and quick bronchoscopic diagnosis improve patient outcomes. Early identification and classification of inhalation injuries improve patient outcomes. Chest CT may be employed as an alternative to or supplement to the bronchoscopy as well as a diagnostic and prognostic tool. In this study, the diagnostic and prognostic value of bronchial wall thickening as a radiological CT finding in inhalation lung damage and the radiologist score (RADS) were evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Forty-eight patients with inhalation lung injury were included in the study as the case group, and ten patients without ILI were chosen as the control group. Both groups were recruited from the burn and plastic department. A fiberoptic bronchoscope was performed during the first 12 hours of a suspected ILI to confirm the diagnosis. After performing an initial chest X-ray, computed tomography was used to calculate the radiologist score (RADS) and the thickness of the bronchial walls (BWT).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • any patient with a suspected inhalational lung injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • less than 18 years old,
  • patients who had their CT scan after 24 hours after their admission
  • patients who couldn't finish all of the study steps.
  • patients that are known to have any parenchymal lung disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Cases
48 participants with burn injuries associated with inhalation lung injuries were recruited from the burn department.
Within the first 12 hours of suspected inhalation lung injury, fiberoptic bronchoscopy was done to confirm the diagnosis. After confirming the diagnosis, an initial chest CT in the first 24 hrs through which the radiologist score (RADS) together with bronchial wall thickening (BWT) was done.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control
10 participants with burn injuries NOT associated with inhalation lung injuries were recruited from the burn department.
Within the first 12 hours of suspected inhalation lung injury, fiberoptic bronchoscopy was done to confirm the diagnosis. After confirming the diagnosis, an initial chest CT in the first 24 hrs through which the radiologist score (RADS) together with bronchial wall thickening (BWT) was done.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bronchial wall thickening (BWT)
Time Frame: 24 hours
measured through a CT chest scan at the end inspiration 2 cm distal to the tracheal bifurcation.
24 hours
Radiologist score
Time Frame: 24 hours
CT scans of each patient were examined using 1-cm axial slices from the apex to the diaphragm level. The right and left lung fields in each slice were subdivided into 4 quadrants. Each quadrant was awarded a score ranging from 0 to 3 based on the severity of the results. The highest score inside a quadrant was awarded as the final score, and a total score was produced for each slice. The total score for each slice was then added together for the full CT scan to get the RADS overall.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2023

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inhalation Injury

Clinical Trials on chest computed tomography (CT)

Subscribe