Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Plane Block

October 12, 2023 updated by: Hassan Mokhtar Elshorbagy Hetta, Minia University

Comparison Between the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Plane Block for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Hepatobiliary Surgery

Retrolaminar block (RLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are alternative approaches to paravertebral block (PVB) and are advantageous in that they are easier and safer techniques compared with the traditional PVB. These blocks are considered to be compartment blocks or interfascial plane blocks. In these approaches, local anesthetics are assumed to penetrate the superior costotransverse ligament and reach the paravertebral space, although the needle tip is not advanced into the paravertebral space.

the study aim to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of retrolaminar plane block and erector spinae plane block.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minia
      • Minya, Minia, Egypt, 61511
        • Minia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age18-60.
  2. Both genders.
  3. hepatobiliary surgery.
  4. ASA I-III.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Drug allergy.
  2. Morbid obesity (BMI >40 kg/m2).
  3. Psychiatric disorder.
  4. Opiod dependence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ESPB
curved probe will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the spine using a sagittal approach at the level of T8. After identification of erector spinae muscle and transverse processes, the needle will be inserted deeply into the erector spinae muscle.
Experimental: Retrolaminar plane block
curved probe will be placed 1-1.5 cm lateral to the target spinous process after identification of the lamina, the needle will be advanced caudally until it contacts the lamina

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue pain scale
Time Frame: 24 hour
score from 0-10 (0 mean no pain and 10 the worst pain )
24 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of first post operative analgesic request.
Time Frame: 24 hour
time to demand rescue analgesia
24 hour
Total analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 24 hour
total fentanyl consumption during the first day postoperative
24 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 544/2022

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on retrolaminar block

Subscribe