- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07291388
Effectiveness of Retrolaminar Block in Lumbar Spine Fusion With Multimodal Analgesia (RBLUF)
December 5, 2025 updated by: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Effectiveness of Retrolaminar Block in Reducing Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusion With Multimodal Analgesia
This randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in reducing postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery under multimodal analgesia.
The participants will:
- Be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a retrolaminar block with 0.25% bupivacaine plus epinephrine or a sham block (normal saline) prior to surgical incision.
- Receive standardized multimodal analgesia.
- Have follow-up by the Acute Pain Unit during the first 3 days, to assess opioid consumption (morphine) in 24 hours, pain intensity measured by Numeric Rating Scale, quality of recovery assessed by the QoR-15 questionnaire, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
After obtaining approval from the institutional CEC-CCSS and prospective registration of the study at clinicaltrials.org, the investigators will recruit patients who meet the inclusion criteria and provide written consent.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
44
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Victor Contreras, MSN
- Phone Number: 3414 56223543414
- Email: vecontre@uc.cl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Juan Carlos De la Cuadra-Fontaine, MD
- Phone Number: 5695337297
- Email: juancarl@ucchristus.cl
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 18-75 years, scheduled for lumbar spine fusion surgery by a trauma team
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification I-III
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of chronic use of strong or weak opioids for more than 3 months.
- Diagnosis of chronic pain and treatment by a pain management team.
- ASA score greater than or equal to 4.
- Patients with prior lumbar spine surgery. Spinal instrumentation at the surgical site.
- Estimated creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min.
- Coagulation disorder or abnormal coagulation tests.
- Infection at the surgical site.
- Weight less than 50 kg.
- Altered mental status that prevents reliable evaluation.
- Allergy to local anesthetics or analgesic drugs used in the study.
- Patients with contraindications to peripheral nerve blocks.
- Lumbar spine fixation due to oncologic disease or acute trauma.
- Use of intraoperative neuromonitoring and TIVA.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Retrolaminar block
Participants received retrolaminar block with 0.25% Bupivacaine (20 ml) plus epinephrine (5 mcg/ml), on both sides of the vertebral lamina, and a subcutaneous injection in the area of the surgical incision with 20 ml of the same concentration and dose used previously.
|
Retrolaminar block with bupivacaine and epinephrine on both sides of the vertebral lamina, and subcutaneous injection in the area of the surgical incision.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham block
Participants received a retrolaminar sham block with 0.9% saline solution (20 ml), on both sides of the vertebra lamina, and a subcutaneous injection in the area of the surgical incision with 20 ml of the same concentration and dose used previously.
|
Sham block in the retrolaminar area with saline solution on both sides of the vertebral lamina, and subcutaneous injection in the area of the surgical incision.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Opioid consumption during the first 24 hours postoperative
Time Frame: Daily consumption during the first 24 hours
|
To assess rescue opioid consumption, expressed as morphine equivalents, during the first 24 hours postoperative.
|
Daily consumption during the first 24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Daily Numeric Rating Score (NRS) during the first 3 postoperative days
Time Frame: Daily NRS during the first 3 postoperative days
|
The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) is commonly used to assess pain intensity.
Its minimum score is 0, indicating no pain, and its maximum score is 10, indicating the worst pain imaginable.
This scale is simple and allows patients to rate their pain using a number from 0 to 10.
The objective is to assess the intensity of acute postoperative pain, expressed as NRS, during the first 3 postoperative days.
|
Daily NRS during the first 3 postoperative days
|
|
Daily score on the "Quality of Recovery-15" (QoR-15) scale during the first 3 postoperative days.
Time Frame: Preoperative score and daily score during the first 3 postoperative days
|
The QoR-15 is a validated instrument in the literature that assesses the quality of recovery in patients after surgery.
It is a multidimensional measurement tool that allows healthcare professionals to gain an overview of the patient's well-being during the postoperative period.
The questionnaire consists of 15 items, covering 5 dimensions: Physical Comfort, Physical Independence, Emotional Support, Psychological Well-being, and Satisfaction with Recovery.
The minimum score on the scale is 0 points, and the maximum score is 150 points.
This range is obtained by summing the scores of the different categories evaluated in the QoR-15 scale, where a higher score indicates a better quality of postoperative recovery.
|
Preoperative score and daily score during the first 3 postoperative days
|
|
bleeding and transfusions
Time Frame: Intraoperative and during the first 3 days
|
Subjective assessment of total intraoperative bleeding (mild, moderate, severe), blood in collectors, number of compresses with blood, hematocrit variations at 24 hours after the procedure and need for transfusion in the perioperative period.
|
Intraoperative and during the first 3 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.
- Chazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.
- Morales-Ariza V, Loaiza-Aldean Y, de Miguel M, Pena-Navarro M, Martinez-Silva O, Gonzalez-Tallada A, Manrique-Munoz S, de Nadal M. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the postoperative quality of recovery 15 (QoR-15) questionnaire for Spanish-speaking patients: A prospective cohort study. Am J Surg. 2023 Apr;225(4):740-747. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
- Onishi E, Toda N, Kameyama Y, Yamauchi M. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Anatomical Investigation between Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block. Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 28;2019:2578396. doi: 10.1155/2019/2578396. eCollection 2019.
- Machado GC, Ferreira PH, Harris IA, Pinheiro MB, Koes BW, van Tulder M, Rzewuska M, Maher CG, Ferreira ML. Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0122800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122800. eCollection 2015.
- Pepper CG, Mikhaeil JS, Khan JS. Perioperative Regional Anesthesia on Persistent Opioid Use and Chronic Pain after Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg. 2024 Oct 1;139(4):711-722. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006947. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
- Kaye AD, Kandregula S, Kosty J, Sin A, Guthikonda B, Ghali GE, Craig MK, Pham AD, Reed DS, Gennuso SA, Reynolds RM, Ehrhardt KP, Cornett EM, Urman RD. Chronic pain and substance abuse disorders: Preoperative assessment and optimization strategies. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Jun;34(2):255-267. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.04.014. Epub 2020 May 7.
- Garg B, Ahuja K, Sharan AD. Regional Anesthesia for Spine Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep 1;30(17):809-819. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00101. Epub 2022 May 25.
- Voscopoulos C, Palaniappan D, Zeballos J, Ko H, Janfaza D, Vlassakov K. The ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;60(9):888-95. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9983-x.
- Karmakar MK, Sivakumar RK, Sheah K, Pangthipampai P, Lonnqvist PA. Quest for the Elusive Mechanism of Action for the Thoracic Paraspinal Nerve Block Techniques. Are We Ignoring the Anatomy of the "Retro Superior Costotransverse Ligament Space?". Anesth Analg. 2023 Aug 1;137(2):458-465. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006462. Epub 2023 Jul 14. No abstract available.
- Peker K, Aydin G, Gencay I, Saracoglu AG, Sahin AT, Ogden M, Peker SA. The effect of preemptive retrolaminar block on lumbar spinal decompression surgery. Eur Spine J. 2024 Nov;33(11):4253-4261. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08219-4. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
- Schnabel A, Yahiaoui-Doktor M, Meissner W, Zahn PK, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Predicting poor postoperative acute pain outcome in adults: an international, multicentre database analysis of risk factors in 50,005 patients. Pain Rep. 2020 Jul 27;5(4):e831. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000831. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
- Kaciroglu A, Ekinci M, Gurbuz H, Ulusoy E, Ekici MA, Dogan O, Golboyu BE, Alver S, Ciftci B. Surgical vs ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block for pain management following lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Eur Spine J. 2024 Jul;33(7):2630-2636. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08347-x. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 5, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
December 18, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 18, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 5, 2025
Last Verified
August 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 241022008
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute Pain
-
Rajavithi HospitalCompletedTotal Abdominal Hysterectomy ,Pain , Acute Postoperative,Gabapentin , CelecoxibThailand
-
Umraniye Education and Research HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Zagazig UniversityRecruiting
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain, AcuteEgypt
-
Aga Khan UniversityRecruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, AcuteKorea, Republic of
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute
-
Schulthess KlinikNot yet recruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on retrolaminar block
-
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research...Completed
-
Minia UniversityCompletedAnalgesia | Post Operative PainEgypt
-
Kocaeli UniversityActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Lumbar Disc HerniationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases | Spinal Fusion SurgeryEgypt
-
Damanhour Teaching HospitalRecruiting
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptCompleted
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedPain Management | PCNL | Postoperative Analgesia | Regional Anesthesia BlockEgypt
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery Postoperative AnalgesiaEgypt
-
Elazıg Fethi Sekin Sehir HastanesiNot yet recruiting
-
Universidad de los Andes, ChileRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Lumbar Surgery | Back Pain Lower Back Chronic | Regional Anaesthesia | Opioid AnalgesiaChile