Changes in Lung Aeration and Inspiratory Effort With and Without Awake Prone

May 5, 2023 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Changes in Lung Aeration and Inspiratory Effort During High-Flow Nasal Oxygen and Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation With and Without Awake Prone

The investigators aimed to investigate the ventilation homogeneity and transpulmonary pressure during treatments of High-flow nasal cannula(HFNC) and (CPAP) on supine and prone position for COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Awake prone positioning (APP) for non-intubated patients has been reported to improve oxygenation for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF),particularly for patients with COVID-19 induced AHRF, APP has been shown to decrease the need of intubation.Similarly, APP with helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) enables a reduction in the work of breathing and an improvement in oxygenation and sensation of dyspnea in COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Moreover, among intubated patients with ARDS assessed by electro-impedance tomography (EIT), prone positioning was found to reduce alveolar overdistention and collapse, resulting in improvement of ventilation homogeneity.However, the effects of APP on the ventilation homogeneity and work of breathing for non-COVID-19 patients with AHRF remain unknown.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been proven to improve oxygenation and reduce intubation rate for patients with AHRF in multiple meta-analyses,and has been recommended to treat AHRF in several recently published guidelines.CPAP provides consistent level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), in comparison to variable level of PEEP generated by HFNC, thus CPAP was reported to have greater improvement of oxygenation than HFNC in 20 patients with AHRF, more importantly, they found that among patients who avoided intubation, the extent of oxygenation improvement was greater with HFNC+APP than with NIV+APP, in contrast, for patients who were intubated, the extent of oxygenation improvement was greater with NIV+APP than with HFNC+APP.This raised the concerns of the self-inflicted lung injury (SILI) generated by heterogenous aeration and large swings of transpulmonary pressure. Thus, the investigators aimed to investigate the ventilation homogeneity and transpulmonary pressure during treatments of HFNC and CPAP on supine and prone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Zhongshan Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ming Zhong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients (18-90 years) who have acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, requiring FIO2 > 0.4 to maintain SpO2 at 90-95% during HFNC at 50 L/min

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who need immediate intubation; refuse to participate in the study; unable to communicate; have contraindication to place the esophageal catheter; unable to use EIT, such as open-chest surgery with chest tube placement; have contraindication for prone positioning, including pregnant, post-abdomen surgery within a week; hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: HFNC SP
HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at supine position
  1. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at supine position
  2. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at prone position
  3. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at supine position
  4. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at prone position
  5. MC at supine position
  6. MC at prone position
Other Names:
  • HFNC and NIV
Active Comparator: HFNC PP
HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at prone position
  1. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at supine position
  2. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at prone position
  3. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at supine position
  4. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at prone position
  5. MC at supine position
  6. MC at prone position
Other Names:
  • HFNC and NIV
Active Comparator: NIV SP
CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at supine position
  1. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at supine position
  2. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at prone position
  3. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at supine position
  4. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at prone position
  5. MC at supine position
  6. MC at prone position
Other Names:
  • HFNC and NIV
Active Comparator: NIV PP
CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at prone position
  1. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at supine position
  2. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at prone position
  3. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at supine position
  4. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at prone position
  5. MC at supine position
  6. MC at prone position
Other Names:
  • HFNC and NIV
Placebo Comparator: MC SP
Mask oxygen at supine position
  1. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at supine position
  2. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at prone position
  3. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at supine position
  4. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at prone position
  5. MC at supine position
  6. MC at prone position
Other Names:
  • HFNC and NIV
Placebo Comparator: MC PP
Mask oxygen at prone position
  1. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at supine position
  2. HFNC flow at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at prone position
  3. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at supine position
  4. CPAP with full face mask at 10 cmH2O at prone position
  5. MC at supine position
  6. MC at prone position
Other Names:
  • HFNC and NIV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The differences in lung homogeneity during HFNC
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The differences in lung homogeneity (global inhomogeneity index) during HFNC therapy at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at supine and awake prone position
30 minutes
The differences in lung homogeneity during CPAP
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The differences in lung homogeneity (global inhomogeneity index) during CPAP with full face mask at 8 cmH2O at supine and awake prone position
30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
work of breathing
Time Frame: 30 minutes
the differences in WOB during HFNC therapy at 60 L/min or maximum tolerable flow at supine and awake prone position
30 minutes
patient' comfort scores
Time Frame: 30 minutes
during HFNC and CPAP treatment at supine and prone position, patient' comfort scores
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ming Zhong, MD, phD, Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on With and Without Awake Prone Positioning

Subscribe