Effects of Manual Therapy With TECAR in Woman With Chronic Neck Pain

November 6, 2024 updated by: Dimitrios Lytras, International Hellenic University

Effects of a Protocol of Soft Tissue Mobilization Techniques With or Without TECAR Treatment on Pain, Local Sensitivity, Neck Range of Motion, and Functional Ability in Woman With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of our clinical study is to investigate the efficacy of combining a program of manual techniques for treating chronic neck pain with the simultaneous application of TECAR therapy, utilizing two specialized anti-static electrode bracelets. A total of 80 women with upper trapezius trigger points and neck pain persisting for more than 12 weeks will be randomly assigned to two groups. In the first group, combined treatment involving manual techniques and two TECAR anti-static electrode bracelets will be administered, while in the second group, the same protocol will be followed without the electrode bracelets. All participants will receive a total of 15 treatments over five weeks, with a follow-up assessment six months post-treatment. Pain will be measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and pain thresholds at the upper trapezius muscle and suboccipital area will be evaluated with a digital algometer. Additionally, neck range of motion will be assessed with a goniometer, and functional ability will be evaluated using the "Neck Disability Index" questionnaire. Assessments will be conducted before and after the treatment period, with a follow-up assessment six months later. For statistical analysis, a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with repeated measures will be applied, with the significance level set at p < .05.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Chronic neck pain is defined as neck pain lasting more than 12 weeks and is often accompanied by painful trigger points in the neck muscles. The use of manual techniques, such as myofascial release and ischemic compression on painful points in the neck muscles, has been shown to reduce pain and improve functional ability and neck range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Aim: The aim of our clinical study is to investigate the efficacy of combining a program of manual techniques for treating chronic neck pain with the simultaneous application of TECAR therapy using two specialized anti-static electrode bracelets.

Method: Eighty women with upper trapezius trigger points and neck pain symptoms persisting for more than 12 weeks will be randomly assigned to two groups. The first group will receive a combined treatment of manual techniques with two TECAR anti-static electrode bracelets, while the second group will follow the same protocol without the electrode bracelets. All participants will undergo a total of 15 treatments over five weeks, with a follow-up assessment after six months. Pain will be measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the upper trapezius muscle and suboccipital area will be evaluated with a digital algometer, neck range of motion (ROM) will be assessed using a goniometer, and functional ability will be measured with the "Neck Disability Index" questionnaire. Assessments will be conducted before and after the treatment period, with a follow-up assessment six months later. For statistical analysis, a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with repeated measures will be applied, with the significance level set at p < .05.

Expected Results: Modern TECAR devices, through special resistive bracelet electrodes, allow the therapist's hand to function as a mobile electrode. This enables the simultaneous effect of both therapeutic modalities-manual techniques and high-frequency current. Therefore, we expect the combination to be more effective than manual techniques alone in improving the clinical profile of adult women with chronic neck pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindos Thessaloníki
      • Thessaloníki, Sindos Thessaloníki, Greece, 57 400
        • Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences International Hellenic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Women with chronic neck pain lasting at least three months Presence of at least one active or latent trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle Numerical Rating Pain Scale score greater than 3 Written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Participation in any form of treatment in the past three months (e.g., physiotherapy, massage, local anesthetic injections) History of neck trauma and/or surgery in the neck region Paresthesia in the neck area Implanted pacemaker Cancer Pregnancy Systemic musculoskeletal diseases, diagnosed neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Parkinson's disease), epilepsy, or history of psychiatric disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Manual Therapy with TECAR
Participants allocated to this group received 15 sessions of a manual therapy protocol applied by two resistive TECAR bracelet electrodes (one in each hand).

The following myofascial release techniques will be applied:

Myofascial release of the upper trapezius Gross stretch, vertical gross stretch, and focused stretch of the upper trapezius Myofascial release at the cranial base Gross release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle

Additionally, the following ischemic compression technique will be applied:

Ischemic compression on the upper trapezius muscle Manual therapy manipulations will be administered in combination with a capacitive conventional electrode and two special electrode bracelets that turn the therapist's hands into anti-static electrodes. High-frequency currents will be applied at frequencies of 300 kHz, 500 kHz, and 1 MHz, with a flexible self-adhesive grounding electrode placed on the thoracic spine for reference.

Active Comparator: Manual Therapy without TECAR bracelet electrodes
Participants allocated to this group received the same Manual Therapy protocol without the resistive TECAR bracelet electrodes
Participants in this group will follow the same manual protocol as the first group, without the application of high-frequency current. Each manual therapy session will begin with a ten-minute preparation involving light massage and stretching. The massage will include the effleurage technique, followed by petrissage and kneading, focusing on the cervical and thoracic areas, particularly the upper trapezius, suboccipital region, and cervical paraspinal muscles. Stretching will be applied to the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and sternocleidomastoid muscles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in neck pain intensity with Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week 5, 6-month follow-up
This tool is an eleven-point pain scale numbered from zero to 10. The left end of the scale corresponds to zero and is marked as "No pain", whereas the right end corresponds to 10 and is marked as "Maximum pain". Consequently, a higher value indicates more intense pain (Childs et al, 2005). The examinee is asked to choose an integer that best reflects the intensity of their pain. The NPRS is widely used to measure pain in both clinical practice and research, showing high test-retest reliability and high conceptual construct validity
pre-treatment, week 5, 6-month follow-up
Changes in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) with pressure algometry
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week 5, 6-month follow-up
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is defined as the minimum amount of pressure that induces pain. PPT was assessed using a digital algometer. Measurements were taken over the upper border of the trapezius muscle, midway between the midline and the lateral border of the acromion, as well as in the suboccipital area, 2 cm lateral to the spinous process of the axis. The metal rod of the algometer was positioned vertically on each site, and the examiner applied gradually increasing pressure at a rate of 1 kg/s. PPT was recorded in kg/cm².
pre-treatment, week 5, 6-month follow-up
Changes in functional capacity with the Greek Version of Neck disability index questionnaire
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week 5, 6-month follow-up
It is a self-reported, ten-item scale, with each item assessing different aspects of neck pain complaints. Most items relate to restrictions in activities of daily living, and each item is rated on a scale of 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no disability and 5 indicates maximum disability. The total score ranges from 0 to 50. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is well-supported in the literature and is the most commonly used tool for reporting neck pain.
pre-treatment, week 5, 6-month follow-up
Changes in Cervical Range of Motion through goniometry
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week 5, 6-month follow-up
Active cervical range of motion was measured using two types of goniometers: two bubble inclinometers and a large-scale universal goniometer. Measurements included active cervical flexion, extension, rotation, and side bending, with participants seated in an upright position. Range of motion was recorded in degrees.
pre-treatment, week 5, 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Paris Iakovidis, Ph.D, Department of Physiotherapy, International Hellenic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EC-03/2023

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Manual Therapy with TECAR

Subscribe