Manual Therapy Plus Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer Therapy in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain

March 25, 2023 updated by: Dimitrios Lytras, International Hellenic University

Short-term Effects of Manual Therapy Plus Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer Therapy in Pain Disability and Spinal Mobility in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study

Chronic low back pain is defined as back pain that lasts longer than 12 weeks. The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the efficacy of combining a program of manual techniques with the application of Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer (TECAR) therapy to treat chronic low back pain. Sixty adults with chronic low back pain will be randomly divided into three groups of 20 each. In the participants of the first group, a therapeutic protocol of manual soft tissue mobilization in the lumbar region will be applied. To the participants of the second group, the same protocol of manual techniques will be applied in combination with TECAR therapy, which will be applied through a conventional capacitive electrode as well as an antistatic electrode bracelet (making the hand of the physical therapist an antistatic electrode). The third group participants will receive no treatment. Both programs will include six treatments over two weeks. Pain in the last 24 hours with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), functional ability with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) in the lumbar region with an algometer, and lumbar flexion range of motion through fingertip-to-floor distance (FFD) test will be evaluated before and after the intervention with a follow-up one month later. For the statistical analysis of the results, a two-factor analysis of variance with repeated measurements will be applied, while the statistical significance index will be set at p < .05.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Chronic low back pain is defined as back pain that lasts longer than 12 weeks.

Aim: The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate the efficacy of combining a program of manual techniques with the application of Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer (TECAR) therapy in people with chronic low back pain.

Method: Sixty adults with chronic low back pain will be randomly divided into three groups of 20 people each. In the participants of the first group, a therapeutic protocol of manual soft tissue mobilization in the lumbar region will be applied. To the participants of the second group, the same protocol of manual techniques will be applied in combination with TECAR therapy, which will be applied through a conventional capacitive electrode as well as an antistatic electrode bracelet (making the hand of the physical therapist an antistatic electrode). The third group participants will receive no treatment. Both programs will include six treatments over two weeks. Pain in the last 24 hours with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), functional ability with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) in the lumbar region with an algometer, and lumbar flexion range of motion through fingertip-to-floor distance (FFD) test will be evaluated before and after the intervention with a follow-up one month later. For the statistical analysis of the results, a two-factor analysis of variance with repeated measurements will be applied, while the statistical significance index will be set at p < .05.

Expected results: The protocol proposed in this clinical study combines the beneficial effects of TECAR treatment with the benefits of applying manual techniques. Modern TECAR devices make it possible, through special resistive bracelet electrodes, to turn the hand of the therapist into a mobile electrode providing a simultaneous effect of the two therapeutic means through manual techniques and high-frequency current. For this reason, we expect the specific combination to be more effective than the individual application of manual techniques in improving the clinical picture of adults with chronic low back pain. For the statistical analysis of the results, a two-way ANOVA with repeated measurements will be applied.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindos Thessaloníki
      • Thessaloníki, Sindos Thessaloníki, Greece, 57400
        • Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences International Hellenic Universit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Duration of symptoms 12 weeks
  • Women - Men
  • Age range between 20 and 60 years
  • Written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neuropathic pain extending along the lower limb due to nerve root compression
  • Previous spine surgery
  • History of spine trauma or fracture
  • Implanted pacemakers
  • Pregnancy
  • Cancer
  • Systemic musculoskeletal diseases, diagnosed neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Parkinson's), epilepsy, and history of psychiatric disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: "Soft Tissue Mobilization"
Participants allocated to this group will receive six sessions of soft tissue mobilization technique accord to Kaltenborn (2018) .

The protocol will last 30 minutes and will include the application of the following manual techniques:

  • Lumbar soft tissue and joint cranial and lateral mobilization with the patient in the supine position
  • Bilateral medial lumbar soft tissue mobilization
  • Functional massage on the quadratus lumborum muscle with the patient in a lateral position on both sides
  • Extension with coupled sidebending mobilization of the thoracic area with the patient in a lateral position on both sides
  • Soft tissue lateral mobilization of the thoracic area with the patient in a lateral position on both sides
Experimental: "Soft Tissue Mobilization" and "TECAR"
Participants allocated to this group will receive the same manual therapy protocol with Group 1 in combination with Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer Therapy (TECAR).
The participants of this group will be given the same manual protocol as the first group in combination with the application of high frequency current. Soft tissue mobilization manipulations will be applied in combination with a capacitive conventional electrode and with a special electrode bracelet that makes the therapist's own hand as an antistatic electrode. The frequencies of the high frequency current will be 300khz, 500khz, and 1MHz, while as a reference electrode a flexible self-adhesive ground will be used placed on the abdomen
Active Comparator: "Control"
Control Group
Participants in this group will only receive general instructions about managing their back pain and counseling about avoiding activities that may worsen their symptoms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) with pressure algometry
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 1, 2, 6
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is defined as the minimal amount of pressure that produces pain. PPT will be assessed by a digital algometer and will be evaluated bilaterally in the quadratus lumborum muscle, in the sacroiliac joints, and paravertebrally in the L4-L5 intervertebral space. The metal rod of the algometer will be placed vertically on the site and the examiner will apply gradually increasing pressure at a rate of 1Kg/s. PPT is calculated in kg/cm2 (Imamura et al., 2016)
pre-treatment, week: 1, 2, 6
Changes in functional capacity with the Greek Version of Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 1, 2, 6
The functional ability of the participants will be evaluated with the Greek version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire, which consists of 24 questions related to daily activities that patients often report difficulty performing due to low back pain. Each positive answer earns one point and the final score is calculated by adding all the points. Therefore, the higher the score, the greater the restriction. The Greek version of the questionnaire shows satisfactory reliability and validity (ICC: 0.44-0.92) (Boscainos et al., 2003).
pre-treatment, week: 1, 2, 6
Changes in lumbar spine flexion range of motion with the Fingertip-To-Floor Test
Time Frame: Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 1, 2, 6
Range of trunk forward flexion will be assessed through the Fingertip-To-Floor Test. When performing the test, the examinee is asked to try to reach the ground with the fingers of their hands by leaning forward while keeping their knees and hips extended. The examiner measures with a tape the distance of the fingers from the ground. The test is widely used in clinical practice to measure spinal mobility and shows high reliability and validity indices (Ekedahl et al. 2010).
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 1, 2, 6
Changes in low back pain intensity with Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, week: 1, 2, 6
This tool is an eleven-point pain scale numbered from zero to 10. The left end of the scale corresponds to zero and is marked as "No pain", whereas the right end corresponds to 10 and is marked as "Maximum pain". Consequently, a higher value indicates more intense pain (Childs et al, 2005). The examinee is asked to choose an integer that best reflects the intensity of their pain. The NPRS is widely used to measure pain in both clinical practice and research, showing high test-retest reliability and high conceptual construct validity.
pre-treatment, week: 1, 2, 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Manual Therapy

3
Subscribe