The Investigation of the Effectiveness of Vibratory Stimulation on Upper Limb Function, Pain and Sensation in Patients With Stroke.

February 13, 2023 updated by: Yeditepe University
The objectives of this study cover both the vibration stimulation intervention and its outcomes. Patients with stroke frequently experience spasm in both the lower and upper extremities, which impairs sensory perception and motor function. This study aims to evaluate the effects of vibration therapy on the forearm and arm extensors of stroke patients and to report on changes in sensory perception and motor function measures. Although vibration therapy has lately been utilized to treat these limbs, there haven't been enough trials to determine how beneficial it is in the application procedure. This study aims to investigate the outcomes and effectiveness of a vibration therapy program administered to the extensor muscles.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

One of the major disadvantages is the loss of muscle strength in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Muscle weakness is caused after a stroke, followed by limited movement . Tactile and proprioceptive sensations are reduced in up to 65% of hemiplegic patients. Furthermore, pain, temperature, and touch are reduced. Because the ability to perceive these sensory features is impaired, recognizing objects by touch or exploring the environment can be difficult. Furthermore, it is stated that the senses are important and influence the recognition of skilled movements. A disorder has negative consequences for safety, natural hand use, the ability to maintain an appropriate level of strength while grasping without vision, and difficulties with object management. In this way, regaining motor control is a complex and time-consuming process. The increased unmasking of neural covert connections and the number of synapses in dendrites are two mechanisms by which the brain reorganizes itself. It has been observed that functionally relevant adaptive changes occur in the brain following an injury .Segmental muscle vibration (SMV) is a technique that uses a mechanical apparatus to deliver a vibratory stimulus to a specific tendon. As a result of the facilitation of muscle spindle primary ends, SMV provides Ia inputs. By managing intracortical inhibition and activating sensory inputs to the primary motor cortex, Ia sensory inputs facilitated by SMV can alter the activation of the corticospinal pathway. Transcranial magnetic simulation was used in a previous study after low-amplitude SMV was applied to the flexor carpi radialis muscle and inner hand muscles, and increased excitability in the primary motor cortex .While systematic data on improving human somatosensation are lacking, many accounts indicate that there is room for improvement. Furthermore, previous research on lesioned primates has shown that extensive training in touch, proprioception, and vibration improves even the most complex discriminating abilities. It also aided in the identification of the somatosensory cortex. As a result, the purpose of this study was to better understand the pure effect of repeated vibratory stimulation and its long-term effects two weeks after the last intervention session, when compared to the experimental or control groups.

In summary, studies in the literature have used a vibratory stimulation device to perform arm and wrist flexor motion therapy. This will be the first study to look at how vibratory stimulation of the forearm and arm extensor muscles affects upper extremity function, sensation, and pain parameters in hemiplegic patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ataşahir
      • Istanbul, Ataşahir, Turkey, 34755

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • no complaints of pain caused by induced vibration
  • >24 points in Mini Mental State Examination
  • Having a diagnosis of hemiplegia

Exclusion criteria:

• Other neurological problems, Parkinson's

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: stroke patients
individuals with hemiplegia after Hemorrhagic or Infarction stroke
The experimental group received a 60 Hz vibration stimulation treatment using the SMV method three times per week for two weeks (EG).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Box and block test (BBT)
Time Frame: 60 seconds
Box and block test (BBT) which is used to assess unilateral gross manual dexterity and functional abilities of upper extremity specifically for hand and wrist functionality. A simple, quick, and inexpensive test, it takes only a few minutes to complete. In the BBT, a wooden box is divided into two compartments by a partition, and 150 blocks are placed inside. During BBT administration, the patient is position at the table and asked to move as many blocks as possible in 60 seconds between two individual compartments which are equal in size. A client's score is determined by the number of blocks transferred between compartments within 60 seconds. The scores for each hand should be kept separately. Better manual dexterity is reflected in higher scores. When the BBT is being conducted, the evaluator should be aware of whether the client's fingertips cross the partition. In order to count blocks, this condition must be met.
60 seconds

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 minutes
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is used to measure the severity of pain in patients, it can also be useful at recording patients' pain progression, or compare pain severity between individuals with similar conditions.
2 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
monofilament test
Time Frame: 5 minutes
In the evaluation of light touch and pressure protective senses, monofilament is used to test sensory levels and detect diminishing and returning senses. This evaluation should be carried out in a very systematic manner. The therapist begins with the smallest monofilament and progresses to the largest filament in the correct order, but the test is stopped and the value is recorded when the patient detects the smallest monofilament being tested. It is applied to the anterior and posterior surfaces of the fingers from the first to the fifth, distal to proximal. This evaluation tool is made up of a series of monofilaments that vary in thickness and diameter. These monofilaments have gradient strengths ranging from 0.086 gm to 448 gm. These monofilaments are used to assess sensory impairment.
5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

March 2, 2023

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 26, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 26, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2023

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Thrive MD-01 .

3
Subscribe