A Study of Sleep Patterns to Determine Predictive Markers Due to Cardiovascular Disease in Elderly Patients

August 23, 2024 updated by: Amir Lerman, Mayo Clinic

Sleep Patterns as Predictive Markers of Hospitalization or Death Due to Cardiovascular Disease in Elderly Patients

The purpose of this study is to learn if there are predictive markers of hospitalization or death that can be found from data gathered from a Sleep Number® bed. This is a prospective observational cohort study that will follow participating subjects in the Masonic Homes/Acacia Creek Retirement Community in Union City, California.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Union City, California, United States, 94587
        • Masonic Homes of California-Acacia Creek
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants eligible for this study will be people who are living in the Masonic Homes/Acacia Creek Retirement Community in Union City, California and who have Sleep Number® beds that record their nightly sleep and physiologic patterns.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects living at Masonic Homes/Acacia Creek Retirement Community who use a Sleep Number® bed and are cognitively able to consent on their own accord.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who do not have a Sleep Number® bed.
  • Subjects without an internet connection to transmit nightly SleepIQ® data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 5 years
Total number of subject deaths due to medical conditions including congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and sudden cardiac death.
5 years
Number of subject hospitalizations
Time Frame: 5 years
Total number of subjects that required hospitalization due to medical conditions including congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and sudden cardiac death.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in daytime sleepiness
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Measured by Epworth Sleepiness Scale. The test is a list of eight situations in which you rate your tendency to become sleepy on a scale of 0, no chance of dozing, to 3, high chance of dozing. Total score is graded from 0-24. 0-7:It is unlikely that you are abnormally sleepy. 8-9:You have an average amount of daytime sleepiness. 10-15:You may be excessively sleepy depending on the situation. You may want to consider seeking medical attention. 16-24:You are excessively sleepy and should consider seeking medical attention.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in alertness
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Measured by alertness rating scale which ranges from 1-6 with lower scores indicating worse subject alertness and function.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in depression symptom severity
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) an 8-item participant-report measure for screening for depression and for establishing depression severity. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher score indicating greater depression symptom severity.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in sleep quality
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Individuals items within the index are rated on a scale from 0-3 with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptom severity
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Measured by Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale. The ADHD Self-Report Scale consists of 18 items designed to rate ADHD inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms. Each item is score from 0 to 4, with a total score ranging from 0 to 72 and higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in Verbal Memory
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Subjects are tasked with remembering fifteen words, presented one at a time, in a field that contains a total of thirty words (fifteen distractors). Subjects are tested at the beginning of the battery and again near the end. The verbal memory test measures how well subjects can recognize, remember and retrieve words. Low scores indicate verbal memory impairment.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in Visual Memory
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Subjects are tasked with remembering fifteen geometric figures, presented one at a time, in a field with fifteen distractors. Subjects are tested near the beginning of the battery and again at the end. The visual memory test measures a subject's ability to recognize, remember and retrieve shapes. Low scores indicate visual memory impairment.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in Motor Skills
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Measured by the Finger Tapping Test (FTT). The FTT tests motor speed and fine motor control. In it, subjects participate in three rounds of tapping with each hand; lowering scores indicate motor slowing.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in Processing Speed
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Measured by Symbol Digit Coding which draws upon several cognitive processes simultaneously (such as visual scanning, visual perception, visual memory and motor function). Subjects are presented with a simple grid, with numbers corresponding to a particular symbol. Sequences of symbols are then provided, which the subject must render in numerics. Low scores are indicative of slow processing speed, possibly due to cognitive impairment.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in Stroop Task
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
The Stroop Task measures how well subjects adapt to rapidly changing (and increasingly complex) sets of directions. Words for various colors (i.e. RED, GREEN) are presented in various font colors, which may or may not correspond (i.e. the word "RED" may be rendered in red, or in green). Subjects are tasked with responding under various conditions, such as when the word is rendered in the corresponding color, or when the word and the color it is rendered in are mismatched. Prolonged reactions times indicate cognitive slowing/impairment.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in Executive Function
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Measured by the Shifting Attention Test (SAT). The SAT measures executive function; specifically, how well a subject recognizes set shifting (mental flexibility) and abstraction (rules, categories), and manages multiple tasks simultaneously. In addition, subjects have to adjust their responses to randomly changing rule sets. Low scores are most indicative of cognitive impairments.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Change in Vigilance
Time Frame: Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years
Measured by the Continuous Performance Test (CPT). The CPT measures sustained vigilance and choice reaction time. Two errors may be clinically significant, more than four errors is clinically significant and likely indicates attentional dysfunction.
Baseline, every 6 months for 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amir Lerman, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 22-001110

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Subscribe