Clinical, Prospective, Non-profit, Non-pharmacological Study on Geass Healing Abutment: Microbiological, Histological, and Immuno-histochemical Evaluation.

February 22, 2023 updated by: Michele Paolantonio, G. d'Annunzio University

The health of peri-implant soft tissues is important for the long-term success rate of dental implants and the surface topography is pivotal in influencing it. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate, in human patients, the inflammatory mucosal microenvironment in the tissue surrounding a new, nanoscale, laser-treated healing abutment characterized by engineered nanopores versus a standard machined-surface.

The prospective clinical study will evaluate the effect of the presence of a laser-etched surface in the coronal portion of healing stumps in forming the coronal seal and reducing the accumulation of bacterial plaque around it. The screws will serve as their own control group since they have both a laser-etched and a smooth portion.

Primary objective:

To evaluate the adhesion of fibroblastic cells from the peri-implant mucosa on the surface of the healing stump through scanning electron microscope analysis, expressed in terms of the area covered by the cells.

Secondary objectives:

To evaluate the amount of bacterial adhesion around healing stumps with a laser-etched and smooth altered surface through scanning electron microscope analysis, expressed in terms of the area covered by the cells.

To evaluate the presence of hemidesmosomal structures through the expression of α-6 and β-4 integrins.

To evaluate bacterial adhesion on healing screws. To evaluate the healing of peri-implant soft tissues through clinical indices, such as Plaque Index and Gingival Index.

The healing period was 12 ± 4 weeks (T1) before the second surgical procedure, during which all healing abutments were placed. To prevent allocation bias among patients, each healing abutment was designed with two surfaces that alternated between laser-treated/machined and ma-chined/laser-treated. The experimental healing abutment was removed after 30 ± 7 days, which coincided with the soft tissue biopsy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • CH
      • Chieti, CH, Italy, 66100
        • G. d'Annunzio University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between 18 and 75 years
  • Patients with no systemic and/or oral health disease
  • At least six months of healing after tooth extraction
  • Adequate dimension of the attached gingiva (>2 mm) or keratinized tissue at the site selected and adequate residual bone crest

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patients with poor oral hygiene
  • Plaque score (PS) and bleeding on probing (BOP) more than 25%
  • Patients with active periodontal disease
  • Insufficient bone thickness for implant insertion and bone augmentation procedures
  • patients who necessitate immediate implant loading protocols
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Immune diseases
  • Patients who smoke more than 10 cig/die

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: laser/machined
on the same customized healing abutment laser-treated/machined surface treatments were repeated with the following order: Laser treated/machined/laser treated/machined. This order was performed to eliminate the bias of the different surface allocation on patients.

The second surgical stage was done after a healing period 12 ± 4 weeks (T1) where all the healing abutments were placed. Each healing abutment had repeated the two surfaces as twice follows: laser-treated/machined/ laser-treated/machined. Experimental healing abutment was removed after 30 ± 7 days, the same time as the soft tissue biopsy.

After the healing period (30 ± 7 days), before starting with the prosthetic restoration of the fixtures, an impression was taken of the small-diameter Has, and circular sections (diameter 5 mm) soft tissues around them were retrieved for analysis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
soft tissue adhesion
Time Frame: After a healing period of 12 ± 4 weeks, during the second surgical phase
To evaluate the adhesion of fibroblastic cells from the peri-implant mucosa on the surface of the healing stump through scanning electron microscope analysis, expressed in terms of the area covered by the cells.
After a healing period of 12 ± 4 weeks, during the second surgical phase

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bacterial adhesion
Time Frame: After a healing period of 12 ± 4 weeks, during the second surgical phase
To evaluate the amount of bacterial adhesion around healing stumps with a laser-etched and smooth altered surface through scanning electron microscope analysis, expressed in terms of the area covered by the cells.
After a healing period of 12 ± 4 weeks, during the second surgical phase

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2218102018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implant Failed

Clinical Trials on laser treated

Subscribe