Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence

Clinical, Radiographic and Aesthetic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence in the Anterior Maxilla

Immediate implant placement has been advantageous in terms of reduced treatment time and fewer surgical interventions. Given the fact that the level of buccal bone acts as a major prognostic factor for IIP, the indications for immediate implant placement were suggested to be limited to intact alveolar sockets.In recent years, many attempts have been performed to compensate for the alveolar ridge resorption in immediate implant placement in compromised sockets. The clinical outcomes of IIP with guided tissue regeneration and connective tissue grafting using papilla preservation technique in compromised extraction sockets has not been previously reported.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200011
        • Shanghai Ninth People's Hositpal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients in need of single implant replacement

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with anterior failing teeth (from cainine to cainine) with the presence of neighbouring teeth
  • sufficient bone volume to achieve primary stability at implant insertion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • with uncontrolled periodontitis
  • heavy smoker (>10 cigarettes/day)
  • unwilling to sign the informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
group1
socket with intact buccal bone plate
to use biomaterials to fill the jumping gap
to change the soft tissue phenotype by connective tissue graft
group 2
socket with damaged buccal bone plate
to use biomaterials to fill the jumping gap
to change the soft tissue phenotype by connective tissue graft
to rebuild the alveolar ridge convexity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mucosa recession
Time Frame: baseline to 1-year
The height of the crown was measured by a peridontal probe in mid-facial aspect. The difference of the height of the crown over time was calculated as mucosa recession
baseline to 1-year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
probing depth
Time Frame: baseline to 1-year
peri-implant probing depth detected by periodontal probe examined by a peridontal probe at six sites around the crown
baseline to 1-year
bleeding on probing
Time Frame: baseline to 1-year
percentage of sites with bleeding on probing examined by a peridontal probe at six sites around the crown
baseline to 1-year
Pink Esthetic Score (0-14)
Time Frame: baseline to 1-year
Seven parameters were assessed:mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft tissue color, and soft tissue texture. Each parameter was scored as 2,1,0.
baseline to 1-year
thickness of buccal bone plate
Time Frame: baseline to 1-year
the distance between the implant's facial contour and the outside surface of the buccal bone measured by cone beam computor tomograph.
baseline to 1-year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SH9H2022-136

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implant Failed

Clinical Trials on gap filling

Subscribe