Mechanical Determinants of Upper Limbs Oscillation During Gait (CLAPENDAS)

November 17, 2025 updated by: Istituto Auxologico Italiano

It is unclear why humans typically swing their arms during gait. To date, the debate on how to arm swing comes about (i.e. whether it is caused by accelerations of the shoulder girdle or muscular activity) is still going on. There needs to be consensus on whether the arm swing is actively controlled or merely passive and on why humans swing their arms during walking (i.e. what the purpose of arm swing is, if any). Suggested reasons include minimising energy consumption, optimising stability, and optimising neural control. Pathologies such as hemiplegia after stroke, Parkinson's disease, Cerebral Palsy, Spinal Cord Injury, and Multiple Sclerosis may directly affect arm swing during gait. Emerging evidence indicates that including arm movements in gait rehabilitation may be beneficial in restoring interlimb coordination and decreasing energy expenditure.

This project hypothesises that the arms swing, at least at low and intermediate walking speeds, reflects the body's Center of Mass (CoM) accelerations. Arm swing may thus depend mainly upon the system's intrinsic mechanical properties (e.g., gravity and inertia). In this perspective, the CoM is seen as moving relative to the upper limbs rather than the other way around. The contribution of major lower limb joints, in terms of power injected into the body motion, will be simultaneously explored.

The study aims to investigate the mechanism and functions of arm swinging during walking on a force treadmill. To simulate asymmetric walking, healthy subjects will be asked to walk with a toes-up orthosis to induce claudication and asymmetry in ankle power. In this way, it will be possible to highlight the correlation among arm swinging, ankle power, and the acceleration of the CoM in a 3D framework. In addition, subjects affected by unilateral motor impairments will be asked to walk on the force treadmill to test the experimental model and highlight significant differences in the kinematic parameters of the upper limbs.

The question of whether arm swing is actively controlled or merely passive and the relationship between arm swinging and the total mechanical energy of the CoM will be faced.

Asymmetric oscillations of the upper limb will be related to dynamic asymmetries of the COM motion, and of the motion of lower limbs. In addition, cause-effect relationships will be hypothesized. Finally, the dynamic correlates of upper limb oscillations will make the clinical observation an interpretable clinical sign applicable to rehabilitation medicine.

Results from the present study will also foster the identification of practical rehabilitation exercises on gait asymmetries in many human nervous diseases.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20145
        • Istituto Auxologico Italiano

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The subjects will be recruited in the proponent Unit on an outpatient basis, from a physiatric referral or from a local inpatient rehabilitation unit.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presence of claudication (spatiotemporal asymmetry between subsequent steps), at visual inspection;
  • unilateral motor impairments of one lower limb as a consequence of various pathologic conditions, such as (not not limited to): poststroke hemiparesis (ischemic or hemorrhagic), Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, unilateral amputation with prosthetic correction, surgical orthopedic interventions;
  • ability to walk for at least 100 meters without support; prostheses or orthoses admitted.
  • ability to wittingly sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • drug therapy underway up to three months before recruitment, with impact on balance and gait;
  • systemic pathologies or other sensory or neurological pathologies with impact on balance and gait;
  • Mini Mental State (MMSE) score < 24/30;
  • alterations in the passive mobility of upper limbs;
  • painful syndrome which could alter the locomotion;
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Healthy participants
At least 10 healthy participants aged from 18 to 60 years old with symmetric walking at visual analysis. Participants will be excluded if pregnant, if they present with pharmacologic therapies which could affect balance and walking, and if they suffered from (or presently present with) orthopedic or neurologic conditions potentially impairing walking.

Participants' ground spontaneous speed overground will be tested by means of the 10-meter walking test. Participants will be tested for their foot dominance by means of the Waterloo footedness questionnaire-revised. Participants will walk on a treadmill mounted on force sensors. The test sequence will be the following:

  1. Familiarization. Participants will walk on the treadmill with the belt running at increasing velocities up to their spontaneous walking velocity . Speed will be increased of 0.2 m s-1 every 30 s. A brief pause of around 1 minute will follow.
  2. Walking. Participants will walk at 0.4 m s-1 and 1.2 m s-1 for at least 30 seconds.
  3. Walking with a rigid ankle-foot orthosis. Participants will walk at 0.4 m s-1 and 1.2 m s-1 for at least 30 seconds with an ankle-foot orthosis on the dominant lower limb.

Participants will repeat the last point (n°3) with the ankle-foot orthosis on the non-dominant lower limb. A 3-min pause will follow each section.

Pathologic group
At least 15 participants with various orthopaedic or neurologic conditions (for example, post-stroke hemiparesis, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, unilateral amputation, surgical orthopedic interventions) will be enrolled. Participants will present a unilateral motor impairment, not preventing passive oscillation of the upper limbs.

Participants will walk on a treadmill mounted on force sensors. They will walk freely, under tight supervision, but without hanging to any support. The test sequence will be the following:

4. Familiarization. Participants will walk on the treadmill with the belt running at increasing velocities up to their spontaneous walking velocity . Speed will be increased of 0.1 m s-1 every 30 s. A brief pause of around 1 minute will follow.

5. Walking. Participants will walk at 0.4 m s-1 for at least 30 seconds. Participants will be informed a few seconds before the changes in belts' velocities with a verbal warning.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ankle joint power
Time Frame: Day 1
Joint kinematics will be recorded through an optoelectronic method as per the Davis anthropometric model. The 3D displacement of the markers will be captured using 10 near-infrared stroboscopic cameras. Joint power will be computed through the spatiotemporal synchronization of ground reaction force vectors and the joint centers of rotation. The sagittal plane will be only considered for the analysis. Joint power will be computed as the product of joint torque and joint rotation speed. Power will be defined as positive or generated when the joint moment and rotation speed shared the same directions (i. e., when agonist muscles are contracting while shortening), as negative or absorbed otherwise. Positive work will be computed as the integral of the generated (positive) power over time.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spatio parameter
Time Frame: Day 1

Step length: the sagittal distance between the markers put on the lateral malleolus of the posterior and anterior feet at the ground strike of the anterior foot.

The Step length is measured in meters [m].

Day 1
Shoulder and elbow joint angles on the sagittal plane
Time Frame: Day 1
Shoulder flexion-extension angle, Elbow flexion-extension angle. Angle is measured in degrees (deg.)
Day 1
Energy of the center of mass
Time Frame: Day 1
The changes in kinetic energy due to the forward (Ekf), lateral (Ekl) and vertical (Ekv) velocity; the changes of gravitational potential energy (Ep); the changes of the mechanical energy due to the vertical motion, Ev = Ekv+Ep; the changes of the total mechanical energy (Etot = Ekf+Ekl +Ev). Amounts of energy are measured in Joule/Kg.
Day 1

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time parameters
Time Frame: Day 1

Single Stance Time: for each lower limb, the time interval during which the limb determines vertical ground reactions equal to or exceeding 30 N.

Double Stance Time: the time interval during which, under both lower limbs, vertical ground reactions equal or exceed 30 N.

Time parameters are measured in seconds [s].

Day 1
The trajectory of the center of mass
Time Frame: Day 1
the trajectory of the centre of mass will be studied in the sagittal and frontal planes during the strides. will be measured in meters [m].
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luigi Tesio, MD, Istituto Auxologico Italiano

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Healthy subjects

Subscribe