Study of Different Gating Techniques for PET Image of Lung and Liver Lesions (PETGATQUANT)

September 22, 2023 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace

Study of Different Gating Techniques of Positron Emission Tomography Acquisition Focus on Lung or Liver Nodules. Comparaison on Phantoms and a Series of Patients

Lesions blurred by respiratory motion are common in fluorine-18 PET/CT studies. To avoid these artefacts, several standard gating correction technics are available. the investigator aimed to compare the impact of different gating techniques based on phase, amplitude, elastic-motion monitored with and without pressurre sensor device on standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVpeak) and uptake volume (UV) measurements on different sizes of pulmonary and liver lesions. The feasability of this study will be done using anthropomorphic coupled with a motion phantom and on a series of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

PET-CT images will be acquired on a Biograph Vision600 PET/CT, fitted with 26cm axial field of view and time of flight.

Phantom study will use an anthropomorphic TORSO phantom with a programmable motion phantom, mimicking respiratory motion (QUASAR). Spheres with various internal diameters will be introduce into the lungs (air density) adding an axial mechanical device simulating breathing movement of +/-20mm. Concentration in the spheres will be the same for all diameters. The background and liver activities will be approximatively respectively 38 and 14 MBq. This phantom will be a simulating patient only for lung lesions.

The investigator will compare 6 different PET acquisitions: standard 3min acquisition without movement as our reference of "trues SUVmax and UV", 3min acquisition with simulated breathing movement without any gating and 3min with respectively gating techniques based on phase, amplitude, elastic-motion monitored with and without pressurre sensor device.

Patient study will be on 50 consecutive patients with lung or liver nodules. 18F-FDG injection will be around 2.5 MBq/kg.

The investigator will compare 5 different PET acquisitions: standard acquisition with free respiratory movement as our reference of "trues SUVmax and UV", acquisitions with respectively gating techniques based on phase, amplitude, elastic-motion monitored with and without pressurre sensor device.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Monaco, Monaco, 98000
        • Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with lung or liver nodules

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presence at least of one hepatic or lung nodule

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the different gating systems in lung lesions visualization
Time Frame: Inclusion
Classification, based on a phantom and patients studies, of the different gating system in view of the volume and SUV (max and peak) modification for lung lesions
Inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the different gating systems in liver lesions visualization
Time Frame: Inclusion
Classification, based on a patients studies, of the different gating system in view of the volume and SUV (max and peak) modification for liver lesions
Inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Metastases

Subscribe