A Longitudinal Evaluation of Oculometric Measures and Clinical Assessment Over Time in PD Patients

October 28, 2024 updated by: NeuraLight

A Longitudinal Study to Evaluate the Correlation Between Oculometric Measures and MDS-UPDRS Over Time in a Cohort of Patients With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD)

This is a prospective study in a cohort of about 30 patients with Idiopathic Parkinson's disease, who will be evaluated with a clinical assessment and an oculometric examination during a time period with specific intervals.

This study aims to evaluate the correlation between oculometric measures and clinical assessment over time.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is an observational prospective cohort study, in a cohort of up to 30 patients with idiopathic PD. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that oculometric measures are able to detect patient deterioration faster than can be detected using the currently available clinical assessment tools. In addition, to evaluate the correlation between oculometric measures and Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) score over time ,in subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and who provide a signed Informed Consent. All patients will be assessed using MDS-UPDRS over a period of 9 months (4 assessments, at 0, 3, 6, 9 months). During this time period, every subject who consents will undergo a NeuraLight session including oculometric measurements and eye-tracking recordings using a novel software-based platform and an eye- tracking system (Tobii, CE-marked class B approved device) (approx. 30 minutes). The oculometric evaluation will occur during the first 3 months for every patient every 2 weeks (+3 days), and then after 6 months and 9 months from enrollment (+3 days), (9 tests in total). All assessments will be performed during a clinic visit unless authorized to be conducted remotely. During the study, the sponsor will be blinded to the private details of the subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 6423906
        • Movement Disorders Unit, Sourasky Tel Aviv Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women with idiopathic PD (Hoehn & Yahr scale 1-3)
  • Age between 18 and 85 years old
  • Normal or corrected vision
  • Ability to follow instructions
  • Willing and able to sign an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to sit for 30 minutes on a chair in a calm manner
  • Personal or 1st degree relative history of epilepsy
  • Additional neurological diseases
  • Drug or alcohol abuse (except for using medical cannabis during 24 hours prior NL examination date)
  • Pregnancy or a potential pregnancy (self-declaration)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PD patients
Men and women with idiopathic PD (Hoehn & Yahr scale 1-3) aged 18-85 years
NeuraLight software-based platform

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of saccadic latency over time as evaluated during visits
Time Frame: 12 months
Difference between saccadic latency (ms) as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p>0.05) over time during study period
12 months
Change of anti-saccadic error rates over time as evaluated during visits
Time Frame: 12 months
Difference between anti-saccadic error rates (%) as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p>0.05) over time during study period
12 months
Change of smooth pursuit speed over time as evaluated during visits
Time Frame: 12 months
Difference between smooth pursuit speed (ms)as quantified during each visit by the NeuraLight test measured using a statistical comparison of values (e.g. t-test, ANOVA), p>0.05) over time during study period
12 months
Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with saccadic latency
Time Frame: 12 months
The correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with saccadic latency (ms) measured using R-Square (high correlation>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation<0.2), p<0.05) according to the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) at visits
12 months
Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with anti-saccadic error rates
Time Frame: 12 months
The correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with anti-saccadic error rates (%), measured using R-Square (high correlation>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation<0.2), p<0.05) according to the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) at visits
12 months
Correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with smooth pursuit
Time Frame: 12 months
The correlation between MDS-UPDRS score and its parts with smooth pursuit speed (ms) measured using R-Square (high correlation>0.5, moderate correlation 0.2-0.5, low correlation<0.2), p<0.05) according to the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) at visits
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Using the retrieved data of collected NeuraLight oculometric measures for calibration of prediction models of MDS-UPDRS clinical endpoint
Time Frame: 12 months
Optimization of a feature selection model (Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)) on NeuraLight oculometric measures used for a logistic regression model of MDS-UPDRS with a relative root mean square error (RMSE) of <0.1
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tanya Gurevich, MD, Tel Aviv Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on NeuraLight

Subscribe