Evaluating the Efficacy of the Mediterranean Diet to the Low- Fermentable, Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, and Polyols (FODMAP) Diet in Treating Irritable Bowel Syndrome(IBS)

March 7, 2025 updated by: Prashant Singh, University of Michigan

Evaluate and Compare the Clinical Efficacy of the Mediterranean Diet to the Low-FODMAP Diet in Treating Irritable Bowel Syndrome

This study is being completed to determine if the Mediterranean (MD) and low FODMAP (fermentable, oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) diets are comparable in the effectiveness to treat Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

The study team hypothesizes that:

  • The low FODMAP and Mediterranean groups will achieve a similar improvement in abdominal pain
  • Both groups will achieve similar improvements in bloating, overall IBS symptom severity, and adequate relief

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with IBS-D (diarrhea-predominant IBS) or IBS-M (IBS with mixed subtype) diagnosed per Rome IV questionnaire and without any unexplained alarm features (rectal bleeding, weight loss, nocturnal symptoms, personal history of celiac disease, microscopic colitis, inflammatory bowel disease)
  • Aged 18-70 years at the time of screening
  • Weekly average of worst daily (in the past 24 hours) abdominal pain score of ≥3.0 on a 0-to-10-point scale
  • At least 80 percent compliance in daily questionnaire entries during the 7-day screening period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects adhering to any dietary IBS treatment such as the low-fodmap diet, or gluten-free diet, Mediterranean currently or within the past 6 months
  • Subjects with a known food allergy to eggs, seafood, peanuts, tree nuts or milk (subjects with lactose intolerance that are experiencing IBS symptoms while on a lactose-free diet will not be excluded from the study).
  • Subjects with a history of poorly controlled insulin-dependent or non-insulin-dependent diabetes
  • Subjects with a known history of organic Gastrointestinal (GI) disease (i.e., celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease or microscopic colitis)
  • Subjects with a history of an eating disorder requiring medical or behavioral treatment within the past 10 years.
  • Subjects with prior small bowel or colonic surgery (excluding appendectomy or cholecystectomy if over 6 months since these 2 procedures)
  • Oral antibiotic use in the past 3 months
  • Any planned significant changes in dietary or exercise regimen within 30 days prior to Screening or during the study.
  • Currently pregnant or breastfeeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diet low in all FODMAP groups
Randomized participants will eat this diet for 4 weeks (all meals and snacks will be provided). Participants will only eat the study food for this intervention. Participants will be asked to complete surveys, food diaries, and have blood and stools samples pre and post treatment.
Experimental: Diet - Mediterranean
Randomized participants will eat this diet for 4 weeks (all meals and snacks will be provided). Participants will only eat the study food for this intervention. Participants will be asked to complete surveys, food diaries, and have blood and stools samples pre and post treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants Who Are Responders Based on the Abdominal Pain Intensity Score for at Least 2 of 4 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Results reflect the participants who were weekly responders for at least 2 of the 4 weeks based on their abdominal pain intensity score. The abdominal pain score was a single-question, 11-point numeric rating scale in which 0 represented no abdominal pain and 11 represented the worst possible abdominal pain. Once per day, subjects reported their worst daily (in the past 24 hours) abdominal pain. A weekly responder was defined as a participant whose score decreased in the weekly average of worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours by at least 30% compared with baseline.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants Who Are Weekly Responders to Adequate Relief Symptom Assessment for at Least 2 of 4 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Results reflect the participants who were weekly responders based on the adequate relief symptom assessment for at least 2 of the 4 weeks. Participants provided a binary (yes or no) response to rate the adequacy of relief of global irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms at the start of the study and weekly thereafter. A weekly responder was defined as a participant who achieved adequate relief in symptoms in at least 2 out of 4 weeks of the treatment period.
4 weeks
Proportion of Participants Who Are Weekly Responders Based on the Irritable Bowel Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) Modified Version for at Least 2 of the 4 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Results reflect participants who were weekly responders for at least 2 of the 4 weeks based on their scores on a modified version of the IBS-SSS. This version of the IBS-SSS was comprised of 5 questions participants answered based on their stomach and bowels. The total score for this modified version of the IBS-SSS was 0-500, with 0 indicating no IBS symptoms and 500 indicating the highest amount of IBS symptoms. A weekly responder was defined as a participant whose score decreased in the weekly IBS-SSS by at least 50 points compared with baseline.
4 weeks
Change in Mean Score of the Irritable Bowel Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) Modified Version
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
The modified version of the IBS-SSS was comprised of 5 questions participants answered based on their stomach and bowels. The total score for this modified version of the IBS-SSS was 0-500, with 0 indicating no IBS symptoms and 500 indicating the highest amount of IBS symptoms. The results represent the mean change from baseline minus 4 weeks.
Baseline, 4 weeks
Proportion of Participants Who Are Weekly Responders to Bloating for at Least 2 of the 4 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Results reflect the number of participants who were weekly responders based on their abdominal bloating score for at least 2 of 4 weeks. The abdominal bloating score was a single-question, 11-point numeric rating scale in which 0 represented no abdominal bloating and 11 represented the worst possible abdominal bloating. Once per day, participants reported their worst daily (in the past 24 hours) abdominal bloating. A weekly responder was defined as a participant whose score decreased in the weekly average of worst bloating in the past 24 hours by at least 30% compared with baseline.
4 weeks
Participants Who Are Weekly Responders to Stool Consistency Based on the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) for at Least 2 of the 4 Weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Results reflect the participants who were weekly responders based on their stool consistency assessment for at least 2 of 4 weeks. A stool consistency weekly responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater reduction in the number of days per week with at least one abnormal stool. Stools that scored as 1 or 2 (hard stool) or 6 or 7 (liquid stool) on the BSS were defined as abnormal.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Prashant Singh, MD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Diet low in all FODMAP groups

Subscribe