Manual Therapy/Exercises vs. Physiotherapy/Back School vs. Waiting List in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

October 24, 2023 updated by: Andreas Michalsen, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Manual Therapy/Exercises vs. Physiotherapy/Back School vs. Waiting List in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain - a Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled trial for patients with chronic low back pain with two treatment arms and one waiting list control group. Primary outcome is pain intensity on VAS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 14109
        • Charité University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pre-existing and specialist confirmed diagnosis of chronic low back pain for at least 3 months prior to inclusion
  • Average pain intensity with at least 40 mm on the VAS from 0 to 100 mm and pain on at least 5 of 7 weekdays in the last 3 months.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Regular own exercise practice for the treatment of back pain (including yoga and other interventions)
  • Invasive spinal procedures within the past 6 weeks or planned within the next 10 weeks
  • Acute disc herniation (diagnosed within the last 3 months)
  • Congenital deformities of the lumbar spine
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Severe comorbidities
  • Pregnancy/lactation
  • Current participation in another clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Manual Therapy/Exercises
Three individual therapy sessions and nine group sessions manual therapy/exercises of 60 min. duration under the guidance of a trained therapist.
Three individual therapy sessions and nine group sessions manual therapy/exercises of 60 min. duration under the guidance of a trained therapist.
Experimental: Physiotherapy/Back School
Three individual therapy sessions and nine group sessions physiotherapy/back school of 60 min. duration under the guidance of a trained therapist.
Three individual therapy sessions and nine group sessions physiotherapy/back school of 60 min. duration under the guidance of a trained therapist.
No Intervention: Waiting List
Study arm 3 consists of a waiting list control group, combined with the offer to participate in one of the above mentioned interventions after 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in average pain intensity in previous week
Time Frame: 3 months
Intensity of pain in previous week as measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (0-100).
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline for back pain specific disability
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Use of standardized Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) to assess back pain specific disability. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest level and 100 is the highest level.
3 months, 6 months
Change from baseline in average pain intensity in previous week
Time Frame: 6 months
Intensity of pain in previous week as measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (0-100).
6 months
Change from baseline in pain bothersomeness in previous week
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Bothersomeness in previous week as measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (0-100).
3 months, 6 months
Change from baseline in pain medication use in the previous week
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Specific self-reported pain medication use in previous week.
3 months, 6 months
Change from baseline for health related quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Use of standardized Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest level and 100 is the highest level.
3 months, 6 months
Change from baseline for pain self-efficacy
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Use of standardized Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). The scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest level and 100 is the highest level.
3 months, 6 months
Change from baseline for work productivity
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Use standardized Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) to assess employment status and productivity. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest level and 100 is the highest level.
3 months, 6 months
Change from baseline for anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Use of standardized Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest level and 100 is the highest level.
3 months, 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and treatment adherence
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Identify and assess self reported and unanticipated adverse events over the course of the study as a measure of safety and treatment adherence.
3 months, 6 months
Treatment adherence (class/session attendance)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Assess treatment adherence according to attendance during 12 week intervention period.
3 months, 6 months
App via mobile phones
Time Frame: 3 times daily within baseline and 6 months
Use of an mobile app to assess back pain intensity, pain medication, practice time
3 times daily within baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NHKManual

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain

Clinical Trials on Manual Therapy/Exercises

3
Subscribe