Effects of Garston Tool and Neuromuscular Reeducation in Cervical Headache

Comparing the Effects of the Graston Tool and Neuromuscular Reeducation in Reducing Cervical Headache.

Patients suffering from Cervicogenic headache have restricted range of motion and pain which in turn causes functional disability and reduced quality of life. The aim of this research was to determine the effects of Graston technique to improve range of motion, function, and reduction of pain and in patients having Cervicogenic headache

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A randomized controlled trial in which Graston Technique and Neuromuscular Re-education technique would be applied on patients presenting with cervicogenic headaches by using different tools and the changes would be examined pre and post intervention. The participants fulfilling inclusion criteria would be randomly allocated to two groups. Both groups received different protocols and will be assessed on data collection tool on their first and last visit using Goniometer, Headache Disability Index (HDI), Neck pain Disability Index (NDI) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Participants of both groups will be pre-tested before the application of interventional techniques and post-tested after the application of respective intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Islamabad, Pakistan, 46000
        • Nazma

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: Minimum 20years- Maximum 50 years (Male/Female)
  • Unilateral pain
  • Neck stiffness and ROM restrictions
  • Pain exacerbated by posture and neck movements
  • Pain effecting QOL
  • Positive flexion-rotation test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Headache not of cervical origin
  • Congenital condition of cervical spine
  • Headache with autonomic involvement, dizziness or visual impairment
  • Inability to tolerate the flexion rotation test
  • Conditions contraindicated for graston technique

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Graston Tool
Graston instrument, 20 strokes per minute proximal to distal and 20 strokes per minute distal to proximal for a period of 3 minutes was given over the painful area. GT group protocol included the use application of IASTM along with the application of ice therapy at the end of the session. The assessment of patients was done at the initial and last visit before the completion of the treatment program. Three treatment sessions per week were given to each patient for a total of four weeks.
GT group protocol included the use application of IASTM along with the application of ice therapy at the end of the session. Using the Graston instrument, 20 strokes per minute proximal to distal and 20 strokes per minute distal to proximal for a period of 3 minutes were given over the painful area. Baseline values were recorded for demographics evaluation and episodes of pain onsets. The assessment of patients was done at the initial and last visit before the completion of the treatment program. Three treatment sessions per week were given to each patient for a total of four weeks.
Other Names:
  • Neuromuscular Re-education
Active Comparator: Neuromuscular Re-Education
General stretching and strengthening exercises for the neck muscles. The protocol of treatment for the NMR group included the use of the Neuromuscular re-education soft tissue mobilization technique (NMR) followed by active movements of the patient.
General stretching and strengthening exercises for the neck muscles. The protocol of treatment for the NMR group included the use of the Neuromuscular re-education soft tissue mobilization technique (NMR) followed by active movements of the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in pain on 10 points on Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 4th week
Time Frame: Baseline and 4th week

The Numeric Pain Rating Scale, is a validated, self reported tool assessing average pain intensity over period of last 24 hours. Possible pain ranges from 0( No pain) to 10 (Worst pain).

Change= (Week 4 Score - Baseline Score )

Baseline and 4th week
Change from Baseline in pain on 27 items on Headache Disability Index at 4th week
Time Frame: Baseline and 4th week
Headache Disability Index is a 27 items questionnaire that identify the limitations experienced due to headache. It includes questions to identify the frequency ranges from one per month, more than one but less than four per months, more than one per week and intensity of headache ranges from mild to moderate and to severe.
Baseline and 4th week
Change from Baseline in pain on 10 items on Neck Disability Index at 4th week
Time Frame: Baseline and 4th week
Neck Pain Disability Index is a 10 items questionnaire that identify the functional status of patients based on their conditions. it includes questions related to pain, personal care, reading, lifting, headaches, driving, sleeping , work, focus and leisure.
Baseline and 4th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nazma Namroz, Riphah International Univeristy, Islamabad

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

there is a plan

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervicogenic Headache

Clinical Trials on Garston tool

Subscribe