Overcoming Pain Through Yoga in the Military (OPTYM)

February 15, 2023 updated by: Erik Groessl, University of California, San Diego

Mind/Body Interventions for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain in Military Personnel

Our primary aim is to assess the feasibility of conducting yoga research among active-duty military personnel with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and/or Chronic Neck Pain (CNP). In addition, we will evaluate the yoga intervention preferences and refine an existing yoga intervention to address those needs. The study will prepare us for a R01 funded pragmatic clinical trial of yoga for CLBP and CNP in active-duty military.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In preparation for a full-scale study via a subsequent R01 proposal, our study objective is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a yoga RCT among active-duty military personnel with CLBP/CNP in military and community settings. The study will be conducted in two phases: Phase 1 (completed) involved obtaining IRB approval to conduct research in military settings, collecting qualitative data from stakeholders on attitudes and preferences for yoga interventions, and refining the existing Yoga for CLBP intervention for the needs of active-duty military and persons with CNP. Phase 2 will recruit and randomize 50 military personnel with CLBP or CNP to either active hatha or restorative yoga. Pain interference, pain severity, physical function, opioid medication use, and mental health outcomes are of primary interest. Mechanisms will also be studied.

The specific aims are as follows:

Aim 1: Evaluate and navigate barriers and facilitators for obtaining IRB approval to conduct randomized controlled intervention studies with active-duty military personnel.

Aim 2: Evaluate the acceptability of and preferences for yoga interventions among active-duty military personnel with CLBP/CNP.

Aim 3: Refine and modify the existing Yoga for CLBP intervention to address CNP, and the needs of active-duty military personnel.

Aim 4: Evaluate the feasibility of recruitment of active-duty military personnel with CLBP/CNP into a yoga RCT.

Aim 5: Evaluate the adherence of this population to the two yoga interventions. Aim 6: Obtain effect size estimates to inform power analyses for a full-scale RCT.

Accomplishing these aims will prepare us for an R01 proposal to study the efficacy of yoga for military personnel with CLBP/CNP in a full-scale randomized, controlled trial. To be successful and maximize the scientific knowledge obtained from an R01 study, it is crucial to first establish working relationships with military researchers, ensure that recruitment and randomized assignment are feasible, pilot test measurement strategies, and ensure that both interventions will be well-attended and have been optimally chosen.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92134
        • Navy Medical Center San Diego
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92121
        • UCSD's Health Services Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of CLBP or CNP > 6 months
  • Willing to attend a yoga program for 12 weeks
  • Willing to complete 3 assessments
  • English literacy
  • Have had no changes in pain treatments in the past month
  • Willing to not change pain treatments during study unless medically necessary
  • Have not practiced yoga more than 2x in the last 12 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Back or neck surgery within the last year
  • Back or neck pain due to specific systemic problem (e.g., lupus, scoliosis)
  • Severe vertebral disk problems,
  • Persistent sciatica or nerve compression > 3 months
  • Coexisting chronic pain problem (e.g., migraine headaches, fibromyalgia)
  • Serious or unstable psychiatric illness (e.g., psychosis, mania, episode, or substance dependence)
  • Major coexisting medical illness (e.g., cancer, COPD, morbid obesity)
  • Positive Romberg test (with or without sensory neuropathy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hatha Yoga
This arm will receive the active Hatha yoga intervention. Instructors lead participants through various yoga poses for 60-minutes, 1-2x weekly for 12 weeks, and daily home practice is recommended.
Classical Hatha yoga with influences from Viniyoga and Iyengar yoga. Both Viniyoga and Iyengar yoga styles emphasize modifications and adaptations including the use of props such as straps and blocks in order to minimize the risk of injury and make the poses accessible to people with health problems and limitations
Other Names:
  • Active
Active Comparator: Restorative Yoga
This arm will receive a restorative yoga intervention. Instructors guide participants through relaxation exercises, typically with eyes closed, laying down, and minimal movement 60-minutes, 1-2x weekly for 12 weeks.
Restorative Yoga is a slow-paced yoga style that emphasizes relaxation and includes very little movement.
Other Names:
  • Non-Active

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Interference
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) : Self-Report measure of pain interference and pain severity consisting of 14 items. The measure includes front and back body diagrams to describe areas of pain, four pain severity items and seven pain interference items rated on 0-10 scales, and one question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The pain interference score is the mean of the 7 interference items. The pain severity score is the mean of 4 severity items.

Scale scores are the mean of relevant items. Thus, scores range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating more pain interference.

assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Self-report measure consisting of 23 questions that ask about limitations experienced for a variety of daily activities.

Scale scores are the sum of items endorsed, thus scores range from 0-23 with higher scores indicating more back pain-related disability.

assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
BPI Pain Severity
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) : Self-Report measure of pain severity consisting of 4 items. The measure includes front and back body diagrams to describe areas of pain, four pain severity items and seven pain interference items rated on 0-10 scales, and one question about percentage of pain relief by analgesics. The pain severity score is the mean of 4 severity items.

Scale scores are the mean of relevant items. Thus, scores range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity.

assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Ten-item self-report measure to assess neck pain interference in daily life activities.

Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The items are summed and scores range from 0-50 with higher scores indicating greater disability due to neck pain.

assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AUDIT-C
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
The AUDIT-C is a 3-item alcohol screen that reliably identifies patients who are hazardous drinkers or have alcohol use disorders. The AUDIT-C is a modified version of the 10 question AUDIT instrument.
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR)
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Developed by Forbes et al., The Dimensions of Anger Reactions questionnaire consists of 7 items and has demonstrated strong internal reliability and concurrent validity with other existing measures of anger.
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Physical Measures: Grip Strength
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Grip strength will be measured with a hydraulic dynamometer. Two trials will be performed for each hand and the best performance will be taken for each side. The average of both hands is used for analysis.
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Physical Measures: Core Stabilization
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Prone and supine bridge positions will assess core stabilization. Participants begin on their elbows in the prone position with shoulders, hips, and ankles aligned. The supine position is tested next, with knees flexed 90 degrees and pelvis raised from the floor with shoulders, hips, and knees aligned. Assessors record length of time (120 seconds max) that each position is held in proper form.
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Physical Measures: Balance
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Balance will be measures performance on a one-leg stand on each side. Assessors record length of time (2 minutes max) that each one-leg stand is held in proper form.
baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Short-form 12 (SF12) - Physical
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

12-Item self-report measure on individual's views about their physical health.

Scores are scaled to range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better physical quality of life.

assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
HRQOL - SF12 - Mental Health
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Mental Component Score for the SF12

Scores are scaled to range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better mental quality of life.

assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) assesses the impact and severity of fatigue with 9 items. A score of > 4.0 constitutes severe fatigue.The measure has good psychometrics for pain disorders.

This is a 9-item questionnaire with questions related to how fatigue interferes with certain activities and severity according to a self-report scale. The items are scored on a 7 point scale with 1 = strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree. The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher the score indicate greater fatigue severity.

assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
CES-D 10
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Ten-item self-report measure on the frequency of mood symptoms. Scores greater than or equal to 10 indicate depression.

The 10 items are rated on a Likert scale from 0-3. Thus the total score ranges from 0-30 with higher scores indicating more depression.

assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported
The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) assesses and individuals ability to recover from stress or trauma. The measure consists of six items and has good reliability and validity.

The score is the mean of the 6 items, which are rated from 1 to 5. Scores range from 1-5.0 and higher scores indicate greater resilience.

baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
Self Efficacy for Chronic Low Back Pain Scale
Time Frame: baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months

A 6-item self-report measure of an individual's confidence in performing certain activities. Items range from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident).

The score is the mean of the items and ranges from 1-10 with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.

baseline, 12-weeks, 6-months
PROMIS - Pain Intensity
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) measure - Pain Intensity

The PROMIS Pain Intensity instrument consists of three items with 5 response options ranging from 1 ("had no pain") to 5 ("very severe") addressing how much pain the person experiences now and in the past 7 days. The raw score is the sum of the three questions, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum score of 15, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.

assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months; baseline and 12 weeks reported

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erik Groessl, Ph.D., University of California, San Diego
  • Principal Investigator: Ian Fowler, MD, Navy Medical Center San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R34AT009073-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Yoga: Active Hatha

3
Subscribe