A Comparison Study of the Perclose Proglide (TM) SMC System Versus Figure-of-8- Suture Technique for Closure of Large-bore Femoral Venous Access.

A Comparison Study of the Perclose Proglide (TM) SMC System Versus Figure-of-8- Suture Technique for Closure of Large-bore Femoral Venous Access. (PERCLOSE-PROGLIDE)

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two strategies for closing large caliber venous access in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures: compression with figure-of-8 suture versus closure with the Perclose-Proglide system.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a retrospective observational study that aims to compare two strategies for closing large-caliber femoral venous access in patients who have undergone percutaneous procedures.

The study's goal is to determine if there are significant differences in terms of efficacy and safety between the two closure strategies. Figure-of-8 suture compression is a well-established technique that has been used for decades to close large-bore femoral venous access, while the Perclose-Proglide system is a relatively new medical device that could have great utility for the closure of large-bore femoral venous access. By comparing these two strategies, researchers hope to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Perclose-Proglide system for closing large-bore femoral venous access in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: BRUNO GARCIA DEL BLANCO, PhD, MD
  • Phone Number: 0034932746135
  • Email: brunogb51@gmail.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have undergone interventional procedures and who have required the use of figure-of-8 suture versus Perclose-Proglide system closure

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will meet all inclusion criteria:

  • Adult patients aged > 18 years
  • Patients who have undergone percutaneous interventional procedures
  • Patients in whom the procedures have been performed with femoral venous access
  • Patients who have required large caliber pods ≥ 14 French.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients must not meet any exclusion criteria:

  • Patients who have required access with surgical exposure.
  • Patients who have required ipsilateral arterial access with a large caliber ≥ 14 French
  • Patients with previous vascular surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Perclose-Proglide system
Patients who have required Perclose-Proglide system in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure
Figure-of-8
Patients who have required the manual compression with figure-of-8 in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Major vascular complications
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of patients with Major vascular complications
30 days
Assessment of Major vascular complications
Time Frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Incidence of patients with Major vascular complications
Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of rebleeding
Time Frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Incidence of patients with rebleeding
Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Rebleeding
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of patients with rebleeding
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Death
Time Frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Incidence of dead patients
Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of Death
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of dead patients
30 days
Assessment of Death related to vascular access
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of dead patients related to vascular access
30 days
Assessment of Death related to vascular access
Time Frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Incidence of dead patients related to vascular access
Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of Hematoma
Time Frame: 24 hours
Incidence of patients with hematoma the venous puncture
24 hours
Assessment of Hematoma Size
Time Frame: 24 hours
Area in cm of the hematoma at the venous puncture in patients with hematoma
24 hours
Assessment of Vascular access point infection
Time Frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Incidence of patients with infection in vascular access point
Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of Vascular access point infection
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of patients with infection in vascular access point
30 days
Assessment of Urinary infections
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of patients with urinary infection
30 days
Assessment of Urinary infections
Time Frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Incidence of patients with urinary infection
Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of sitting-walking time
Time Frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Time in hours between the patient sitting and walking after the vascular access
Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Assessment of Technical success
Time Frame: 1 minute after closure performed
Technical success when complete hemostasis is less than 1 minute after closure strategy performed
1 minute after closure performed
Assessment of Clinical success
Time Frame: Discharge (assessed up to day 5)
Technical success in the absence of events after closure strategy
Discharge (assessed up to day 5)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PERCLOSE PROGLIDE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Closure Strategy with Perclose-Proglide system

Subscribe