Peritoneal Closure Versus Non Closure During Open Appendectomy

December 15, 2016 updated by: Bezmialem Vakif University

Peritoneal Closure Versus Non Closure During Open Appendectomy: a Randomized Trial

There has been no consensus over closure versus non closure of peritoneum during abdominal operations. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of peritoneal closure versus non closure over postoperative pain, early complications and life quality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There has been no consensus over closure versus non closure of peritoneum during abdominal operations. in literature, few reports suggested that peritoneal closure may prolong the operation time, may increase the costs and has a probable aggravating effect on postoperative pain. In addition, there have been some reports that suggest non closure of peritoneum may not increase the postoperative complications. The need of further studies to clarify the effect of peritoneal closure versus non closure on postoperative pain and life quality especially has been specified in some literature. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of peritoneal closure versus non closure over postoperative pain, early complications and life quality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34090
        • Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with acute appendicitis
  • age between 18-65 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • preoperatively diagnosed intraabdominal abcess
  • intraoperatively diagnosed free purulent fluid in abdominal cavity
  • pregnancy
  • malignancy history
  • mental retardation
  • chronical renal failure
  • chronical liver disease
  • diabetes mellitus
  • patients' denial of participation to study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Peritoneal Closure
open appendectomy with peritoneal closure
open appendectomy with peritoneal closure under general anesthesia for acute appendicitis
Active Comparator: Peritoneal Non Closure
open appendectomy without peritoneal closure
open appendectomy without peritoneal closure under general anesthesia for acute appendicitis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue pain score
Time Frame: postoperative day 1
visual analogue score for pain at postoperative day 1 via using 10 cm vas scale.
postoperative day 1
Surgical Site Infection
Time Frame: postoperative 30 days
Postoperative Surgical Site Infection in 30 days following surgery includes incisional infections and intrabdominal abcess
postoperative 30 days
Life Quality Score
Time Frame: postoperative day 10
Euro-Qol 5D-5L for assesment of life quality at postoperative day 10th
postoperative day 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operation time
Time Frame: intraoperatively
time from beginning of incision to closure of incision
intraoperatively
wound dehiscence
Time Frame: postoperative 30 days
fascial dehiscence during postoperative 30 days diagnosed via physical examination of sonography.
postoperative 30 days
postoperative mortality
Time Frame: postoperative 30 days
mortality in postoperative 30 days
postoperative 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Huseyin K Bektasoglu, MD, Bezmialem Vakif University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Appendicitis

Clinical Trials on open appendectomy with peritoneal closure

3
Subscribe