Effect of Different Doses of US in the Treatment of CTS

March 12, 2025 updated by: Omnia Gamal Mohamed, Cairo University

Effect of Different Doses of Therapeutic Ultrasound in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effective dose of therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome on pain level, functional ability, motor and sensory nerve conduction parameters and pinch strength.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is among the most common peripheral neuropathies causing the median nerve compression as it crosses the carpal tunnel, with an estimated prevalence of about 4 - 5% of the general population. Patients suffering from this syndrome mainly complain about paresthesia (pain, numbness, and tingling) in the innervation area of the median nerve in the hand which could be accompanied by weakness and atrophy of thenar muscles.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper limb and a significant contributor to hand functional impairment and disability that could be treated through numerous approaches. Effective treatment options include conservative and surgical interventions.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) remains a puzzling and disabling condition present in 3.8% of the general population. CTS is the most well-known and frequent form of median nerve entrapment, and accounts for 90% of all entrapment neuropathies.

Physiotherapy modalities are used to help patients with CTS in many cases. They can both help to improve CTS symptoms as well as resolve the cause of the syndrome. Physiotherapy intervention may include special exercises, mobilizations, ergonomic interventions and advice for as well as electrotherapy modalities, aiming for the treatment and improvement of symptoms.

Ultrasound waves have anti-inflammatory properties, stimulating nerve regeneration and improving nerve conductivity.

The most common uses for US are to decrease soft tissue inflammation, increase tissue extensibility, enhance scar tissue remodeling, increase soft tissue healing, decrease pain, and decrease soft tissue swelling .

The issue of selecting the nature of the ultrasonic wave has not been finally resolved. A continuous wave is more often used to reduce pain and increase the elasticity of the tissue, while a pulsed wave mode is applied to reduce swelling and to eliminate inflammation. The rate of absorption, and thus the thermal effect, is based on the tissue type encountered, the frequency of the ultrasound beam, and the intensity (W/cm2) of the ultrasonic output.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ismailia, Egypt
        • Ismailia Medical Complex

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject's age range was 25-55 years .
  2. Mild to moderate CTS, that is confirmed by neurologist or orthopedist based on results of physical examination and electrophysiological criteria; i. Mild CTS is characterized by sensory fibers involvement (sensory peak latency > 3.6 milliseconds) with no motor fiber involvement (motor distal latency < 4.1 milliseconds), provided that sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) is not absent.

    ii. Moderate CTS is characterized by involvement of both sensory and motor fibers, provided that neither of these two waves is absent .

  3. Pain intensity more than 5 in visual analogue scale (VAS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of any trauma on the hands, neck, and shoulders within 3 months of the study onset
  2. Cervical radiculopathy, peripheral polyneuropathy, or other neurological conditions.
  3. Patients suffering from severe CTS according to electrophysiological criteria

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control group
(control group) It consisted of 15 subjects who received a program of 'sham' US application, so that the US device was working but not delivering any output plus traditional PT treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome which included hot packs, tendon glide and nerve glide exercises, US treatment sessions were performed for 6 min per session, once a day, three days a week, for a total of 4 weeks.
The patients received traditional physical therapy treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, in the form of hot packs, tendon and nerve glide exercises, and wrist splint for 4 weeks.
US treatment sessions were performed for 6 min per session, once a day, three days a week, for a total of 4 weeks.
Experimental: Low-dose group
(low-dose group) It consisted of 15 subjects who received a program of US treatments that was administered to the carpal tunnel area with pulsed mode at a frequency of 1 MHz with an intensity of 0.25 W/cm2 and a duty cycle of 1:4 plus traditional treatment.
The patients received traditional physical therapy treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, in the form of hot packs, tendon and nerve glide exercises, and wrist splint for 4 weeks.
US treatment sessions were performed for 6 min per session, once a day, three days a week, for a total of 4 weeks.
Experimental: Mid-dose group
(Mid-dose group) It consisted of 15 subjects who received a program of US treatments that was administered to the carpal tunnel area with pulsed mode at a frequency of 1 MHz with an intensity of 0.5 W/cm2 and a duty cycle of 1:4 plus traditional treatment.
The patients received traditional physical therapy treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, in the form of hot packs, tendon and nerve glide exercises, and wrist splint for 4 weeks.
US treatment sessions were performed for 6 min per session, once a day, three days a week, for a total of 4 weeks.
Experimental: High-dose group
(high-dose group) It consisted of 15 subjects who received a program of the same US equipment that was set at pulsed mode at a frequency of 1 MHz, intensity of 1.0W/ cm2 and a duty cycle of 1:4 plus traditional treatment.
The patients received traditional physical therapy treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, in the form of hot packs, tendon and nerve glide exercises, and wrist splint for 4 weeks.
US treatment sessions were performed for 6 min per session, once a day, three days a week, for a total of 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
symptoms severity and functional status
Time Frame: Four weeks
Symptoms severity and functional status were measured by Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire. The patients rated their ability to perform the activity on a scale that ranged from 1 (no difficulty with the activity) to 5 (cannot perform the activity at all).
Four weeks
median nerve motor distal latency
Time Frame: Four weeks
Electrodiagnostic tests were used to measure median nerve motor distal latency in milliseconds.
Four weeks
median nerve motor amplitude
Time Frame: Four weeks
Electrodiagnostic tests were used to measure motor amplitude in millivolt.
Four weeks
median nerve sensory distal latency
Time Frame: Four weeks
Electrodiagnostic tests were used to measure median nerve sensory distal latency in milliseconds.
Four weeks
median nerve sensory amplitude
Time Frame: Four weeks
Electrodiagnostic tests were used to measure sensory amplitude in millivolt
Four weeks
Pinch strength
Time Frame: Four weeks
Pinch dynamometer was used to measure pinch strength
Four weeks
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Four weeks
Pain intensity was measured by visual analogue scale. Scores are based on self-reported measures of symptoms that are recorded with a single handwritten mark placed at one point along the length of a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between the two ends of the scale-"no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm).
Four weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ragia Mohamed Kamel, PhD, Professor, Cairo university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Traditional treatment

Subscribe