iTEST: Introspective Accuracy as a Novel Target for Functioning in Psychotic Disorders (iTEST)

February 24, 2026 updated by: Colin Depp, University of California, San Diego
People with psychotic disorders experience a high level of functional disability, and a major contributor to this disability is introspective accuracy, which is defined as inaccurate judgements of one's abilities and performance on tasks. Yet, no intervention has directly targeted introspective accuracy for psychotic illnesses. This trial will evaluate a new intervention, called iTEST, that uses mobile devices to train people with psychotic disorders to improve introspective accuracy and, ultimately, functional outcomes

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This NIH-supported clinical trial is the first phase of a two phase program, funded by Development of Psychosocial Therapeutic and Preventive Interventions for Mental Disorders, R61/R33. The overarching goal is to evaluate a new blended mobile intervention that is aimed at improving introspective accuracy (IA) in people with psychotic disorders, with the ultimate goal of improving functional outcome. Introspective accuracy is the degree to which one's self-assessment of performance or abilities corresponds with objective data. Recent research indicates that poor IA is an independent predictor of functional disability. Yet, there are currently no treatments that directly target IA. Basic experimental research and other lines of evidence suggest IA is malleable, and that improvement in task-based IA transfers to untrained tasks. This project's premise is that task-based IA training could be delivered in a remote mobile health format and coupled with coaching in applying improved IA to real-world functional behaviors, creating a novel avenue for functional rehabilitation in psychotic disorders. The investigators have developed and completed usability testing of iTEST, a novel blended IA targeted mobile intervention. iTEST integrates graduated drill-and-practice training in IA delivered on a mobile device with personalized coaching in applying IA to everyday compensatory behaviors. In the R61 phase trial here, the investigators will recruit people with psychotic disorders with at least minimal functional impairment. The investigators will conduct an open trial of iTEST, evaluating whether the intervention leads to clinically significant changes in task-based IA along with transfer to an untrained task (target mechanisms). The investigators will also determine the dose of intervention needed to achieve clinically significant improvement in IA targets, by evaluating change at 8, 12, or 16 weeks. The go/no go criteria for this trial are 75% adherence and clinically significant increases in introspective accuracy. A total of 60 persons who are diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder will be recruited into this trial

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • University of California, San Diego
    • Texas
      • Richardson, Texas, United States, 75080
        • University of Texas at Dallas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Voluntary informed consent to participate and capacity to consent as measured by the UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC)
  2. Age 18 to 65;
  3. DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder based on a structured diagnostic interview and available medical record review;
  4. ≥ 6th grade reading level on the Wide Range Achievement Test-4 Reading subtest (needed to read instructions on device);
  5. Stable co-treatments (no hospitalizations or medication class changes in 2 months before enrollment). The investigators will determine symptom and medication stability by best-estimate history with information from medical records;
  6. Availability of a clinician (staff member, case manager, other mental health clinician) or close associate (family member, friend) with at least monthly contact who can be their informant
  7. Minimum level of functional impairment based on milestones, excluding participants who are full-time employed and financially responsible for their household.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Greater than moderate disorganization on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (P2-Disorganization item >5)
  2. DSM-5 alcohol or substance dependence in past 3 months based on interview
  3. Level of care required interferes with outpatient therapy (e.g., hospitalized; severe medical illness); 4) Unable to adequately see or manually manipulate a smartphone.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: iTEST
iTEST is a computerized training intervention delivered on a mobile device that is coupled with individual contacts with a therapist/coach. The mobile components train in improving participant's ability to form accurate judgments about their performance and their rate of functional activities. The intervention involves coaching coupled with automated training that is delivered on a mobile device. The automated training involves daily cognitive tests in which the goal for treatment is to improve judgments of accuracy of self-assessment, and coaching is aimed at applying improving metacognitive awareness to every day activities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trained Introspective Accuracy
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 16 week follow up assessment
Introspective accuracy is measured daily basis from baseline to 16 weeks (average of introspective accuracy determined from self-reported estimated correct on the Variable Length List Learning Memory Test; Mobile Electronic Test of Emotion Recognition and actual correct). Each day, participants complete tasks in which the can obtain a number of correct responses in guessing the emotion depicted on a picture of a human face and remembering a list of words provided to them. Participants are then asked to guess how many items correctly identified and introspective accuracy is the absolute value of the difference between the guessed correct and actual correct. This number can range from zero to ten and lower scores reflect better introspective accuracy. There are two measures of introspective accuracy (one from a facial recognition task and the other from a word list task) and these are averaged within each day.
Change from Baseline to 16 week follow up assessment
Untrained Introspective Accuracy on WCST
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 16 week follow up assessment
The Metacognitive Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is a secondary measure of introspective accuracy and involves the completion of the standard neuropsychological task (WCST) with simultaneous questions about the participants judgment of correctness. The primary unit of analysis is the difference between self-assessed correct and actual correct responses. The WCST is a cognitive task that is administered by a trained rater. The scale would be the subtraction from a maximum of 64 correct and a minimum of 0 correct from the total guessed accurate (maximum of 64 or minimum of 0). Therefore the range of raw introspective accuracy scores would be from -64 to 64 and this score is then converted to an absolute value . Better introspective accuracy would be reflected by a score closer to 0.
Change from Baseline to 16 week follow up assessment
Adherence
Time Frame: Cumulative adherence over 16 weeks
Completion of daily mobile prompts divided by the number possible across 16 weeks of training.
Cumulative adherence over 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specific Level of Function Scale (Informant Version)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Assessment to 16 week follow up Assessment
The Specific Level of Functioning (SLOF) is an informant rated scale of functioning in the community. The measure includes 43 items that address current work, self-care, social and related functional capacities. The summary variable is the higher order functional factor which combines work, independent living, and social functional capacity. Each item is rated on a 1 to 5 scale where the maximum score is 5 and the minimum score is 1. The scale score is the average score rating (range of 1 to 5) with higher scores reflective of better functioning
Change from Baseline Assessment to 16 week follow up Assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R61MH129379-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

A condition of funding is that IPD is made available to other researchers through the National Data Archive of the NIMH. The investigative team will deposit and share data in the NIMH National Data Archive and the investigative team has budgeted staff time of 100 hours per year to accomplish the preparation, curation, and uploading of semiannual de-identified data as the study progresses (linked with Global Unique Identifiers) to the online system in collaboration with NIH staff. • The investigative team will develop documents and tools to support this dissemination, in particular for the sharing ecological momentary assessment data which presents data management challenges in its volume and complexity, including within-person aggregation scripts that can be used to analyze the data at the day and week level. IPD that will be shared include all de-identified study data

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be made available by September 2025, which is within 6 months of the conclusion of the award. This is consistent with NIMH policy on the timing of data sharing and data will be shared in perpetuity.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Individuals seeking data access it through the National Data Archive wherein access controlled by the NIH

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychotic Disorders

Clinical Trials on iTEST

Subscribe