- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05926843
Spinal Cord Stimulation Assisted by Motor Rehabilitation Training for Restoring Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury (NeuroSCS)
Evaluation of Spinal Cord Stimulation Assisted by Motor Rehabilitation Training for Restoring Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury: an Interventional, Prospective, Monocentric Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Milan, Italy, 20132
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of SCI from at least one-year post injury;
- Complete or incomplete spinal cord damage (ASIA grade A, B or C) conditioning chronic neuropathic pain and motor impairment
- Age > 18 years;
- Indication to spinal cord stimulation surgery for chronic pain;
- Be unable to stand or step independently;
- No current anti-spasticity medication regimen;
- No botox injections in the prior 3 months;
- Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study;
- Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits and other trial procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any person unable to lie still within the environment of the MRI scanner for the required period to perform the study and those where MRI scanning is contraindicated (i.e. metal clips, claustrophobia);
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
- Any significant psychiatric disease;
- Use of illicit drugs;
- Unstable medical condition without cardiopulmonary disease or dysautonomia that would contraindicate standing or stepping;
- Painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, contracture, pressure sore, or urinary tract infection that might interfere with stand or step training;
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Individuals with functionally complete/incomplete spinal cord injury
Individuals with functionally complete/incomplete spinal cord injury (ASIA grade A, B or C) who will undergo SCS for chronic pain
|
The first part of the study will involve a preoperative evaluation.
Participants' clinical history, neurological, neurophysiological and advanced brain/spine MRI examination will be assessed (Part 1).
Subsequently, participants will undergo spinal cord stimulation surgery which involves the implantation of a medical device (Part 2).
After the surgery, the research participants will be hospitalized at the Neurosurgery Unit (10 days) to monitor the incision site (Part 3).
Thereafter, the patients will be moved (for at least 6 weeks) to the Rehabilitation Unit in order to identify appropriate stimulation parameters for inducing stepping and standing and for starting training.
The combination of epidural stimulation with manual step/stand training will be thus evaluated (Part 4).
Patients will be finally assessed by clinical evaluation, advanced MRI and neurophysiological examination to study the brain, spine and peripheral functions after six months (Part 5).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Motor changes (MRC)
Time Frame: Before surgery, then monthly up to 6-month from surgery
|
The Medical Research Council's (MRC) scale of muscle power will be used to evaluate motor weakness.
The MRC scale of muscle strength uses a score from Grade 5 (normal) to Grade 0 (no visible contraction) to assess the power of a particular muscle group in relation to the movement of a single joint.
|
Before surgery, then monthly up to 6-month from surgery
|
|
Motor changes (LEFS))
Time Frame: Before surgery, then monthly up to 6-month from surgery
|
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) will be used by clinicians as a measure of lower extremity function.
It is a questionnaire containing 20 questions about a person's ability to perform everyday tasks (minimum score 0, maximum score 80).
|
Before surgery, then monthly up to 6-month from surgery
|
|
Hand-held dynamometry
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
|
Quantitative assessment of maximal voluntary isometric muscle force.
Measurements were performed only in muscles reaching MRC grade ≥3, corresponding to active movement against gravity.
The measured outcome was the maximal force generated during isometric contraction.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
|
|
IMU-based single-joint assessment
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
|
Quantitative kinematic assessment of isolated lower-limb movements using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs).
The measured outcomes were the peak hip flexion angle and peak knee extension angle during stimulation-assisted single-joint movements.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
|
|
Standing assessment
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
|
Functional evaluation of upright standing ability. Standing performance was quantified by:
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
|
|
Overground walking
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
|
10-Meter Walking Test (10MWT). Standardized assessment of walking speed over a 10-meter distance. The measured outcome was the time required to complete the test, from which walking speed can be derived. In motor-incomplete participants the test was performed in the OFF condition whenever feasible, whereas motor-complete participants were assessed during active stimulation. Six-minute walk test (6MWT). Standardized assessment of walking endurance. The measured outcome was the total distance walked over six minutes. Motor-incomplete participants were assessed in the OFF condition whenever feasible, whereas motor-complete participants performed the test during active stimulation. |
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spasticity changes
Time Frame: Before surgery, then monthly up to 6-month from surgery
|
The Modified Ashworth scale will be used to evaluate spasticity.
This scale grades the muscle tone from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe spasticity).
|
Before surgery, then monthly up to 6-month from surgery
|
|
Longitudinal neurophysiological reorganization (electromyography)
Time Frame: Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
Electromyography will be used to evaluate muscle response or electrical activity in response to a nerve's stimulation.
|
Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
|
Longitudinal neurophysiological reorganization (motor evoked potentials)
Time Frame: Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
Motor evoked potentials will be used to evaluate electrical signals recorded from the descending motor pathways or from muscles following stimulation of motor pathways within the brain.
|
Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
|
Longitudinal neurophysiological reorganization (sensory evoked potentials)
Time Frame: Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
Sensory evoked potentials will be used to assess electrical activity in the brain in response to sensory stimulation.
|
Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
|
Longitudinal brain and spine MRI reorganization
Time Frame: Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
Structural and functional brain and spine MRI analysis.
|
Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
|
Chronic pain changes (MPQ)
Time Frame: Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) can be used to evaluate a person experiencing significant pain.
It consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe.
|
Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
|
Chronic pain changes (PCS)
Time Frame: Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) assesses the extent of catastrophic thinking.
It assesses the extent of catastrophic thinking due to low back pain according to 3 components: rumination, magnification, and helplessness.
It is a 13-item scale, with a total range of 0 to 52.
Higher scores are associated with higher amounts of pain catastrophizing.
|
Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
|
Chronic pain changes (ASC-12)
Time Frame: Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
12-item Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12) evaluates presence of allodynia and hypoesthesia.
|
Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
|
Functional and neuropsychological assessment
Time Frame: Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
The WISCI II is used to assess functional status in patients with lower-limb disability; the SCIM to evaluate independence in activities of daily living; and the SF-36 to assess overall health-related quality of life.
Mood and emotional status is assessed using the BDI for depressive symptoms and the STAI for anxiety.
Apathy was assessed using the IDAS.
|
Before surgery and 6 months after procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Angeli CA, Boakye M, Morton RA, Vogt J, Benton K, Chen Y, Ferreira CK, Harkema SJ. Recovery of Over-Ground Walking after Chronic Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 27;379(13):1244-1250. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803588. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
- Jackson A, Zimmermann JB. Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord--restoring motor function. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Dec;8(12):690-9. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.219. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
- Sdrulla AD, Guan Y, Raja SN. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms. Pain Pract. 2018 Nov;18(8):1048-1067. doi: 10.1111/papr.12692. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
- Seanez I, Capogrosso M. Motor improvements enabled by spinal cord stimulation combined with physical training after spinal cord injury: review of experimental evidence in animals and humans. Bioelectron Med. 2021 Oct 28;7(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s42234-021-00077-5.
- Wagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
- Gill ML, Grahn PJ, Calvert JS, Linde MB, Lavrov IA, Strommen JA, Beck LA, Sayenko DG, Van Straaten MG, Drubach DI, Veith DD, Thoreson AR, Lopez C, Gerasimenko YP, Edgerton VR, Lee KH, Zhao KD. Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia. Nat Med. 2018 Nov;24(11):1677-1682. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0175-7. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
- Albano L, Emedoli D, Agnesi F, Romeni S, Losanno E, Toni L, Fossati V, Ciucci C, Gasperotti F, Cociani L, Zucco G, Pompeo E, Mura C, Carpaneto J, Tettamanti A, Castelnovo V, Padul JD, Mandelli C, Barzaghi LR, Alemanno F, Caravati H, Butera C, Del Carro U, Castellano A, Falini A, Agosta F, Filippi M, Iannaccone S, Mortini P, Micera S. Epidural electrical stimulation facilitates motor recovery in spinal cord injury involving the conus medullaris: A case study. Med. 2025 Oct 10;6(10):100706. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2025.100706. Epub 2025 May 27.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Neuro-SCS-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.