Study of the Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction in Women After Rectal Cancer Surgery and Analysis of the Impact of a Sexologist Intervention (RectSexQol)

November 27, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Limoges
RectSexQoL is a study aiming at determining the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery. It has the goal as well to analyse the impact of an intervention given by a sexologist to such patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The treatment of rectal cancer is multimodal combining surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Each therapeutic tool may affect the sexual life of treated patients.

The incidence of sexual dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer varies according to literature from 5 to 88%. This may be due to the lack of a common definition relating to sexual dysfunction making it difficult to compare results. On the other hand, it should be noted that all of the work related to sexual dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer is mainly interested in men. The sexual well-being of women treated for rectal cancer is based on the assessment and management of their sexual functions as well as that of their overall sexual health in a personalized manner. The establishment of a sexology consultation before and after such a surgical procedure could improve the sexual functions as well as the sexual well-being of these women. The main aim of our study is to evaluate the prevalence of sexual dysfunctions at M-1 (before treatment) in the two cohorts "here" and "elsewhere" in the context of surgery for rectal cancer in females. The second aim will be to determine the impact of sexology consultation in the cohort "here" in comparison to the standart cohort without any intervention called "elsewhere".

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Brive-la-Gaillarde, France, 19100
      • Brive-la-Gaillarde, France, 19316
      • Guéret, France, 23000
        • Recruiting
        • Guéret Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Youssef Souliman, MD
      • Limoges, France, 87042
        • Recruiting
        • Limoges University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Niki Christou, MD
      • Limoges, France, 87039
      • Saint-Junien, France, 87200
        • Recruiting
        • Saint Junien Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Denis Valleix, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • Diagnosis of stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma or rectosigmoid junction with anastomosis less than 15 cm from the anal margin
  • Surgical management, preceded or not by Radio-chemotherapy, with restoration of continuity
  • Age : over 18
  • Proficiency in French or English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current pregnancy
  • Significant cognitive/psychiatric disorders
  • Guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Cohort called "elsewhere"
cohort without specific care by a sexologist
in the cohort called "elsewhere" , patients will be treated according to standards of care, without specific care by a sexologist
Experimental: Cohort called "here"
cohort with an intervention by a sexologist
in the cohort called "here", after the diagnosis of rectal cancer, patients will be seen by a sexologist before any kind of treatment for rectal cancer. Sexual dysfunctions will be assessed by a sexologist. After the surgery of rectal cancer, the sexologist will see them again to assess sexual dysfunctions after such a management of rectal cancer. If there is any discovery of a sexual dysfunction or aggravation of a previous one or alteration of sexual life, the sexologist will help the patients to improve their sexual quality of life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and proportion of women with sexual dysfunction defined as a total FSFI
Time Frame: Month -1
Number and proportion of women with sexual dysfunction defined as a total FSFI ("Female Sexual Function Index") score greater than 26.55 at Month -1 (before any treatment) in the context of surgery for rectal cancer
Month -1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and proportion of women with sexual dysfunction defined as a total FSFI score greater than 26.55 at Month 6 and Month 12 after usual or specific management in the context of surgery for rectal cancer
Time Frame: Month 12
Number and proportion of women with sexual dysfunction defined as a total FSFI ("Female Sexual Function Index") score greater than 26.55 at Month 6 and Month 12 after usual ("elsewhere" cohort) or specific management (duration of 6 months) ("here" cohort, including consultations by a sexologist supervising the surgical procedure) in the context of surgery for rectal cancer
Month 12
Change in the score of the "satisfaction" dimension of the FSFI scale between Month -1, Month 6 and Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Change in the score of the "satisfaction" dimension of the FSFI scale between Month -1, Month 6 and Month 12
Month 12
Differences (Month 6 - Month -1 and Month 12 - Month 6) in the score of the "satisfaction" dimension of the FSFI scale (Q14-Q16) between the groups with and without treatment by a sexologist (cohort here vs. elsewhere)
Time Frame: Month 12
Differences (Month 6 - Month -1 and Month 12 - Month 6) in the score of the "satisfaction" dimension of the FSFI scale (Q14-Q16) between the groups with and without treatment by a sexologist (cohort here vs. elsewhere)
Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sexuality

Clinical Trials on standart of care

Subscribe