High Intensity Aerobic Interval Training Versus Continuous Training in Heart Failure Patients.

March 4, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of High Intensity Aerobic Interval Training Versus Continuous Training in Heart Failure Patients.

To determine the effect of high intensity aerobic interval training versus continuous aerobic training in heart failure patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 44000
        • Railway General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with heart failure including both male and female
  • Patients who can perform 6 MWT.
  • According to classification of American heart association, class 1 heart failure patients are included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heart failure patients along with orthopedic problems.
  • Patients who have use pacemaker.
  • Patient who have recent acute myocardial infraction or revascularization less than 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High Intensity interval Training

High Intensity interval Training

  • Frequency: 3-5 day per week
  • Intensity: 60 to 80% of HRR. If atrial fibrillation present use RPE of 11-14 on a 6-20 scale.
  • Time: total 30 mint time.6 mint exercise with high intensity and 2 mints of low intensity for active recovery until 30 mints complete.

Type: walking and static cycling. Walking

  • Frequency 3 -5 days per week Intensity : use RPE of 11-14.
  • Time:30 mint total. 6 mint walk with high intensity and 2 mint walk with low intensity until 30mints completed.
Active Comparator: Continuous Aerobic training

Continuous Aerobic training

  • Frequency : 3-5 days per week.
  • Intensity:40-70% of HHR.
  • Time : initial 5-10 then 10-15 until 30mints without rest interval
  • Type : walking and static cycling.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6MWT Distance
Time Frame: 8 week
Changes from the baseline, 6 min walk test was used to measure Functional capacity. It is a sub maximal exercise test which can aid in assessing functional capacity of patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, in this test we find out the maximum distance in meters which an individual covers in 6 min.
8 week
Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 week
MLWHFQ is commonly used health related quality of life questionnaires with heart failure. This is very easy to apply on patients and self-administered questionnaire. It has two components emotional and physical and total score. Each item is scored in a 6.likert scale (0 to 5), thus, the total score could range from 5 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health related quality of life. Changes from the basline will be measured
8 week
Pulse Rate
Time Frame: 8 week
Changes from baseline, Pulse rate was measured per minute through pulse oximeter
8 week
Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)
Time Frame: 8 week
Changes from baseline SPO2 was measured in percentage. Oxygen immersion is the division of oxygen-soaked hemoglobin with respect to add up to hemoglobin in the blood. Pulse oximeter measure it.
8 week
Modified Borg dyspnea scale
Time Frame: 8 week
Changes from the Baseline, It is a subjective numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no dyspnea" and 10 indicates "unbearable dyspnea." A number is chosen by the patient in order to decide the best score that matches his level of dyspnea during physical activity.
8 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muhammad Iqbal Tariq, PhD*, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/01653 Hafiza Misbah Inayat

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on High Intensity interval Training

Subscribe