- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05964140
The MANTRA Trial (MANdibular TRauma and Antibiotic Use) (MANTRA)
Should we Use Post-operative Antibiotics Following Surgery for Patients With Mandible Fractures? The MANTRA Trial (MANdibular TRauma and Antibiotic Use)
- FULL TITLE OF THE PROJECT Should we use post-operative antibiotics following surgery for patients with mandible fractures? The MANTRA trial (MANdibular TRauma and Antibiotic use)
- SUMMARY OF RESEARCH (ABSTRACT) Research Question: Are post-operative antibiotics required following surgery for patients with mandible fractures? Background: Mandible fractures are the commonest facial fractures needing surgery and account for a significant percentage of the acute workload in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) units. The UK records over 6000 new cases per year. Patients having surgery for mandible fractures have a theoretical risk of developing surgical site infection, due to the proximity of the fracture lines to the oral cavity microbes and the presence of foreign body (titanium fixation miniplates). For this reason, clinicians often prescribe antibiotics after surgery, to reduce the risk of infection. Previous systematic reviews and a multicentre cohort study performed by this team, revealed significant clinical variation in post-operative antibiotic prescription amongst UK OMFS clinicians and the presence of clinical equipoise. Antibiotic overuse can lead to antibiotic resistance and other antibiotic-related side effects; judicious antibiotic use and stewardship is of paramount importance.
Aim: To determine whether post-operative antibiotics are required at all, following surgery for mandible fractures, and, if so, what is the most clinically- and cost-effective regimen
Objectives:
Primary Objective To conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial (MANTRA) in order to establish the non-inferiority (or not) of not giving post-operative antibiotics versus 2 other post-operative antibiotic regimens. An internal pilot phase will optimise recruitment and retention.
Secondary Objectives
- Measure the cost-effectiveness of the proposed antibiotic pathways
- Assess patient and clinician acceptability to change clinical practice
- Process evaluation to inform dissemination and implementation Methods: The investigators designed and propose the MANTRA RCT to compare 3 post-operative antibiotic approaches to prevent Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) following surgery for mandible fractures. The MANTRA trial is a large open label, multicentre study in NHS OMFS units. The 3 study arms represent the most common clinical pathways in the UK based on previous work; the control group is the approach prescribed by most UK OMFS clinicians. All patients will receive 1 dose of IV antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 1.2g, if no penicillin allergy, which is the most commonly used prophylactic antibiotic currently) on induction of anaesthesia, prior to their surgery.
The participants will be randomised to the following (1:1:1):
Group A: No further antibiotics Group B: 2 further postoperative IV doses of co-amoxiclav 1.2g Group C: 2 further postoperative IV doses (as above), followed by a 5-day course of oral co-amoxiclav 625mg every 8 hours if no penicillin allergy (Control).
Trial processes will be optimised by an internal pilot phase ensuring we recruit, randomise, and retain participants with clear progression criteria. We will also conduct cost-effectiveness analyses and process evaluation for dissemination and implementation
Timeline:
Start of grant: 1st July 2023 Start of RCT / pilot: 1st January 2024 End of pilot: 30th June 2024 End of recruitment: 31st December 2026 End of follow-up: 30th June 2027 Completion: 31st December 2027
Impact and dissemination:
- Practice changing outputs that standardise the use of antibiotics in mandible fractures in the NHS and provide a framework for other surgical prophylaxis research
- A bespoke clinical dissemination plan via an engagement and training legacy
- Cost-effectiveness data to inform policy making
- A research legacy and change of culture in the specialty of OMFS
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Panayiotis Kyzas
- Phone Number: +447505402640
- Email: Panayiotis.Kyzas@elht.nhs.uk
Study Locations
-
-
Lancashire
-
Blackburn, Lancashire, United Kingdom, BB2 3HH
- Recruiting
- East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
-
Contact:
- Panayiotis Kyzas
- Phone Number: 07505402640
- Email: Panayiotis.Kyzas@elht.nhs.uk
-
Blackburn, Lancashire, United Kingdom, BB2 3HH
- Not yet recruiting
- East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
-
Contact:
- Panayiotis Kyzas
- Phone Number: 07505402640
- Email: Panayiotis.Kyzas@elht.nhs.uk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
All adult patients aged 18 years or over with mandible fractures requiring surgery. Most of these patients will be identified from the A&E department via the on-call OMFS team or seen in dedicated OMFS trauma clinics. A small proportion of our study population will be seen in an OMFS clinic following referral from GP/GDP.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Age≥18 years
- Hospital episode of mandible fracture(s)
- Planned treatment is surgery - (ORIF with titanium miniplates)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Isolated mandibular condylar fractures
- Existing fracture site infection
- Immunocompromised (transplant patients, haematological malignancies, HIV/AIDS) - a clear definition will be provided in the protocol
- Pathological fracture (e.g., malignancy, osteoradionecrosis, cysts, Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws [MRONJ])
- Fractures open to skin
- Inability to provide written informed consent
- Other injuries or infections mandating ongoing post-operative antibiotics (e.g., panfacial fractures with mandible fracture component)
- Patients allergic to first and second-line antibiotic prophylaxis (as outlined above)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A
Group A: One induction IV dose
|
The 3 study arms represent the most common antibiotic regimens used in current clinical practice following surgery for mandible fractures. The control group is the most common approach. All patients will receive 1 dose of IV antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 1.2g), if no penicillin allergy, on induction of anaesthesia, prior to their surgery. The participants will be randomised to the following (1:1:1): Group A: No further antibiotics Group B: 2 further postoperative IV doses of co-amoxiclav 1.2g Group C: 2 further postoperative IV doses (as above), followed by a 5-day course of oral co-amoxiclav 625mg every 8 hours if no penicillin allergy (Control). |
|
Experimental: Group B
Group B: One induction IV dose and 2 further postoperative IV doses
|
The 3 study arms represent the most common antibiotic regimens used in current clinical practice following surgery for mandible fractures. The control group is the most common approach. All patients will receive 1 dose of IV antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 1.2g), if no penicillin allergy, on induction of anaesthesia, prior to their surgery. The participants will be randomised to the following (1:1:1): Group A: No further antibiotics Group B: 2 further postoperative IV doses of co-amoxiclav 1.2g Group C: 2 further postoperative IV doses (as above), followed by a 5-day course of oral co-amoxiclav 625mg every 8 hours if no penicillin allergy (Control). |
|
Active Comparator: Group C
Group C: One IV dose of antibiotics on induction and 2 further postoperative IV doses (as above), followed by a 5-day course of oral co-amoxiclav 625mg every 8 hours if no penicillin allergy
|
The 3 study arms represent the most common antibiotic regimens used in current clinical practice following surgery for mandible fractures. The control group is the most common approach. All patients will receive 1 dose of IV antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 1.2g), if no penicillin allergy, on induction of anaesthesia, prior to their surgery. The participants will be randomised to the following (1:1:1): Group A: No further antibiotics Group B: 2 further postoperative IV doses of co-amoxiclav 1.2g Group C: 2 further postoperative IV doses (as above), followed by a 5-day course of oral co-amoxiclav 625mg every 8 hours if no penicillin allergy (Control). |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Site Infection
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Incidence of Surgical Site Infection (CDC definition) following surgery for mandible fractures
|
30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hospital readmission
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
|
Return to theatre within 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
|
|
Death and cause of death
Time Frame: 14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
|
|
Malunion: fracture non-healing
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Fibrous union, fracture mobility, absence of callus formation
|
180 days
|
|
Malocclusion: teeth not meeting as they should
Time Frame: 180 days
|
When the fracture reduction failed to restore the dental occlusion
|
180 days
|
|
Metalwork removal
Time Frame: 14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
When the fixation titanium miniplates need to be removed at any point and for any reason
|
14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
|
Overall antibiotic exposure
Time Frame: 14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
|
|
Antibiotic related adverse events/serious adverse events
Time Frame: 14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
|
|
Cost
Time Frame: 14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
|
|
HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
Health Related Quality of Life
|
14 days, 30 days, 180 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Panayiotis Kyzas, PhD, Consultant OMFS H&N Surgeon ELHT
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Postoperative Complications
- Pathologic Processes
- Infections
- Fractures, Bone
- Craniocerebral Trauma
- Trauma, Nervous System
- Wound Infection
- Facial Injuries
- Jaw Fractures
- Maxillofacial Injuries
- Skull Fractures
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Surgical Wound Infection
- Mandibular Fractures
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
Other Study ID Numbers
- DEV008
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mandible Fracture
-
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing DocumentationAOCMFCompletedBilateral Condylar Fracture of the MandibleUnited States, Taiwan, Switzerland, South Africa, Finland, Slovenia, Pakistan, Spain, Germany, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Ukraine, Uruguay
-
Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustCompletedCondylar Process of Mandible Open FractureUnited Kingdom
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingTo Assess the Bone Healing in Fracture Mandible DefectsPakistan
-
Stryker CraniomaxillofacialCompletedMandible; Deformity | Mandible Fracture | Mandibular Fractures | MANDIBLE | Orthognathic Surgical ProceduresUnited States
-
Hennepin Healthcare Research InstituteUniversity of Minnesota; Regions HospitalCompletedSmoking | Inflammation | Surgery | Surgery--Complications | Wound Infection | Oxidative Stress | Wound | Mandible Fracture | Mandibular Fractures | Vitamin C Deficiency | Ascorbic Acid Deficiency | Wound Complication | Wound of Skin | Wound Dehiscence | Mandible Open Fracture | Mandible Closed FractureUnited States
-
Sohag UniversityActive, not recruitingMaxillofacial Injuries | Maxillofacial Trauma | Subcondylar Process of Mandible Closed Fracture | Orbital Floor (Blow-Out) Closed Fracture | Frontal Sinus FractureEgypt
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandible Fracture | Mandibular Fracture TraumaEgypt
-
Alexandria UniversityRecruitingMandible FractureEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownMandibular Fractures | Fracture MandibleEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Different post-operative antibiotic regimens following surgical treatment of mandible fractures
-
University Clinical Centre of KosovaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of MedicineUnknownType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | PeriodontitisKosovo
-
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant...Incyte Corporation; National Marrow Donor ProgramRecruitingLymphoma | Myelofibrosis | MDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome) | Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) | CLL (Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia) | Acute Leukemia (Category) | Acute Lymphoid Leukemia (ALL) | Prolymphocyctic Leukemia | Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) | CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia) | AML (Acute...United States
-
Minia UniversityCompletedPeriodontitis | Splints | Minimally Invasive Treatment | Stage IV PeriodontitisEgypt