Sexual Education in Women Based On The Plissit Model On Awareness And Attitude in Midwifery Students

July 21, 2023 updated by: yasemin hamlacı başkaya, Sakarya University

The Effect of Sexual Education in Women With Gynecological Cancer Based On The Plissit Model On Awareness And Attitude in Midwifery Students: A Randomised Controlled Study

In this study, it was aimed to determine the awareness levels and attitudes of the students with the sexual counseling training conducted in line with the PLISSIT model. This experimental (randomized-controlled) study was conducted with midwifery students who agreed to participate in the study and met the inclusion criteria at a state university in western Turkey. As a result of the randomization, there were 38 students in the intervention group and 36 students in the control group. While training based on the PLISSIT framework was given to the intervention group, no training was given to the control group. Data were collected through the Introductory Information Form, the Gynecological Cancer Awareness Scale (GCPS), and the Sexual Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (CTİÖ) before the training and after the completion of the 3 trainings.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Intervention In order to improve the educational content, researchers conducted a literature review on gynecological cancers, sexual problems in gynecological cancer, sexual counseling. The training content was created after the literature review.

Gynecological cancers are malignant diseases of the ovaries, cervix, endometrium, vulva, vagina and fallopian tubes that make up the female reproductive system. GLOBACAN (Global Cancer Observatory) 2020 data show that gynecological cancers rank fourth among the most common types of cancer among women in the world. Gynecological cancers are responsible for more than 100,000 incidences and 32,000 deaths per year. Significant changes are taking place, especially in the area of sexuality. It is known that sexually active gynecological cancer cases often complain of dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, postcoital bleeding, deterioration in sexual arousal, lack of sexual desire, genitopelvic pain. In addition, changes in the female genital organs, such as vaginal stenosis, vaginal dryness, scar formation in the vagina and vaginal atrophy, can lead to sexual dysfunction. Sexual dysfunction is one of the most common and troubling qualities of life issues faced by women with gynecological cancer, but it is rarely discussed among cancer patients, survivors, and health professionals. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of sexual health from the first visit of patients should be carried out as a routine part of each examination. In this regard, health professionals need to apply resources that will encourage effective, sensitive, communication with patients about sexual health problems. One of the most widely used interventions in the field of assessing and managing sexual problems is the PLISSIT model. The PLISSIT model provides a safe, tolerant and therapeutic environment for the discussion of sexual concerns, encouraging referral to an appropriate specialist as needed. The model consists of four steps to address sexual concerns: Consent, Limited Information, Specific Recommendations, and Intensive Therapy. The first stage of this model is to allow patients to share their thoughts and concerns about their sex life. In the second stage, individuals are informed about their thoughts and concerns about their sex life. In the third stage, patients are given "special recommendations". Specific recommendations should be appropriate to each person's individual needs. At this point, health professionals need to know more about sexuality in order to give patient-specific information. The fourth stage involves the referral of the patient to the relevant specialist. This model enables healthcare professionals to develop effective strategies for addressing sexual concerns. In order for the model to be applied effectively, it is essential that the relevant health professionals are informed about the subject. In this context, it is very important to show health professionals and students studying in the field of health that sexuality is very important in women with gynecological cancer, to raise their awareness in the field and to ensure that their positive attitudes towards sexuality are formed. For this reason, in this study, 3rd-year students of the midwifery department were trained on "sexuality education for women with gynecological cancer" prepared based on the PLISSIT model, and it was examined how the gynecological cancer awareness and sexual attitudes and beliefs of the students were affected.

In this study, it is aimed to determine the effect of sexuality education in line with the PLISSIT model on the gynecological cancer awareness levels of the students and their sexual attitudes and beliefs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sakarya, Turkey
        • Sakarya University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a midwifery 3rd year student,
  • Agree to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

-Having failed or not taken the "Gynecology" course even though it is a third year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group

Training to the intervention group was carried out in 3 sessions of 45 minutes each week, organized by the first author (AD). In each session, training was organized based on the PLISSIT framework.

Questionnaires (Introductory individual form, Gynecological cancer awareness scale and Sexual Attitudes and Beliefs Scale) were completed by students included in the intervention and control groups at the beginning and one month after the completion of the 3 training sessions.

Training to the intervention group was carried out in 3 sessions of 45 minutes each week, organized by the first author (AD). In each session, training was organized based on the PLISSIT framework.
No Intervention: Control group
The students in the control group were not given any training within the scope of the study, and they only had knowledge about gynecological cancers and sexuality, which are included in the course content of gynecological diseases. However, in order to comply with ethical principles, training information was provided online to the control group after the study data collection process was completed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gynecological cancer awareness scale change
Time Frame: pre-intervention, 1 month after intervention
Scale; It consists of four sub-dimensions: routine control and awareness of serious disease perception in gynecological cancers, awareness of gynecological cancer risks, awareness of prevention from gynecological cancers and early diagnosis and information awareness in gynecological cancers.
pre-intervention, 1 month after intervention
Sexual Attitudes and Beliefs Scale Change
Time Frame: pre-intervention, 1 month after intervention
high scores from scale items and grand total; It shows that negative beliefs and attitudes towards evaluating the patient's sexuality/providing sexual counseling increase and there are more obstacles in evaluating sexual problems and providing counseling.
pre-intervention, 1 month after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ahsen DEMİRHAN KAYACIK, Sakarya University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Education based on the PLISSIT model

Subscribe