Complexity and Frailty in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia (CAfCA). Prospective Multicentric Observational Study (CAfCA)

March 4, 2024 updated by: Federico Piccioni, Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome characterized by a decline in physiological homeostatic reserve, which translates into an increased susceptibility to adverse events and unfavorable outcomes following even small exposures to physical, physiological or psychosocial stress.

In the European population up to 69 years, the prevalence is generally 6,5%, beyond 85 years of age it exceeds 50% and reaches 65% in the over-ninety population. The prevalence of frailty in the surgical population varies, depending on the studies, from 10 to 40%. Frailty and its severity grade represent themselves noticeably as strong predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes. The strongest evidence of association is recorded between frailty and mortality at 30 days.

The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of patients undergoing anesthesia for cardiothoracic and vascular surgery, with a specific focus on frailty elements and associated comorbidities that necessitate surgery.

This data analysis will provide valuable insights into the interaction between frailty, multimorbidity, and the perioperative pathway of patients undergoing cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Western population is going through a rapid process of aging, which is of major relevance for perioperative medicine because it is associated with an increase of approximately 2,5 times in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Despite the clear association between advanced age and adverse outcomes, there is a significant variability of outcomes in older patients which is not explainable solely based on the differences in age and comorbidities. In this regard, frailty seems to play a key role to explain such variability. Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome characterized by a decline in physiological homeostatic reserve, which translates into an increased susceptibility to adverse events and unfavorable outcomes following even small exposures to physical, physiological or psychosocial stress. However, frailty has not to be considered exclusively in a geriatric context. Several studies conducted in intensive care and perioperative settings have observed a not negligible prevalence of frailty also in age groups below 65 years.

In the European population up to 69 years, the prevalence is generally 6,5%, beyond 85 years of age it exceeds 50% and reaches 65% in the over-ninety population. The prevalence of frailty in the surgical population varies, depending on the studies, from 10 to 40%. Such variability is determined by several factors: the tools and thresholds used to define frailty, the type of surgery, the type of procedure within the same surgical specialty and the setting of surgery. In cardiac surgery, prevalences oscillating between 10 and 50% have been reported. In vascular surgery, the prevalence of frailty is on average high oscillating between 20 and 60%, while in the field of thoracic surgery data of prevalence stands around 12 and 50%.

Frailty and its severity grade represent themselves noticeably as strong predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes. The strongest evidence of association is recorded between frailty and mortality at 30 days (Odds Ration variable between 1.4 and 8.33).

In the physio-pathological processes that link frailty to adverse postoperative outcomes, there are certainly modifiable factors. Several data in the literature demonstrate this correlation, including the evidence that patients diagnosed with frailty, if subjected to major elective surgery in centers with low volumes of fragile patients, have lower rates of survival at 30 days and a higher incidence of mortality correlated to postoperative complications, other conditions being equal.

From what has been outlined, it is easy to understand how a better knowledge of frailty and its prevalence can be useful for health systems that have to be more and more structured with the availability of clinical and organizational resources appropriate for the increasing complexity and frailty of patients.

The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of patients undergoing anesthesia for cardiothoracic and vascular surgery, with a specific focus on frailty elements and associated comorbidities that necessitate surgery.

This data analysis will provide valuable insights into the interaction between frailty, multimorbidity, and the perioperative pathway of patients. Additionally, it will facilitate the development of a comprehensive description of clinical and organizational resources and their utilization in managing this specific category of patients.

This study will lay the foundations for further, more specific studies in this field and will provide useful information to build more suitable anesthesiologic clinical care pathways for the increasing demands of fragile and complex patients.

STUDY DESIGN

The study will be prospective, multicentric observational at the national level.

Data collection will not modify anesthetic treatments for patients included in the study or their treatment pathways. Therefore, according to current legislation, a conclusion of ad hoc insurance policies is not necessary.

Anthropometric, functional and procedural data will be collected during the pre-, intra- and post-operative period.

The period of observation for each enrolled subject starts with the first pre-operative anesthesiology assessment and ends 30 days after surgical intervention. Data relative to preoperative condition, surgical preparation and intra- and post-operative information of the subject will be collected.

Data collection will be constituted by a common part including all patients (CAfCA core) and specific parts related to the fields of cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery aimed to specifically characterize these subgroups of patients.

SAMPLE SIZE

This research is a prospective pilot study aiming at studying patients subjected to cardiac-thoracic-vascular surgery. In this field, very heterogeneous data has been reported in terms of frailty prevalence, as mentioned in the introduction, which varies between 20% and 60% according to which study is considered.

Considering a conservative estimation of the frailty prevalence of 50%, a margin of error and a population of 380 patients is sufficient to estimate the prevalence of frailty in the cardiac-thoracic-vascular population with a 95% confidence interval. This number is increased by 5% for a total of 400 patients to take account of missing data and drop-out. To reliably estimate the prevalence of frailty not only in the general cardiac-thoracic-vascular population, but also - as the secondary outcome - in each of the 3 subpopulations, meaning the prevalence of frailty in cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery, a sample of 500 patients will allow answering both to the primary outcome of frailty prevalence in the general population and to the secondary outcome of prevalence in the 3 subpopulations. For this purpose, it is supposed that every subgroup will contribute with 1/3 of the total enrolled patients (i.e. 166 patients) and, keeping a conservative estimate of the prevalence of 50%, in this case, the sample is sufficient to estimate frailty prevalence with a 7.5% margin of error in each of the 3 subpopulations, with a confidence interval of 95%.

Considering the observational nature of the study, the protocol allows for the possibility of recruiting a larger number of patients if the participating centers are willing to do so. By increasing the sample size, the study can achieve a higher level of precision in estimating the prevalence of frailty within the investigated subpopulations.

CLINICAL MANAGEMENT

During the preoperative anesthesiologic assessment, every eligible patient will be provided with a detailed explanation of the study protocol. They will be given the opportunity to review the study information and, if willing to participate, a signed informed consent will be obtained. Enrollment can take place during the pre-operative assessment or after the patient's admission to the hospital.

It is important to note that participating patients have the right to withdraw from the study at any time.

During enrolment, patients will be subjected to tests evaluating pharmacologic therapy adherence (Morinsky scale - MMAS-8), frailty evaluation test (Clinical Frailty Scale - CFS, Tilburg Frailty Indicator - TFI, Modified Frailty Index both the 5 and 11 items versions - mFI-5 and mFI-11) and engagement evaluation tests (Patient Health Engagement - PHE score).

Furthermore, for each patient, the ASA score, Charlson comorbidity score, MUST score, ACS NSQIP, physiologic P-POSSUM, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), AKI risk index and ARISCAT score will be registered.

Other evaluation scores will be employed specifically for the different patient types:

  • Cardiac surgery patients: EUROSCORE II and FORECST (evaluation of frailty in cardiac surgery)
  • Thoracic surgery patients: ThRCRI, Thoracoscore, Eurolung 1 and 2, ECOG performance status scale
  • Vascular surgery patients: V-Possum

The data retrieved through the aforementioned scores will not be utilized to modify the patients' perioperative pathway unless they are already part of specific protocols implemented by the participating center. The surgical and anesthesiologic procedures will be conducted according to the local management protocols, and participation in the study will not result in any modifications to these procedures.

The experimenters at each center will be limited to reporting the patients' preoperative clinical conditions, laboratory and instrumental exams, information regarding the performed surgery, and any complications that occur during the hospital stay.

The experimenter will conduct re-evaluations of each patient from the first to the fifth postoperative day, as well as at the time of hospital discharge, in order to record any potential medical or surgical complications that may arise. Additionally, a follow-up will be conducted 30 days after discharge via phone to assess the patient's health status and record any incidences of complications, re-hospitalization, or mortality.

Complications will be recorded in a specific manner, utilizing the Clavien-Dindo classification system. This classification system provides standardized criteria for defining and grading complications. The definitions of complications will be based on established guidelines and international consensus documents published in the literature, ensuring consistency and accuracy in the recording and reporting of complications throughout the study.

DATA GATHERING AND ANALYSIS PLAN

Data will be retrieved in pseudo-anonym form. Data gathering will be made through a specifically created database, on RedCap platform, which has been made available by the Italian Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Società Italiana di Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva - SIAARTI).

Analysis Plan No interim analyses are expected. Most of the statistical analysis will be descriptive. Categorical variables considered will be described in terms of frequency and percentages, and continuous variables in terms of mean (sd) and median (IQR) as appropriate. The primary objective will be described in terms of prevalence with 95% of the expected confidence interval.

Univariate comparative analyses will be conducted through Chi-Square test and Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate, considering a significance level of 0.05 in the general population and stratifying the 3 populations. Missing data will be analyzed and handled if necessary, with multiple-imputation or analog techniques.

The correlation between frailty scores will be investigated through Bland-Altman analysis and correlation coefficient.

A multivariate correlation analysis will be conducted to explore associations between preoperative factors, pre-operative risk scores, frailty and outcomes.

The possibility to perform further analyses non specified in the protocol but suggested by the above-mentioned planned analyses is admitted (particularly in the cardiac-thoracic-vascular filed of the three subgroups of patients).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Brescia, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Spedali Civili di Brescia
        • Contact:
          • Sergio Cattaneo
      • Legnano, Italy
        • Completed
        • Asst Ovest Milanese
      • Pavia, Italy
        • Completed
        • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo
      • Potenza, Italy
        • Completed
        • AOR San Carlo
      • Siena, Italy
        • Completed
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Senese
      • Turin, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
        • Contact:
          • Andrea Costamagna
      • Turin, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Umberto I Mauriziano
        • Contact:
          • Lorenzo Bartoletti
    • Lombardia
      • Rozzano, Lombardia, Italy, 20089
        • Completed
        • Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients subjected to anesthesia for elective cardiac-thoracic-vascular surgery consecutively recruited during a period of 1 month designated by each partecipating center

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for elective cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgery
  • Patients aged 18 or older
  • Patients who have provided informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients subjected to surgery in urgency and emergency settings
  • Procedures in one-day surgery settings
  • Procedures without the involvement of anesthesiologists

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Thoracic surgery
Patient undergoing thoracic surgery
Observational study in patients undergoing thoracic, cardiac and vascular surgery.
Cardiac surgery
Patient undergoing cardiac surgery
Observational study in patients undergoing thoracic, cardiac and vascular surgery.
Vascular surgery
Patient undergoing vascular surgery
Observational study in patients undergoing thoracic, cardiac and vascular surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frailty Prevalence
Time Frame: at preoperative evaluation visit
Determine the prevalence of frailty in the sample using the Clinical Frailty Score, in the three clinical areas: cardiac, thoracic, and vascular surgery
at preoperative evaluation visit
Frailty Prevalence comparison
Time Frame: at preoperative evaluation visit
Frailty prevalence comparison among the three clinical areas: cardiac, thoracic, and vascular surgery
at preoperative evaluation visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multimorbidity description
Time Frame: at preoperative evaluation visit
Describe the multimorbidity profile of the included patients.
at preoperative evaluation visit
In-hospital complications
Time Frame: up to 30 days after operation
Incidence of in-hospital complications
up to 30 days after operation
Unplanned ICU admission
Time Frame: up to 30 days after operation
Unplanned ICU admissions rate
up to 30 days after operation
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 30 days after operation
Length of hospital stay (days)
up to 30 days after operation
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: up to 30 days after operation
In-hospital mortality rate
up to 30 days after operation
30-day mortality
Time Frame: up to 30 days after operation
Mortality rate at 30 days after intervention
up to 30 days after operation
Association between different frailty risk scores and clinical outcomes
Time Frame: up to 30 days after operation
Association between different frailty risk scores and clinical outcomes (complications, length of stay, mortality)
up to 30 days after operation
Correlation between perioperative risk scores and frailty scores
Time Frame: at preoperative evaluation visit
Correlation between perioperative risk scores and frailty scores
at preoperative evaluation visit
Description of the perioperative clinical pathway
Time Frame: up to 30 days after operation
Describe the perioperative clinical care pathway followed by the enrolled subjects
up to 30 days after operation
Description of the anesthesiologic techniques adopted
Time Frame: up to 30 days after operation
Provide details on the anesthesiologic techniques utilized and the level of invasiveness of hemodynamic monitoring employed.
up to 30 days after operation
Frailty assessment instruments comparison
Time Frame: at preoperative evaluation visit
Agreement between different frailty instruments
at preoperative evaluation visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Federico Piccioni, Dr, Irccs Humanitas Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CAfCA-3366

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Clinical Trials on Data collection

Subscribe