New MRI Techniques for Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (MARVY)

July 10, 2025 updated by: Associate Prof. Dr. Kak Khee Yeung, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Gamechanger: Development of MRI Based Endovascular Procedures for Vascular Surgery

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a pathological dilatation of the aorta in the belly which can rupture leading to bleeding within the belly. To prevent rupture elective surgery can be performed. Endovascular repair (EVAR) is a surgical intervention whereby a stent is inserted into the AAA to prevent it from further growth and rupture.

Standard AAA management has several drawbacks. To start: maximum AAA diameter is used to determine upon timing of elective repair but is imprecise in predicting the risk of rupture resulting in an unmet clinical need. Secondly, EVAR outcome and complication occurrence remain unpredictable due to poor prediction ability of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) utilised in the follow-up protocol. Lastly, patients and physicians are being repeatedly exposed to cumulative radiation toxicity. All these drawbacks could be solved by trading the standard imaging modalities by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Within the MARVY, advanced MRI techniques are used to find out if standard imaging techniques could be replaced by MRI in three phases of the AAA management (surveillance, surgery planning and post-operative follow-up). The two most important MRI techniques that will be used are 4D flow MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI which give respectively information about the blood flow within the AAA and perfusion of the aortic wall.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with an AAA from the Amsterdam UMC

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed with AAA
  • provision of written informed consent

Inclusion Criteria for surveillance part:

  • maximum AAA diameter between 3-5 cm
  • not scheduled for aneurysm repair at the time of inclusion

Inclusion Criteria for planning part:

  • planned for elective EVAR

Inclusion Criteria for follow-up part:

  • ten complication free years after EVAR or sac regression after EVAR; or
  • type I endoleak after EVAR; or
  • type II endoleak after EVAR;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Supra- or pararenal AAA
  • Inflammatory, infectious or mycotic AAA
  • Vasculitis and connective tissue disease
  • Patients that underwent open surgical repair for their AAA
  • Patients with ruptured AAAs
  • Patients that previously presented with allergic reactions to intravenous contrast agents

Exclusion Criteria for surveillance part:

  • previous AAA repair
  • severely reduced renal function
  • previous allergic reactions to intravenous contrast agents

Exclusion Criteria for planning part:

  • previous AAA repair

Exclusion Criteria for follow-up part:

  • severely reduced renal function
  • previous allergic reactions to intravenous contrast agents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Surveillance
20 AAA patients will undergo two MRI scans with a half year interval to assess a possible correlation between MRI derived biomarkers and the clinical standard to assess aneurysm progression (maximum AAA diameter).
Philips Ingenia 3.0T MR system with in-house developed PROUD software
Other Names:
  • DCE-MRI
  • 4D flow MRI
EVAR planning
10 patients will undergo magnetic resonance angiography next to the standard of CT angiography (CTA). It is investigated whether EVAR planning is feasible based on MRA and if or how measurements between MRA and CTA differ.
Philips Ingenia 3.0T MR system with in-house developed PROUD software
Other Names:
  • DCE-MRI
  • 4D flow MRI
EVAR follow-up
30 AAA patients who underwent EVAR will be included in three groups: 10 patients with ten complication free years after EVAR or sac regression, 10 patients with endoleak type I and 10 patients with endoleak type II. It is investigated whether MRI can provide extra information for the detection of endoleaks after EVAR.
Philips Ingenia 3.0T MR system with in-house developed PROUD software
Other Names:
  • DCE-MRI
  • 4D flow MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surveillance: correlation between growth rate and MRI derived parameters
Time Frame: 1 year
The main study parameter for phase B1 (surveillance) is the correlation between growth rate of the AAA (determinant for the standard of care) and measured MRI parameters acquired with 4D flow MRI and DCE-MRI.
1 year
EVAR planning: correlation between morphological parameters measured based on MRA and CTA
Time Frame: half year
The main study parameter for phase B2 (EVAR planning) is the difference between anatomical measurements (lengths and diameters) based on both CTA and MRA. Several quantitative anatomical measurements will be utilised to assess the feasibility of MRA for planning of EVARs.
half year
EVAR follow up: difference in MRI parameters between patients with endoleaks and without
Time Frame: 1 year
The main study parameter for phase B3 (EVAR follow-up) is the difference in MRI parameters measured post-operatively in patients with and without EVAR related complications.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 13, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Without Rupture

Clinical Trials on Magnetic resonance imaging (with PROUD software)

Subscribe