Transforming Hemodialysis-Related Vascular Access Education (THRiVE)

March 23, 2026 updated by: Laura Dember, MD, University of Pennsylvania

Transforming Hemodialysis-Related Vascular Access Education (THRiVE)

The focus of this study is on vascular access for hemodialysis. This is a randomized clinical trial testing 3 educational approaches to help patients with advanced chronic kidney disease prepare for placement of hemodialysis vascular access. Study participants will each be assigned to one of the 3 approaches: 1) "Education", in which participants will be given a video and brochure that provide information about the types of vascular access and what can be expected before and after the vascular access is placed, 2) "Education-Plus", in which participants will be given the video and brochure and will also have sessions by telehealth with a motivational interviewing coach to provide additional support around vascular access placement, and 3) "Usual Care", in which participants will have the usual education provided by their kidney doctor and clinic staff just as if they were not in the study. Participants in all 3 groups will be asked to complete questionnaires by telephone and may be invited to be interviewed about their experience with the study intervention at the end of the study. Study participation will last for about 12 months, with most of the study activities taking place during the first 3 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

360

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Deidra Crews, MD, ScM
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Recruiting
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
        • Contact:
          • Jennifer E. Flythe, MD, MPH
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jennifer E. Flythe, MD, MPH
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19106

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or older
  2. Nephrology visit for chronic kidney disease during the last 18 months
  3. Most recent eGFR less than or equal to 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 or 2-year Kidney Failure Risk Equation score greater than 40%
  4. Documentation in the medical record or confirmation from the treating nephrologist of a patient-nephrologist discussion about hemodialysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Planning for peritoneal dialysis, preemptive transplant, or conservative management of kidney failure
  2. Previous placement of an AV access
  3. Prior appointment with surgeon for AV access evaluation or creation
  4. Cognitive dysfunction or severe visual impairment that prevents use of the education materials
  5. Does not speak either English or Spanish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Usual Care
Participants receive the non-standardized vascular access counseling and referral to the chronic kidney disease education class that comprises the standard care provided by their nephrology clinic.
Nephrologists and clinic staff receive monthly, provider-specific, lists of patients potentially appropriate for AV access planning based on eGFR thresholds and kidney failure risk. These criteria identify patients at risk for progression to dialysis and are congruent with evidence-based guidelines for optimal timing of AV access evaluation referral.
Experimental: Education
Participants are provided with the "Getting Ready: Your Vascular Access Journey" video and brochure about hemodialysis vascular access. The video is available for viewing via smartphone or computer. Both the brochure and video were created with input from patients with chronic kidney disease.
Participants receive the non-standardized vascular access counseling and referral to the chronic kidney disease education class that comprises the standard care provided by their nephrology clinic.
Nephrologists and clinic staff receive monthly, provider-specific, lists of patients potentially appropriate for AV access planning based on eGFR thresholds and kidney failure risk. These criteria identify patients at risk for progression to dialysis and are congruent with evidence-based guidelines for optimal timing of AV access evaluation referral.
Experimental: Education-Plus
Participants are provided with the "Getting Ready: Your Vascular Access Journey" video and brochure about hemodialysis vascular access. The video is available for viewing via smartphone or computer. Both the brochure and video were created with input from patients with chronic kidney disease.
Participants receive the non-standardized vascular access counseling and referral to the chronic kidney disease education class that comprises the standard care provided by their nephrology clinic.
Nephrologists and clinic staff receive monthly, provider-specific, lists of patients potentially appropriate for AV access planning based on eGFR thresholds and kidney failure risk. These criteria identify patients at risk for progression to dialysis and are congruent with evidence-based guidelines for optimal timing of AV access evaluation referral.
Participants receive coaching with telehealth-based motivational interviewing designed to prepare participants to move forward with vascular access creation. Motivational interviewing will consist of a minimum of 3 and maximum of 8 telehealth sessions with a coach. The coach will use patient-centered communication skills to work though the stages of pre-contemplative, contemplative, preparation, action, and maintenance of an arteriovenous vascular access.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgery for Creation of Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Access (Effectiveness outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 months after randomization or before hemodialysis initiation, whichever comes first
The proportion of participants who have arteriovenous access creation surgery.
Within 12 months after randomization or before hemodialysis initiation, whichever comes first

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scheduled Appointment with Surgeon for Vascular Access Evaluation (Effectiveness outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 months after randomization or before hemodialysis initiation, whichever comes first
The proportion of participants with a scheduled appointment with a surgeon for evaluation for vascular access creation.
Within 12 months after randomization or before hemodialysis initiation, whichever comes first
Completed Appointment with Surgeon for Vascular Access Evaluation (Effectiveness outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 months after randomization or before hemodialysis initiation, whichever comes first
The proportion of participants with a completed appointment with a surgeon for evaluation for vascular access creation.
Within 12 months after randomization or before hemodialysis initiation, whichever comes first
Imaging for Planning Arteriovenous Vascular Access Creation (Effectiveness outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 months after randomization or before hemodialysis initiation, whichever comes first
The proportion of participants with completed vascular imaging via ultrasound or angiography for planning arteriovenous vascular access creation surgery.
Within 12 months after randomization or before hemodialysis initiation, whichever comes first
Usable Arteriovenous Vascular Access (Effectiveness outcome)
Time Frame: Up to 4 years after randomization (full duration of the trial)
For participants who start hemodialysis, the proportion with a usable arteriovenous access at dialysis initiation.
Up to 4 years after randomization (full duration of the trial)
Vascular Access Knowledge (Effectiveness outcome)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
The change from baseline in vascular access knowledge as measured by the Patient Perceived Vascular Access Knowledge scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a higher level of vascular access knowledge.
12 weeks after randomization
Decision Self-Efficacy (Effectiveness outcome)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
The change from baseline in decision self-efficacy as measured by the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 11, with higher scores indicating a higher level of self-efficacy when making decisions about hemodialysis vascular access.
12 weeks after randomization
Preparedness for Decision-Making (Effectiveness outcome)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
A participant's level of preparedness for decision-making as measured by the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale. The total score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a higher perceived level of preparation for decision-making.
12 weeks after randomization
Characteristics of Eligible Patients - quantitative reach assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Pre-Enrollment
An assessment of the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of patients who are eligible for the trial.
Pre-Enrollment
Characteristics of Enrolled Participants - quantitative reach assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Baseline
An assessment of the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of patients who enroll in the trial.
Baseline
Characteristics of Participants who Complete the Trial - quantitative reach assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: 12 months
An assessment of the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of participants who complete the trial.
12 months
Characteristics of Participants who Withdraw from the Trial - quantitative reach assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: From eligibility until 12 months
An assessment of the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of participants who withdraw from the trial.
From eligibility until 12 months
Declined Enrollment - quantitative reach assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Pre-enrollment
The reasons for declining enrollment as documented in screening logs and provided in aggregate for an enrolling center.
Pre-enrollment
Reasons for Participation - qualitative reach assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: 12-16 weeks after randomization
The reasons for participation and non-participation as identified through qualitative interviews
12-16 weeks after randomization
Reasons Nephrologists Opt-Out on Behalf of Patients - qualitative reach assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Up to 4 years after trial initiation (full duration of the trial)
The reasons that nephrologists opt out of having an eligible patient approached by the research team for possible enrollment as identified through qualitative interviews.
Up to 4 years after trial initiation (full duration of the trial)
Acceptability Intervention Measure - quantitative acceptability assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: 12 -16 weeks after randomization
The acceptability of the intervention as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). The total score ranges from 1-5, with higher scores indicating a higher level of acceptability of the intervention.
12 -16 weeks after randomization
Acceptability of Intervention Content, Delivery, and Accessibility - qualitative acceptability assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: 12 to 16 weeks after randomization
The acceptability of the content, delivery, and accessibility of educational materials and motivational interviewing coaching as identified through qualitative interviews.
12 to 16 weeks after randomization
Chronic Kidney Disease Class Attendance - quantitative fidelity assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 months
The proportion of participants who attend a Chronic Kidney Disease education class provided by their nephrology clinic
Within 12 months
Receipt of Educational Materials - quantitative fidelity assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 weeks after randomization
The proportion of participants with confirmed receipt of the "Getting Ready" brochure (only be assessed for the Education and Education-Plus groups)
Within 12 weeks after randomization
Viewing of Video - quantitative fidelity assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 weeks after randomization
The proportion of participants with confirmed viewing of the "Getting Ready" video, which will only be assessed for the Education and Education-Plus groups.
Within 12 weeks after randomization
Completed Motivational Interviewing Sessions - quantitative fidelity assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 months after randomization
The proportion of participants who completed the scheduled motivational interviewing sessions (only be assessed for the Education-Plus group)
Within 12 months after randomization
Brochure Delivery Mode - quantitative barriers/facilitators assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 weeks after randomization
The selected mode for delivery of the "Getting Ready" brochure by center, clinic, and participant sociodemographic characteristics.
Within 12 weeks after randomization
Video Delivery Mode - quantitative barriers/facilitators assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 weeks after randomization
The selected mode for viewing of the "Getting Ready" video by center, clinic, and participant sociodemographic characteristics.
Within 12 weeks after randomization
Participant Contact Attempts for Motivational Interviewing - quantitative barriers/facilitators assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: 12 month period after randomization
The number and type (email, phone, text messaging) of attempted and confirmed participant contacts by the motivational interviewing coach.
12 month period after randomization
Missed Motivational Interviewing Sessions - quantitative barriers/facilitators assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: 12 month period after randomization
The number of missed motivational interviewing sessions.
12 month period after randomization
System-Level Barriers to Arteriovenous Access Creation From Clinical Staff Perspective - qualitative implementation/barriers assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Up to 4 years after trial initiation (full duration of the trial)
System-level barriers to arteriovenous vascular access creation and relevant system contextual factors as identified through qualitative interviews.
Up to 4 years after trial initiation (full duration of the trial)
System-Level Barriers to Arteriovenous Access Creation From Participant Perspective - qualitative implementation/barriers assessment (Implementation outcome)
Time Frame: Within 12 months
System-level barriers to arteriovenous vascular access creation and relevant system contextual factors as identified through qualitative interviews.
Within 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Creation of Arteriovenous Vascular Access Without Subsequent Need for Hemodialysis
Time Frame: Up to 4 years after randomization (full duration of the trial)
The creation of an arteriovenous vascular access without a subsequent need for hemodialysis is a potential unintended consequence of interventions.
Up to 4 years after randomization (full duration of the trial)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deidra Crews, MD, ScM, Johns Hopkins University
  • Principal Investigator: Laura M. Dember, MD, University of Pennsylvania
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer E. Flythe, MD, MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease

Clinical Trials on Educational Materials

Subscribe