High Energy Density Pulse Electromagnetic Field for Patients With Adhensive Capsulitis

December 31, 2024 updated by: Liang-Cheng Chen, Tri-Service General Hospital

Efficacy of High Energy Density Pulse Electromagnetic Field for Patients With Adhensive Capsulitis

The aim of our study is to investigate the efficacy of high energy density pulse electromagnetic field for patients with adhesive capsulitis

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adhesive capsulitis, a condition causing shoulder pain and limited range of motion (ROM), is estimated to affect 2-5% of the general population. Typically occurring in middle-aged individuals during their 50s to 70s, it presents with gradually developing shoulder pain and restricted ROM, particularly in external rotation.

In cases of primary adhesive capsulitis, the condition often resolves on its own, lasting around 18-24 months. However, some individuals experience persistent symptoms beyond 3 years, with up to 40% of patients and 15% facing lasting disability. Therefore, effective treatment is essential to alleviate the pain and disability associated with frozen shoulder.

High energy density pulse electromagnetic field (High-PEMF) differs from traditional PEMF and possesses the following characteristics:

Brief pulse duration (50μs) with a damped oscillation. Wide bandwidth (200kHz~300MHz) centered around 240kHz. High voltages (up to 40 kV) and peak currents (up to 10 kA) in the applicator spool.

Delivery of around 96Ws (Joule) of energy per pulse with a magnetic flux density of 50~100mT.

Tissue and organ penetration up to 20 cm. Although High-PEMF has shown positive results in chronic tendinopathy, there is limited evidence of its effectiveness in treating adhesive capsulitis. Therefore, our study aims to explore the efficacy and potential mechanisms underlying the use of High-PEMF in treating adhesive capsulitis patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Tri-Service General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Physicians diagnose frozen shoulder by considering the patient's medical background, conducting a physical assessment, and reviewing X-ray and ultrasound findings.
  2. The symptoms endure for a duration exceeding 3 months.
  3. There exists a decrease of no less than 30 degrees in a minimum of two joint angles of the affected shoulder, namely flexion, abduction, and external rotation, in comparison to the corresponding angles of the unaffected side.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Musculoskeletal ultrasound of the shoulder identifies a full-thickness tear or substantial tear in the rotator cuff tendons or presents calcific tendinitis.
  2. Presence of systemic rheumatic disease.
  3. Prior history of shoulder fracture or surgical intervention involving the shoulder joint.
  4. Acute compression of cervical nerve root.
  5. Patients displaying instability (e.g., those with signs of internal bleeding) or individuals with cancer.
  6. Recent receipt of shoulder injections for treatment within the last 3 months.
  7. Impaired cognitive function that hinders the patient's ability to provide informed consent or engage in rehabilitation therapy.
  8. Expectant or breastfeeding women.
  9. Meets any of the contraindications for high-energy electromagnetic pulse therapy: individuals with organ transplants, implanted cardiac pacemakers, defibrillators, metal implants (such as stents), cochlear implants, and those requiring insulin supplementation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: physiotherapy and high-PEMF
The patient receives physiotherapy and high-PEMF therapy twice weekly, over a period of three weeks.
The treatment coil is positioned over the area of the shoulder that experiences the most pain, and it remains in place for a duration of 9 minutes. The patient is subjected to a high-energy high-PEMF with a frequency of 3 pulses per second during the session.
Physiotherapy includes a range of activities such as passive and active-assisted shoulder range of motion (ROM) exercises, Pendulum exercises, Codman's exercises, and Cross-body reach exercises. These exercises are conducted under the supervision of a physiotherapist and each training session lasts approximately 30 minutes.
Sham Comparator: physiotherapy and sham high-PEMF
The patient receives physiotherapy and sham high-PEMF therapy twice weekly, over a period of three weeks.
Physiotherapy includes a range of activities such as passive and active-assisted shoulder range of motion (ROM) exercises, Pendulum exercises, Codman's exercises, and Cross-body reach exercises. These exercises are conducted under the supervision of a physiotherapist and each training session lasts approximately 30 minutes.
The sham treatment coil is positioned over the area of the shoulder where maximum pain is experienced, and it remains in place for a duration of 9 minutes. The parameters are consistent with those used in the experimental group. The key distinction lies in the fact that the energy output is not delivered to the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
Time Frame: the change from baseline, post-intervention immediately, post-intervention 1, 3, 6 months
The visual analogue scale (VAS) is a scale used to determine the pain intensity experienced by individuals. "0" means painless and "10" means extremely painful.
the change from baseline, post-intervention immediately, post-intervention 1, 3, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Time Frame: the change from baseline, post-intervention immediately, post-intervention 1, 3, 6 months
Shoulder functionality and impairment were assessed employing the Chinese version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). This self-reported questionnaire comprises distinct pain and disability sections, yielding both domain-specific and overall scores. The SPADI encompasses five pain-related inquiries and eight disability-related questions, all pertaining to various shoulder issues encountered within the preceding week. Each item's score ranges between 0 (indicating no pain/normalcy) and 10 (reflecting maximal pain/impairment). The cumulative pain score ranges from 0 to 50, while the disability score ranges from 0 to 80. A higher score indicates a greater level of disability.
the change from baseline, post-intervention immediately, post-intervention 1, 3, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Liang cheng Chen, MD, MS, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C202305036

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adhesive Capsulitis

Clinical Trials on High energy density pulse electromagnetic field

Subscribe