Oral, Chemosensory and Trigeminal Functions in Allo-HSCT

April 27, 2026 updated by: Per Ole Iversen, MD, University of Oslo

Oral, Chemosensory and Trigeminal Functions in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - a Prospective Cohort-study

The goal of this prospective, cohort study is to learn about smell, taste and trigeminal dysfunction in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The research team hypothesizes that treatment with allo-HSCT will induce:

  • Distortion of taste and smell and trigeminal functions like cooling, tingling, and burning sensations.
  • Reduced saliva production leading to oral dryness and dental caries.
  • Changes in the connectivity of the taste-, smell- and pain-cortical brain regions.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Participants will undergo various tests:

  • Smell function assessment with Sniffin' Sticks.
  • Taste function assessment with Taste Strips.
  • Oral trigeminal function assessment with von Frey filaments .
  • Salivary assessment with the Summated Xerostomia Inventory-Dutch questionnaire.
  • Salivary flow will be measured using salivary flow rate - stimulated whole saliva (SWS).
  • A clinical oral examination will be done to obtain a Clinical Oral Dryness Score.
  • Qualitative smell, taste and trigeminal dysfunction will be assessed using a questionnaire.
  • Radiological and clinical examinations will be performed to evaluate dental and oral mucosal status.
  • Quality of life using questionnaire.
  • Nutritional status using questionnaire.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain will be taken to capture regions-of-interest for the three different networks of interest; (i) the gustatory network reflecting changes in taste perception, (ii) the olfactory network, related to the changes in smell, and (iii) the pain matrix reflecting pain.

There will be a comparisons between the patients and healthy controls.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients receiving myeloablative conditioning for a first-time allo-HSCT and diagnosed with either a leukemia or a myelodysplastic syndrome.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• patients receiving myeloablative conditioning for a first-time allo-HSCT and diagnosed with either a leukemia or a myelodysplastic syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • disorders affecting the oral cavity including poor tooth-status
  • those using drugs affecting the gustatory/olfactory functions
  • those with brain disorders
  • those who have a chronic disorder affecting the immune system, have cancer or who are pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients
Adult recipients of allo-HCST.
Controls
Healthy adult subjects

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Olfactory (smell) function
Time Frame: 1 year
Odour pens of the Sniffin' Sticks (Burghart Messtechnik, Wedel, Germany) will be used to test olfactory function (TDI). Scores will range from 0 - 48 where score ≤ 16.5 = anosmia (no sense of smell), score 16.6 - 30.5 = hyposmia (reduced sense of smell) and score >30.5 = normosmia (normal sense of smell)
1 year
Self-reported olfactory (smell) function
Time Frame: 1 year
Self-reported smell function will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 where 0 indicates no smell function and 10 very good smell function.
1 year
Gustatory (taste) function
Time Frame: 1 year
Taste function will be evaluated by using taste strips ("Taste Strips "Burghart Messtechnik, Wedel, Germany) with four basic taste qualities (sweet, sour, salty and bitter) in 4 different concentrations each. Scores will range from 0 - 16 where 0 = ageusia (no sense of taste), 1 - 9 = hypogeusia (reduced sense of smell) and 10 - 16 = normogeusia (normal sense of taste)
1 year
Self-reported gustatory (taste) function
Time Frame: 1 year
Self-reported taste function will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 where 0 indicates no taste function and 10 very good taste function.
1 year
Oral pain assessment
Time Frame: 1 year
Oral pain perception will be assessed by von Frey filaments. Scores will range from 0 -10 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 indicates no pain and 10 severe pain.
1 year
Self-reported oral pain assessment
Time Frame: 1 year
Self-reported oral pain will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 where 0 indicates no oral pain and 10 severe oral pain.
1 year
Functional brain connectivity
Time Frame: 1 year
Functional connectivity analysis (fMRI) of three different networks of interest: (i) the olfactory network (ii) the gustatory, and (iii) the pain matrix. There are no specified quantitative units for these measurements.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measured oral dryness
Time Frame: 1 year
Saliva production will be measured using salivary flow rate - stimulated whole saliva (SWS). Hyposalivation is defined as a salivary secretion rate of ≤0.7 mL/min for SWS.
1 year
Clinical oral dryness
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical oral dryness will be assessed using Clinical Oral Dryness Score (CODS). Scores will range from 0 to 10 points. Score 1-3 is considered mild oral dryness, 4-6 moderate and 7-10 severe oral dryness.
1 year
Self-reported oral dryness
Time Frame: 1 year
Self-reported oral dryness will be assessed using the Xerostomia Inventory (XI) questionnaire. Scores will range from 11 to 55 points, with values <14 considered as normal.
1 year
Oral mucosal status
Time Frame: 1 year
Oral mucosal status will be evaluated using mucosal-plaque index (MPS). Scores will range from 2 - 8 where 2 - 4 = good/acceptable, 5 - 6 = no acceptable and 7 - 8 = poor status
1 year
Oral mucositis status
Time Frame: 1 year
Oral mucosal status will be evaluated using the WHO mucositis grading ranging form 0 - 4 where 0 = no oral mucositis, 1 = erythema and soreness, 2 = ulcers, able to eat solids, 3 = ulcers, requires a liquid diet (due to mucositis), 4 = ulcers, alimentation not possible (due to mucositis)
1 year
Nutritional status
Time Frame: 1 year
Nutritional status will be evaluated using the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 form. Scores range from 0-6. Patients with a score < 3 is considered to be of no nutritional risk. Patients with a score ≥ 3 is considered to be in nutritional risk.
1 year
Quality of life evaluation
Time Frame: 1 year
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Scores range from 0-100. A high score indicates better quality of life and a low score indicates a worse quality of life.
1 year
Oral health-related quality of life evaluation
Time Frame: 1 year
Oral health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire. Scores range from 0-56. A high score indicates worse oral health-related quality of life, while a low score indicates better.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Per Ole Iversen, phd, University of Oslo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 282886

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Subscribe