- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06005480
Understanding Rebound Pain After Regional Anesthesia Resolution in Healthy Volunteers
November 4, 2025 updated by: Yun-Yun K. Chen, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Understanding Rebound Pain After Regional Anesthesia Resolution: Mechanistic Trial in Healthy Volunteers
Regional anesthesia decreases postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption, and may prevent chronic pain after surgery in patients undergoing surgery.
However, some patients experience an increase of pain into the severe range when the nerve block wears off, also known as rebound pain.
The investigators are studying if a nerve block (numbing injection) in the arm causes hyperalgesia (increased pain) when the nerve block is wearing off.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized study in healthy volunteers who will undergo sensory testing using quantitative sensory testing (QST), complete psychosocial and pain questionnaires, and ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block of the arm (axillary nerve block) in a supervised, monitored setting (BWH Clinical Investigation Center).
The investigators plan to assess the association between different QST modalities at different time points pre- and post-nerve block resolution.
Semi-structured interviews and qualitative analysis will be used to explore patient's experiences with nerve block placement.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
40
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years old, ≤ 65 years old
- BMI >18, < 35
- Able to speak and understand English
- Willingness to undergo psychophysical testing (e.g., QST, pain questionnaires)
- Willingness to have nerve block performed
Exclusion Criteria:
- Ongoing acute or chronic pain in upper extremities
- Skin or tissue infection affecting upper extremities
- Previous hypersensitivity to mepivacaine or lidocaine
- Previous neuropathy (numbness, paresthesia, or motor weakness) in either upper extremity
- Loss of any limb
- Bleeding issues or bleeding disorder
- History of alcohol or drug abuse
- Currently pregnant or breastfeeding
- History of seizure or epilepsy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Block upper extremity (arm)
Upper extremity with a nerve block
|
Injection of 1.5% Mepivacaine in nerve block
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Control upper extremity (arm)
Upper extremity without a nerve block
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Heat pain detection threshold at time 1 hr
Time Frame: 1 hour after nerve block resolution
|
Heat pain detection threshold (°C) between block arm and control arm using a heat probe at 1 hour after nerve block resolution
|
1 hour after nerve block resolution
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Heat pain detection threshold and tolerance
Time Frame: 0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
Heat pain detection threshold and tolerance (°C) between block arm and control arm using a heat probe at different time points up to 3 hours nerve block resolution
|
0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
|
Pressure pain threshold and tolerance
Time Frame: 0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
Pressure pain threshold and tolerance (N of force) between block arm and control arm using an algometer at different time points up to 3 hours nerve block resolution
|
0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
|
Temporal summation and sharp pain
Time Frame: 0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
Temporal summation and sharp pain (evaluated by numerical rating scale 0-10 pain score) between block arm and control arm using a pinprick device at different time points up to 3 hours nerve block
|
0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
|
Light touch detection
Time Frame: 0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
Light touch detection (mN of force) between block arm and control arm using von Frey filaments at different time points up to 3 hours nerve block
|
0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
|
Light touch pain threshold
Time Frame: 0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
Light touch pain threshold (mN of force) between block arm and control arm using von Frey filaments at different time points up to 3 hours nerve block
|
0-3 hours after nerve block resolution
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Temperature change
Time Frame: 6-8 hours
|
To observe the change in temperature between block arm and control arm (°C) pre, during, and post nerve block
|
6-8 hours
|
|
Patient's experiences with nerve block
Time Frame: 6-8 hours
|
Semi-structured interviews will be used to explore patient's experiences with nerve block placement using an immersion/crystallization approach to identify emergent themes
|
6-8 hours
|
|
Pain catastrophizing and gender differences
Time Frame: 6-8 hours
|
Correlation between situational pain catastrophizing (0-24 scale) and gender
|
6-8 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yun-Yun K Chen, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 28, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 28, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
May 28, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 17, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
August 22, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 5, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 4, 2025
Last Verified
June 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023P001767
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.