- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06010238
STV Analysis Versus Visual Evaluation of Cardiotocography in FGR (SAVEFGR)
Short Term Variation Analysis Versus Visual Evaluation of Cardiotocography in Fetal Growth Restriction
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Severe, early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR, <32 weeks gestation) is a condition in which the fetus does not reach its growth potential due to placental insufficiency[. This condition affects about 0.3% of pregnancies, accounting for an estimated 15,000 babies in Europe being born premature below 32 weeks gestation. The main clinical dilemma of FGR lies in the timing of birth, given the balance of risks of antenatal mortality and severe damage to organs and the aggravated neonatal effects of prematurity: death or survival with severe neurodevelopmental impairment. The mainstay of clinical management in these cases pivots around the anticipation of the risk of fetal demise from placental oxygenation failure. The monitoring variables that are currently available comprise assessment of the severity of metabolic insufficiency (fetal size and growth, Doppler ultrasound, serum biomarkers) and the early detection of progressive fetal hypoxia with cardiotocography (CTG). The common approach is to deliver the fetus when signs of advanced hypoxia appear on CTG. A delicate balance exists between having the fetus born (too) early and facing the risks of extreme prematurity combined with a very low birthweight; and between delivering the fetus (too) late when the fetus has the disadvantage of hypoxia at birth. The decision when to deliver the fetus, is made mostly based on the CTG. The inter- and intra-observer variability could be overcome by software analysis according to the original Dawes&Redman algorithm. The software calculates the short-term variation (STV) of the inter-beat interval expressed in milliseconds, and a range of secondary calculations. In contrast with repeated decelerations, when fetal hypoxia is considered evident, the place of the software analysis of the fetal heart rate variability is less clear. Although the advantages of mathematized and uniform quantification of the fetal heart rate variability appear self-evident, there are no studies with sufficient power to detect an association of intervention based on STV at any threshold with the most important outcomes: fetal death and long-term infant outcome.
The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of monitoring the fetal condition with STV in computerized CTG compared to visual interpretation of the CTG in order to time delivery in pregnant women with severe, early-onset FGR.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Wessel Ganzevoort, MD PhD
- Phone Number: 003120-5669111
- Email: j.w.ganzevoort@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Anouk Pels, MD PhD
- Phone Number: 003120-5669111
- Email: a.pels@amsterdamumc.nl
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy between 24 weeks and 0 days and 31 weeks and 6 days with severe, early-onset fetal growth restriction, admitted in hospital or frequently evaluated ambulatory by CTG (according to local protocol) for fetal monitoring.
- Fetal growth restriction is defined in line with the international Delphi consensus as biometric ultrasound measurement of the abdominal circumference (AC) OR a combination of measurements resulting in an estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 3rd percentile (<p3) OR a combination of EFW <p10 AND uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) >p95 OR umbilical artery Doppler PI >p95.
- Maternal age ≥ 18 years.
- Able to provide written informed consent for collection and use of data on informed consent form in available language.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known congenital or chromosomal anomalies influencing perinatal outcome.
- Imminent labour or expected maternal indication for delivery < 48 hours.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Visual interpretation of cardiotocography
Monitoring by visual interpretation of cardiotocography
|
Visual interpretation of cardiotocography
|
|
Experimental: Short term variation
Short term variation by computer software analysis
|
Short term variation in computer software analysis
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of pregnancies resulting in perinatal death
Time Frame: Before discharge from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), up to 1 year
|
Perinatal death is defined as antenatal death or neonatal/infant death before discharge from NICU
|
Before discharge from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), up to 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of children with major neonatal morbidity
Time Frame: Before discharge from NICU, up to 1 year
|
Major neonatal morbidity is a composite outcome defined as intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or more, periventricular leukomalacia grade 2 or more, moderate or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis Bell stage 2 or more, or retinopathy of prematurity requiring therapy.
|
Before discharge from NICU, up to 1 year
|
|
Proportion of children with neonatal morbidities
Time Frame: Before discharge from NICU, up to 1 year
|
Individual neonatal morbidities of the abovementioned composite outcome and additionally persisting ductus arteriosus, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), period of invasive mechanical ventilation in days, medication need, hypoglycaemia, neonatal jaundice, sepsis and cardiovascular function.
|
Before discharge from NICU, up to 1 year
|
|
Proportion of children with neurodevelopmental impairment
Time Frame: At two years of corrected age
|
Neurodevelopmental impairment is defined as an abnormal test on Bayley III Dutch version (or version IV if available) (composite cognitive score < 85, composite motor score < 85), cerebral palsy, with a Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) grade > 1, hearing loss needing hearing aids, or severe visual loss (legally certifiable as blind or partially sighted) assessed at two years of corrected age
|
At two years of corrected age
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Wessel Ganzevoort, MD PhD, Amsterdam UMC
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 84591
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fetal Growth Retardation
-
Nantes University HospitalTerminatedIntra Uterine Growth RetardationFrance
-
amera mohamedUnknownThe Relationship Between Second Trimester Placental Growth Factor Level and Fetal Growth RestrictionIntra Uterine Growth RetardationEgypt
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityWithdrawnFetal Growth Retardation | Intrauterine Growth Restriction | Intrauterine Growth Retardation | Fetal Growth Restriction
-
Poitiers University HospitalCompletedIntrauterine Growth Retardation (IUGR)France
-
PfizerCompletedGrowth Disorders | Intrauterine Growth RetardationFrance
-
Van Bölge Eğitim ve Araştırma HastanesiCompletedIntrauterine RetardationTurkey
-
Ain Shams Maternity HospitalCompletedFasting | Fetal Growth Retardation, Antenatal (Disorder)
-
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyMerck Serono S.A., GenevaCompletedChildren Born With Serious Intra-uterine Growth Retardation
-
University Hospital, GrenobleRegistre de Handicap de l'Enfant et Observatoire Périnatal (RHEOP) Isère,... and other collaboratorsUnknownStillbirth | Infant, Small for Gestational Age | Intrauterine Growth RetardationFrance
-
University of South FloridaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Visual interpretation
-
Seattle Children's HospitalCompletedLimited English Proficient Patients and FamiliesUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedTeledermatologyThailand
-
Kaiser PermanenteEnrolling by invitationEchocardiography, Transthoracic | Echocardiographic SoftwareUnited States
-
San Diego State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedSocial Anxiety Disorder | Social PhobiaUnited States
-
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical...RecruitingDiagnostic Imaging | Artificial Intelligence (AI) | Common Systemic DiseasesChina
-
Jinling Hospital, ChinaNot yet recruitingIntracranial Aneurysm | CT Angiography | Cluster Randomized Trial | AI (Artificial Intelligence)
-
University of Massachusetts, WorcesterCompleted
-
University of HoustonCompletedAnxiety DisordersUnited States
-
University of DenverNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of California, Los AngelesCompletedAnxiety DisordersUnited States
-
Norwegian Institute of Public HealthHelse Vest; Norwegian Cancer Society; Helse Midt-Norge; Helse NordRecruiting