- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06016322
Dried Chicory Root in IBD (Chic-IBD)
The Effect of Dried Chicory Root on Inflammation, Gut Microbiota and Complaints in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Pilot Study
The goal of this clinical pilot trial is to test the use of dried chicory root in patients with IBD. The main questions it aims to answer are:
what the effect of a 4-week 10-20 g/day WholeFiberTM intervention on fecal calprotectin, IBD-complaints and QoL, serum inflammatory markers, gut microbiota and SCFA levels in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis Participants will receive 1 sachet of 10g WholeFiberTM for the first 2 weeks (equals 8.5 g fiber), and 2 sachets of 10g WholeFiberTM per day for the last two weeks (equals 17 g fiber).
Researchers will compare the above mentioned outcomes before and after the intervention.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Rationale: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), of which Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD) are the main types, includes recurring episodes of inflammation in the gastro-intestinal tract and severely impacts quality of life (QoL), leads to more hospitalization and increases the mortality risk. An impaired gut microbiota and lower levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) have been linked to the pathophysiology. A higher fiber intake is linked to positive changes in the gut microbiota and increase SCFA-production, however patients with IBD consume too little dietary fiber. WholeFiberTM, a dried vegetable rich in 4 types of prebiotic fiber, may be an easy solution to increase dietary fiber intake, impact the gut microbiota and SCFA, IBD-complaints and health parameters.
Objective: To explore the effect of a 4-week 10-20 g/day WholeFiberTM intervention on fecal calprotectin, IBD-complaints and QoL, serum inflammatory markers, gut microbiota and SCFA levels in patients with CD and UC.
Study design: this is a 4-week pilot study with one arm to explore the effects of a WholeFiberTM intervention. Measurements will take place before and after the intervention, questionnaires will also be conducted halfway.
Study population: in total 12 patients with mild to moderate IBD complaints will be included, of which 6 UC and 6 CD patients, to investigate if there is a difference between the two groups in efficacy of WholeFiberTM.
Intervention: Subjects will receive 1 sachet of 10g WholeFiberTM for the first 2 weeks (equals 8.5 g fiber), and 2 sachets of 10g WholeFiberTM per day for the last two weeks (equals 17 g fiber).
Main study parameters/endpoints: the primary parameter is change in fecal calprotectin after the 4-week intervention, which is a marker for inflammation in the gut. Secondary parameters are improvements in IBD-complaints, QoL, serum markers, and changes in the gut microbiota and increase in fecal SCFA-production. Moreover, it will be explored whether the response on the intervention will be different between UC and CD. Furthermore, an evaluation questionnaire will be conducted to assess feasibility and acceptance of the WholeFiberTM intervention in this population.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Groningen, Netherlands, 9713GZ
- University Medical Center Groningen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women aged ≥18 years;
- Having a diagnosis of IBD (either UC or CD) and undergoing treatment at the policlinic at the University Medical Center Groningen;
- Mild or moderate IBD, defined as fecal calprotectin levels ≥100 μg and Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) <8 for CD patients or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) <5 for UC patients;
- Using stable maintenance therapy for at least 12 weeks;
- Being able to read and speak Dutch;
- Willing to come to the University Medical Center Groningen for practical reasons (visiting the study site);
- Willing to continue their regular lifestyle patterns during the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having a medical history that may impact study outcomes, such as a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2, heart disease, renal disease, cancer, celiac disease;
- Having an ileostomy or colostomy, as this greatly impacts bowel function and gut microbiota composition;
- Having a clinically significant stenosis;
- Use of antibiotics <4 weeks before study start;
- Use of prebiotics, probiotics and/or synbiotic (this should be stopped 4 weeks before start of the study) or other fiber supplements such as psyllium;
- Use of tube feeding or sib-feeding;
- Being pregnant or lactating;
- Participation in another clinical study at the same time;
- Unable or unwilling to comply to study rules
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Before and after study in 6 patients with UC and 6 patients wiht CD
This is a 4-week before-after pilot study to explore the effectiveness of a WholeFiber Trademark (TM) intervention (a dried vegetable rich in prebiotic intrinsic fibers) on inflammation, fecal gut microbiota and metabolites, IBD-complaints and QoL and assesses its feasibility.
In this before-after study, 12 patients with IBD will receive WholeFiberTM; of which 6 patients with CD and 6 patients with UC to assess if there is a difference in effect between these groups of patients.
|
Subjects will receive 1 sachet of 10g WholeFiberTM for the first 2 weeks (equals 8.5 g fiber), and 2 sachets of 10g WholeFiberTM per day for the last two weeks (equals 17 g fiber). WholeFiberTM is a fiber-rich dried vegetable made from the chicory root that contains four types of prebiotic fibers (inulin, pectin, cellulose, hemi-cellulose).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
change in fecal calprotectin
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week 10-20 g/day WholeFiberTM intervention on fecal calprotectin levels in patients with CD and UC.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in IBD complaints by HBI for CD
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention on IBD-complaints in patients with CD measured by the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI)
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in IBD complaints by SCCAI for UC
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention on IBD-complaints in patients UC measured by the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI)
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in QOL measured by IBDQ
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on QoL measured by the IBDQ (Irvine 1999)
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in the Food-related Quality of Life (FrQOL)
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on Food-related QoL measured by a validated instrument by Hughes et al 2015
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in stool consistency
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on stool consistency.
Stool consistency will be measured using the validated Bristol Stool Chart.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in stool frequency
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on stool frequency.
Patients will be asked how often they defecated per day during the past week
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in fecal microbiota composition: Shannon-index
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on fecal microbiota composition.
Next generation sequencing will be used ot determine bacterial richness (Shannon-index)
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in fecal microbiota composition by beta-diversity
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on fecal microbiota composition.
Next generation sequencing will be used ot determine bacterial interindividual variations (beta-diversity)
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in fecal SCFA levels: lactate
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention on fecal lactate in patients with CD and UC measured by a conductivity detector.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in fecal SCFA levels: formate
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention on fecal formate in patients with CD and UC measured by a conductivity detector.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in fecal SCFA levels; butyrate
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention on fecal butyrate in patients with CD and UC measured by a conductivity detector.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in fecal SCFA levels: propionate
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention on fecal propionate in patients with CD and UC measured by a conductivity detector.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in fecal SCFA levels: acetate
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention on fecal acetate in patients with CD and UC measured by a conductivity detector.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in fecal acidity (pH)
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on fecal acidity (pH) by a PCE-228-R pH and redox meter in a stool sample.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in fecal redox status
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on fecal redox status, measured by PCE-228-R instrument.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum leukocytes
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on leukocytes count.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum thrombocytes
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on thrombocytes.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum iron status: serum iron
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC serum iron [micromol/L]
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum iron status: Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) [micromol/L]
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum iron status: ferritin
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on ferritin [microg/L]
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum iron status: transferrin
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on transferrin [g/L]
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum ALAT
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT).
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum ASAT
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on Aspartate Aminotransferase (ALAT).
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum GGT
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in serum creatinine
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on iron status.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in C-reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on C-reactive protein (CRP), which is an inflammation marker.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in inflammatory marker IL-6 analysed by an ELISA kit
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on the inflammatory marker IL-6 on an ELISA kit
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in inflammatory marker IL-8 analysed by an ELISA kit
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on the inflammatory marker IL-8 on an ELISA kit
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in inflammatory marker IL-10 analysed by an ELISA kit
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on the inflammatory marker IL-10 on an ELISA kit
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in inflammatory markers IL-12 analysed by an ELISA kit
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on the inflammatory marker IL-12 on an ELISA kit
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in inflammatory markerIL-17a analysed by an ELISA kit
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on the inflammatory marker IL-17a on an ELISA kit
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in inflammatory marker IL-22 analysed by an ELISA kit
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on the inflammatory marker IL-22 on an ELISA kit
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in inflammatory marker IL-23 analysed by an ELISA kit
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on the inflammatory marker IL-23 on an ELISA kit
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in inflammatory marker TNF-alpha analysed by an ELISA kit
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on the inflammatory marker TNF-alpha on an ELISA kit
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in inflammatory marker Interferon(IFN)-gamma analysed by an ELISA kit
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on the inflammatory marker Interferon(IFN)-gamma on an ELISA kit
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Change in oxidative stress measured by free thiols
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the effect of a 4-week WholeFiberTM intervention in patients with CD and UC on oxidative stress measured by free thiols.
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in change in fecal calprotectin between patients with CD and UC
Time Frame: difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
To explore the difference between CD an UC in change in the effect of a 4-week 10-20 g/day WholeFiberTM intervention on fecal calprotectin levels
|
difference between baseline and after 4-week intervention
|
|
Appreciation of WholeFiberTM evaluated by patients with CD and UC?
Time Frame: after 4-week intervention
|
How participants with CD and UC appreciated of WholeFiberTM by chosing a digit on a vascale from 1 to 10, being 1 the lowest number of appreciation and 10 the highest number
|
after 4-week intervention
|
|
The convenience of the use of WholeFiberTM evaluated by patients with CD and UC?
Time Frame: after 4-week intervention
|
Participants are asked to rate the following statement "I find Whole Fiber easy to use" and can answer on a Lickert with 5 different categories: 1. completely disagree 2. disagree 3. neutral, 4 agree 5. completely agree.
|
after 4-week intervention
|
|
The palatability of the use of WholeFiberTM evaluated by patients with CD and UC?
Time Frame: after 4-week intervention
|
Participants are asked to rate the following statement "I find Whole Fiber tasty to eat" and can answer on a Lickert with 5 different categories: 1. completely disagree 2. disagree 3. neutral, 4 agree 5. completely agree.
|
after 4-week intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Puhlmann ML, de Vos WM. Back to the Roots: Revisiting the Use of the Fiber-Rich Cichorium intybusL. Taproots. Adv Nutr. 2020 Jul 1;11(4):878-889. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa025. Erratum In: Adv Nutr. 2021 Jul 30;12(4):1598.
- Peters V, Dijkstra G, Campmans-Kuijpers MJE. Are all dietary fibers equal for patients with inflammatory bowel disease? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Rev. 2022 Apr 8;80(5):1179-1193. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab062.
- Puhlmann ML, de Vos WM. Intrinsic dietary fibers and the gut microbiome: Rediscovering the benefits of the plant cell matrix for human health. Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 18;13:954845. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.954845. eCollection 2022.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NL85061.042.23
- KIEM.K23.01.148 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NWO)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
-
Cook Children's Health Care SystemNot yet recruitingIBD | IBD - Inflammatory Bowel Disease | IBD (Inflammatory Bowel Disease)United States
-
Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili HospitalRecruitingInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)China
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRecruitingIBD - Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseItaly
-
Chang Kyun LeeChonnam National University Hospital; Kyungpook National University Hospital; Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine and other collaboratorsRecruitingInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)Korea, Republic of
-
Xijing HospitalNot yet recruitingInflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD)China
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedInflammatory Bowel Disease 11Canada
-
University of ChicagoTerminatedInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)United States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterEnrolling by invitationInflammatory Bowel Disease | Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)United States
-
University Hospital, GrenobleInstitute for Advanced Biosciences (IAB), GrenobleNot yet recruitingInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)France
Clinical Trials on Dried Chicory Root
-
University Medical Center GroningenRecruiting
-
Wageningen UniversityWageningen University and Research; WholeFiber BV; Wageningen University and... and other collaboratorsRecruitingBowel Function DissatisfactionNetherlands
-
Phytomedics Inc.University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at DallasCompleted
-
Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KGCompletedCommon ColdUnited Kingdom
-
Fatma Özsel ÖzcanCompletedInflammation | Glucose Metabolism | Exercise Metabolism | Sport Nutrition | Fat MetabolismTurkey
-
University of ManitobaEnrolling by invitation
-
University of California, DavisCompletedHealthy, Postmenopausal Women
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedIntrabony Periodontal DefectEgypt
-
Indiana UniversityPurdue University; Indiana University School of MedicineRecruitingT Cell Response to Dried Plum | Vitamin D Influence on Immune Response | Dried Plum and Immune FunctionUnited States
-
VA Palo Alto Health Care SystemTerminatedSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States