Hispanic Adapted and Culturally Relevant Exercising Together (HACER)

March 17, 2026 updated by: University of Arizona

A Pilot Feasibility Study of a Culturally Adapted Partnered Strength Training Intervention for Hispanic Cancer Survivors and Their Caregivers

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and effects of an adapted Exercising Together, a partnered resistance training program, on the physical and mental health of prostate cancer survivors and their informal caregiver. The Exercising Together program is designed to promote teamwork during supervised group exercise classes delivered remotely through videoconferencing software. The intervention period will be 3-months with a 3-month follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85719
        • University of Arizona Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Phase 1:

Inclusion Criteria (Survivor only):

  1. Self-identifies as Hispanic
  2. Histologically confirmed prostate cancer diagnosis (self-report)
  3. Completed primary treatment at least 6 weeks prior at time of enrollment
  4. Has an identified caregiver in any relationship role (e.g., spouse, sibling, parent, friend) who can participate with them.

Inclusion Criteria (Caregivers):

1. Identifies as an individual (e.g., family member or friend) who provides unpaid care or support to a participating prostate cancer survivor.

Inclusion Criteria (Survivors and Caregivers):

  1. ≥18 years of age
  2. Understands (ability to read and speak) English or Spanish and able to provide informed consent
  3. Meets the American College of Sports Medicine pre-participation screening criteria for exercise
  4. Ability to ambulate (with or without assistive devices)
  5. Willing to attend study group exercise classes online, complete remote assessments, and answer online surveys
  6. Has access to a mobile device with camera and internet.
  7. Able to participate in classes at same time as other participating member.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognitive difficulties that preclude answering the survey questions, participating in the exercise classes or performance tests, or providing informed consent as determined by the professional opinion of the Principal Investigator
  2. A medical condition, movement or neurological disorder, or medication use that contraindicates participation in moderate intensity exercise or poses a significant safety concern/risk for the well-being of the participant (e.g., declared pregnancy, poorly controlled diabetes, recent cardiac event, neuromuscular disease, untreated orthostatic hypertension, recent surgery, acute hernia, acute rheumatoid arthritis, severe memory disorders, severe balance disorder, severe hearing or vision impairment)
  3. Knowingly unable to attend >75% of the intervention classes due to conflict with the designated time of day, days of the week, and/or location for the exercise class which they initially enrolled
  4. Incapable of providing informed consent, answering survey questions, participating in the intervention, and following directions during performance testing when English or Spanish language is used
  5. Unable to be in the same location with participating member during remote exercise classes and performance testing and/or insufficient internet connectivity to support required videoconferencing software

Phase 2:

Inclusion Criteria (Survivor only):

  1. Histologically confirmed cancer diagnosis (self-report)
  2. Completed primary treatment at least 6 weeks prior at time of enrollment
  3. Has an identified caregiver in any relationship role (e.g., spouse, sibling, parent, friend) who can participate with them.

Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers remains the same as Phase 1 Exclusion Criteria remain the same as Phase 1

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exercising Together
Dyads perform partnered exercise over 1 hour, 3 days per week in a supervised, group setting remotely for 3 months.
The Exercising Together program is a partnered functional strength training program that encourages participating dyads to interact with one another, verbally and physically, during exercise sessions. In Exercising Together, the survivor and their caregiver will build skills to work as a team. We will incorporate skills that promote and reinforce communication, motivation, and support and use this to guide training of survivor-caregiver dyads to maximize their teamwork during each exercise session. Group sessions are delivered remotely through videoconferencing software and are supervised by two trained exercise instructors. Intervention and assessment is available in English or Spanish.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation Success - composite measure of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
Time Frame: 3 months
Implementation success is a composite measure that will be measured by a single questionnaire that will determine the extent to which the intervention is considered acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. The single questionnaire will consist of 3 measures that will be summed into one final score, The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Responses from AIM, IAM, and FIM are summary scored with a possible range of 12-60; higher scores indicate greater acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
3 months
Acceptability measured by adherence to intervention
Time Frame: 3 months
Acceptability will be measured by adherence to the intervention calculated as the total number of classes attended divided by the total possible schedule the patient could attend using descriptive statistics.
3 months
Appropriateness measured by retention rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Will be determined as the retention rate- calculated as the number of dyads completing the study versus consented using descriptive statistics.
3 months
Feasibility measured by enrollment rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Will be determined as the enrollment rate- the number of dyads enrolled out of those approached and eligible using descriptive statistics.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity
Time Frame: Physical activity will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Moderate to vigourous physical activity and sedentary time estimated using Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA)
Physical activity will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QOL) for the survivor
Time Frame: HR-QOL will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Measured by the 39 item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P), which includes subscales on physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being and an additional subscale specific to prostate cancer. Response items are five-point Likert scales, where higher scores indicate higher HR-QOL.physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. FACT-G is 27 items while FACT-P is 39 items. FACT-P includes an additional subscale specific to prostate cancer. Response items are five-point likert scales, where higher scores indicate higher HR-QOL.
HR-QOL will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Relationship Health
Time Frame: Relationship Health will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Measured by the Relationship Quality Index (RQI), a six-item assessment of communication and satisfaction on a five-point likert scale.
Relationship Health will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Objective Physical Function
Time Frame: Objective Physical Function will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) to determine ability to perform tasks of daily living independently. The SPPB includes 3 timed tests: 5 repeated chair stands, standing balance, and gait speed over 4 meters. The possible range of scores is 0-12.
Objective Physical Function will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QOL) for the caregiver
Time Frame: HR-QOL will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Measured by the 27 item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), which includes subscales on physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Response items are five-point Likert scales, where higher scores indicate higher HR-QOL.
HR-QOL will be measured over a 6 month period. It will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Meghan B Skiba, PhD, MS, MPH, RDN, University of Arizona College of Nursing Biobehavioral Health Science Division

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Exercising together

Subscribe