- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06018519
Relevant Outcome Measures for Creatine Transporter Deficiency Patient (CREAT_criteria)
A Prospective Study in Creatine Transporter Deficiency (SLC6A8) Patients to Determine the Most Relevant Outcome Measures
Creatine transport deficiency (CTD) is a rare genetic disorder related to pathogenic variants in the SLC6A8 gene, located on chromosome Xq28. Clinical diagnosis of CTD is based on clinical presentation, an increased urinary creatine/creatinine ratio and a severe decreased creatine peak on 1H-MRS magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
A retrospective study with questionnaires identified that most CTD patients had moderate to severe intellectual disability. Less than one third of patients were able to speak in sentences. Seizures were present in 59% of the patients. 41% had autistic features. Motor dysfunction was mentioned in 58%, and gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in 35% of the patients.
Several new therapeutic avenues are currently emerging in this disease for which no treatment has been available until now : cyclocreatine (interesting but unfortunately with very little clinical applicability due to its toxicity; dodecyl creatine ester incorporated into lipid nanocapsules with intranasal administration; pharmaco-chaperoning (for the folding-deficient creatine transporter variants, Ultragenyx pharmaceuticals new prodrug designed to deliver creatine to the brain (UX068). These new pharmacological treatment options may offer future opportunities to improve cognition in CTD patients.
A key issue is to determine outcome measures that are accessible to these patients, despite the importance of their cognitive deficit. In a preliminary study (on 31 CTD patients), investigators showed for example, that 75% of patients were unable to perform a Wechsler scale, which is one of the most used neuropsychological test to determine patient IQ (intelligence quotient). Most of the existing cognitive tests were developed to distinguish typically developing persons and ID (intellectual disability) patients, leading to a floor effect in the latter who systematically fail these tests. Therefore, these tests are not adapted to capture the potential effect of a drug in ID patient group. The identification of reliable and sensitive outcome measures for use in clinical trials in ID patients was recognized as a priority in a meeting convened by the NIH. N-of-1 trials (also called Single-Case Experimental Designs or SCEDs) appear of great interest for rare diseases, statistical power coming from the number of repeated measures, which leads to choose outcome measures that can be repeated multiple times.
This innovative study will allow to efficiently preparing future therapeutic trials, by specifying the phenotype of the patients, and by determining the most adapted outcome measures taking into account their cognitive deficiency and the type of experimental design to be used in the context of rare diseases.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Aurore CURIE, MD,PhD
- Phone Number: +33 06 70 62 69 76
- Email: aurore.curie@chu-lyon.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bron, France, 69500
- Recruiting
- Woman, mother and child hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon
-
Contact:
- Aurore CURIE, MD,PhD
- Phone Number: +33 06 70 62 69 76
- Email: aurore.curie@chu-lyon.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- Aurore CURIE, MD,PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Male CTD patients (n=24)
- Male CTD patients having a confirmed mutation in the SLC6A8 gene,
- Aged > 5 to < 35 years
- Whose maternal language is French,
- Having signed the informed consent and/or for whom parents/legal guardian have signed the informed consent,
- Affiliated to national Health Insurance system or parents/legal guardian affiliated to national health insurance system.
Female CTD patients (n=15)
- Female CTD patients having a confirmed mutation in the SLC6A8 gene,
- Aged > 5 to < 60 years,
- Whose maternal language is French,
- Having signed the informed consent and/or for whom parents/legal guardian have signed the informed consent.
- Affiliated to national Health Insurance system (sécurité sociale) or parents/legal guardian affiliated to national health insurance system
Sex- and chronological age-matched controls (n=24)
- Male
- Aged > 5 to < 35 years
- Whose maternal language is French,
- Having signed the informed consent and/or for whom parents/legal guardian have signed the informed consent,
- Affiliated to national health insurance system or parents/legal guardian affiliated to national health insurance system.
Sex- and chronological age-matched female controls (n=15)
- female,
- Aged > 5 to < 60 years,
- Whose maternal language is French,
- Having signed the informed consent and/or for whom parents/legal guardian have signed the informed consent
- Affiliated to national Health Insurance system (sécurité sociale) or parents/legal guardian affiliated to national health insurance system
Sex- and mental age-matched controls (n=39)
- Male and female
- Aged > 2 to < 8 years
- Whose maternal language is French,
- For whom parents/legal guardian have signed the informed consent,
- Affiliated to national health insurance system or parents/legal guardian affiliated to national health insurance system.
Typically developed children (n=80)
- Male and female
- Aged > 2 to < 8 years
- Whose maternal language is French,
- For whom parents/legal guardian have signed the informed consent,
- Affiliated to national health insurance system or parents/legal guardian affiliated to national health insurance system.
Sex- and chronological age-matched controls and Sex- and mental age-matched controls, aged < 8 years, could also be included in the Typically developed children group, as the data from the Typically developed children are only necessary to complete the developmental trajectory of the new tasks.
Non-inclusion Criteria:
CTD patients (n=39):
- Having a contraindication to the MRI examination (people using a pacemaker or an insulin pump, people wearing a metal prosthesis or an intracerebral clip, and claustrophobic subjects),
- Refusal of the subject and/or the subject's parents to be informed of possible abnormalities detected by MRI,
- Refusal of the subject and/or the subject's parents/legal guardian to be informed of possible abnormalities detected during the cardiac assessment.
Sex- and chronological age-matched controls (n=39)
- History of neurological or psychiatric disorder,
- Repetition of a grade,
- Learning disability requiring rehabilitation (speech therapy, psychomotor or oculomotor therapy),
- For participants agreeing on performing the MRI examination, having a contraindication to the MRI examination (use of a pacemaker or an insulin pump, people wearing a metal prosthesis or an intracerebral clip, and claustrophobic subjects) and refusal of the subject and/or the subject's parents/legal guardian to be informed of possible abnormalities detected by MRI.
Sex- and mental age-matched controls (n=39)
- History of neurological or psychiatric disorder,
- Repetition of a grade,
- Learning disability requiring rehabilitation (speech therapy, psychomotor or oculomotor therapy).
Typically developed children (n=80)
- History of neurological or psychiatric disorder,
- Repetition of a grade,
- Learning disability requiring rehabilitation (speech therapy, psychomotor or oculomotor therapy).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: CTD male patients
Case group 24 male CTD patients having a confirmed mutation in the SLC6A8 gene, aged > 5 to < 35 years.
|
10- Adaptive assessment with Vineland Adaptive Behavior scale II, 11- Mac Arthur questionnaire regarding language, 12- Pervasive Development Disorder in Mentally Retarded persons Scale (PDD-MRS), 13- Dunn sensory profile, 14- Aberrant Behavior Checklist, 15- Nisonger Child Behavior Rating form, 16- Social Responsiveness Scale 2, 17- Scales assessing the impact on primary caregiver (CBI-M/ Beach Center Family QOL)
18- Quality of life scale (PedsQL 4.0 for children or San Martin scale if the patient is older than 18)
19- Leiter 3 scale (4 cognitive sub-tests to be able to compute the non-verbal IQ and 2 non-verbal memory sub-tests) or Bayley 4 if Leiter 3 is not possible 20- CPM-BF 21- Simple reasoning task on tablet (match-to-sample task) 22- Implicit rules learning (modified Brixton), 23- 4 sub-tests from the WPPSI-IV ("zoo location" to assess spatial memory, "block design" to assess visuo-constructive abilities, "bug search" , "cancellation"), 24- Attention assessment (4 sub-tests from KITTAP: alert, go/no go, flexibility, divided attention), 25- Elementary visuo-spatial perception (on tablets) 26- EXALANG 3-6 (10 sub-tests testing for expressive and receptive language assessments), 27- PPVT-5 (receptive vocabulary), EVT-3 (expressive vocabulary), 28- Automatic language analysis (during a 10 minutes interaction, play). 29- Kinematic task (specifically designed), 30- Purdue-Pegboard test, 31- Renzi test 32- Eye-tracking analysis of social visual scenes and social preference index (movies), 33- theory of mind assessment, 34- ADOS scale (Autism Spectrum Disorder), 35- sensitivity to inequality, 36- pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist)
37- Structural, metabolic and functional data
38- ECG 39- Ultrasound 40- Blood sample 41- Urinary sample 42- Superficial skin biopsy |
|
Other: Sex and chronological age matched male controls
Control group 24 male, sex and chronological age matched controls, aged > 5 to < 35 years
|
19- Leiter 3 scale (4 cognitive sub-tests to be able to compute the non-verbal IQ and 2 non-verbal memory sub-tests) or Bayley 4 if Leiter 3 is not possible 20- CPM-BF 21- Simple reasoning task on tablet (match-to-sample task) 22- Implicit rules learning (modified Brixton), 23- 4 sub-tests from the WPPSI-IV ("zoo location" to assess spatial memory, "block design" to assess visuo-constructive abilities, "bug search" , "cancellation"), 24- Attention assessment (4 sub-tests from KITTAP: alert, go/no go, flexibility, divided attention), 25- Elementary visuo-spatial perception (on tablets) 26- EXALANG 3-6 (10 sub-tests testing for expressive and receptive language assessments), 27- PPVT-5 (receptive vocabulary), EVT-3 (expressive vocabulary), 28- Automatic language analysis (during a 10 minutes interaction, play). 29- Kinematic task (specifically designed), 30- Purdue-Pegboard test, 31- Renzi test 32- Eye-tracking analysis of social visual scenes and social preference index (movies), 33- theory of mind assessment, 34- ADOS scale (Autism Spectrum Disorder), 35- sensitivity to inequality, 36- pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist)
37- Structural, metabolic and functional data
40- Blood sample 41- Urinary sample 42- Superficial skin biopsy |
|
Other: Sex and mental age matched male controls
Control group 24 male, sex and mental age matched controls, aged > 2 to < 8 years
|
19- Leiter 3 scale (4 cognitive sub-tests to be able to compute the non-verbal IQ and 2 non-verbal memory sub-tests) or Bayley 4 if Leiter 3 is not possible 20- CPM-BF 21- Simple reasoning task on tablet (match-to-sample task) 22- Implicit rules learning (modified Brixton), 23- 4 sub-tests from the WPPSI-IV ("zoo location" to assess spatial memory, "block design" to assess visuo-constructive abilities, "bug search" , "cancellation"), 24- Attention assessment (4 sub-tests from KITTAP: alert, go/no go, flexibility, divided attention), 25- Elementary visuo-spatial perception (on tablets) 26- EXALANG 3-6 (10 sub-tests testing for expressive and receptive language assessments), 27- PPVT-5 (receptive vocabulary), EVT-3 (expressive vocabulary), 28- Automatic language analysis (during a 10 minutes interaction, play). 29- Kinematic task (specifically designed), 30- Purdue-Pegboard test, 31- Renzi test 32- Eye-tracking analysis of social visual scenes and social preference index (movies), 33- theory of mind assessment, 34- ADOS scale (Autism Spectrum Disorder), 35- sensitivity to inequality, 36- pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist) |
|
Other: Typically developed children
Control group 80 typically developed children aged > 2 to < 8 years, which corresponds to the mental age of CTD patients. 40 children aged > 2 to < 5 years, and 40 children aged > 6 to < 8 years will perform the newly developed outcome measures. |
19- Leiter 3 scale (4 cognitive sub-tests to be able to compute the non-verbal IQ and 2 non-verbal memory sub-tests) or Bayley 4 if Leiter 3 is not possible 20- CPM-BF 21- Simple reasoning task on tablet (match-to-sample task) 22- Implicit rules learning (modified Brixton), 23- 4 sub-tests from the WPPSI-IV ("zoo location" to assess spatial memory, "block design" to assess visuo-constructive abilities, "bug search" , "cancellation"), 24- Attention assessment (4 sub-tests from KITTAP: alert, go/no go, flexibility, divided attention), 25- Elementary visuo-spatial perception (on tablets) 26- EXALANG 3-6 (10 sub-tests testing for expressive and receptive language assessments), 27- PPVT-5 (receptive vocabulary), EVT-3 (expressive vocabulary), 28- Automatic language analysis (during a 10 minutes interaction, play). 29- Kinematic task (specifically designed), 30- Purdue-Pegboard test, 31- Renzi test 32- Eye-tracking analysis of social visual scenes and social preference index (movies), 33- theory of mind assessment, 34- ADOS scale (Autism Spectrum Disorder), 35- sensitivity to inequality, 36- pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist) |
|
Other: CTD female patients
15 female CTD patients having a confirmed mutation in the SLC6A8 gene, aged >5 to < 60 years
|
10- Adaptive assessment with Vineland Adaptive Behavior scale II, 11- Mac Arthur questionnaire regarding language, 12- Pervasive Development Disorder in Mentally Retarded persons Scale (PDD-MRS), 13- Dunn sensory profile, 14- Aberrant Behavior Checklist, 15- Nisonger Child Behavior Rating form, 16- Social Responsiveness Scale 2, 17- Scales assessing the impact on primary caregiver (CBI-M/ Beach Center Family QOL)
18- Quality of life scale (PedsQL 4.0 for children or San Martin scale if the patient is older than 18)
19- Leiter 3 scale (4 cognitive sub-tests to be able to compute the non-verbal IQ and 2 non-verbal memory sub-tests) or Bayley 4 if Leiter 3 is not possible 20- CPM-BF 21- Simple reasoning task on tablet (match-to-sample task) 22- Implicit rules learning (modified Brixton), 23- 4 sub-tests from the WPPSI-IV ("zoo location" to assess spatial memory, "block design" to assess visuo-constructive abilities, "bug search" , "cancellation"), 24- Attention assessment (4 sub-tests from KITTAP: alert, go/no go, flexibility, divided attention), 25- Elementary visuo-spatial perception (on tablets) 26- EXALANG 3-6 (10 sub-tests testing for expressive and receptive language assessments), 27- PPVT-5 (receptive vocabulary), EVT-3 (expressive vocabulary), 28- Automatic language analysis (during a 10 minutes interaction, play). 29- Kinematic task (specifically designed), 30- Purdue-Pegboard test, 31- Renzi test 32- Eye-tracking analysis of social visual scenes and social preference index (movies), 33- theory of mind assessment, 34- ADOS scale (Autism Spectrum Disorder), 35- sensitivity to inequality, 36- pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist)
37- Structural, metabolic and functional data
38- ECG 39- Ultrasound 40- Blood sample 41- Urinary sample 42- Superficial skin biopsy |
|
Other: Sex and mental age matched female controls
Control group 15 female, sex and mental age matched controls, aged > 2 to < 8 years
|
19- Leiter 3 scale (4 cognitive sub-tests to be able to compute the non-verbal IQ and 2 non-verbal memory sub-tests) or Bayley 4 if Leiter 3 is not possible 20- CPM-BF 21- Simple reasoning task on tablet (match-to-sample task) 22- Implicit rules learning (modified Brixton), 23- 4 sub-tests from the WPPSI-IV ("zoo location" to assess spatial memory, "block design" to assess visuo-constructive abilities, "bug search" , "cancellation"), 24- Attention assessment (4 sub-tests from KITTAP: alert, go/no go, flexibility, divided attention), 25- Elementary visuo-spatial perception (on tablets) 26- EXALANG 3-6 (10 sub-tests testing for expressive and receptive language assessments), 27- PPVT-5 (receptive vocabulary), EVT-3 (expressive vocabulary), 28- Automatic language analysis (during a 10 minutes interaction, play). 29- Kinematic task (specifically designed), 30- Purdue-Pegboard test, 31- Renzi test 32- Eye-tracking analysis of social visual scenes and social preference index (movies), 33- theory of mind assessment, 34- ADOS scale (Autism Spectrum Disorder), 35- sensitivity to inequality, 36- pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist) |
|
Other: Sex and chronological age matched female controls
Control group 15 female, sex and chronological age matched controls, aged > 5 to < 60 years
|
19- Leiter 3 scale (4 cognitive sub-tests to be able to compute the non-verbal IQ and 2 non-verbal memory sub-tests) or Bayley 4 if Leiter 3 is not possible 20- CPM-BF 21- Simple reasoning task on tablet (match-to-sample task) 22- Implicit rules learning (modified Brixton), 23- 4 sub-tests from the WPPSI-IV ("zoo location" to assess spatial memory, "block design" to assess visuo-constructive abilities, "bug search" , "cancellation"), 24- Attention assessment (4 sub-tests from KITTAP: alert, go/no go, flexibility, divided attention), 25- Elementary visuo-spatial perception (on tablets) 26- EXALANG 3-6 (10 sub-tests testing for expressive and receptive language assessments), 27- PPVT-5 (receptive vocabulary), EVT-3 (expressive vocabulary), 28- Automatic language analysis (during a 10 minutes interaction, play). 29- Kinematic task (specifically designed), 30- Purdue-Pegboard test, 31- Renzi test 32- Eye-tracking analysis of social visual scenes and social preference index (movies), 33- theory of mind assessment, 34- ADOS scale (Autism Spectrum Disorder), 35- sensitivity to inequality, 36- pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist)
37- Structural, metabolic and functional data
40- Blood sample 41- Urinary sample 42- Superficial skin biopsy |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical endpoints : number of epileptic seizures
Time Frame: Up to 90 Days
|
Number of epileptic seizures
|
Up to 90 Days
|
|
Clinical endpoints : antiepileptic treatment
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: all examinations at V1 (Day 1/Day2) For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: examinations repeated every two weeks at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90).
|
Change in antiepileptic treatment (increase or decrease)
|
For all 24 CTD patients: all examinations at V1 (Day 1/Day2) For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: examinations repeated every two weeks at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90).
|
|
Clinical endpoints : Visual analogical scale
Time Frame: Up to 90 Days
|
Visual analogical scale on a target symptom defined with the parents,
|
Up to 90 Days
|
|
Clinical endpoints : actimetry
Time Frame: Up to 90 Days
|
Actimetry data over 48 hours
|
Up to 90 Days
|
|
Clinical endpoints : podometry
Time Frame: Up to 90 Days
|
Podometry data over 24 hours
|
Up to 90 Days
|
|
Clinical endpoints : walk test
Time Frame: Up to 90 Days
|
6 minutes' walk test
|
Up to 90 Days
|
|
Clinical endpoints : Clinical examination
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: all examinations at V1 (Day 1/Day2) For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: examinations repeated every two weeks at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90).
|
Clinical examination
|
For all 24 CTD patients: all examinations at V1 (Day 1/Day2) For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: examinations repeated every two weeks at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90).
|
|
Clinical endpoints :Feasibility of performing an MRI
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: all examinations at V1 (Day 1/Day2) For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: examinations repeated every two weeks at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90).
|
Feasibility of performing an MRI without any anesthesia on a mock scanner
|
For all 24 CTD patients: all examinations at V1 (Day 1/Day2) For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: examinations repeated every two weeks at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90).
|
|
Parental questionnaires : Vineland Adaptive Behavior scale II
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90).
|
Adaptive assessment with Vineland Adaptive Behavior scale II
|
For all 24 CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90).
|
|
Parental questionnaires : Mac Arthur questionnaire
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90).
|
Mac Arthur questionnaire regarding language
|
For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90).
|
|
Parental questionnaires : PDD-MRS
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90).
|
Pervasive Development Disorder in Mentally Retarded persons Scale (PDD-MRS)
|
For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90).
|
|
Parental questionnaires : Dunn sensory profile
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90).
|
Dunn sensory profile
|
For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90).
|
|
Parental questionnaires : Aberrant Behavior Checklist
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90).
|
Aberrant Behavior Checklist
|
For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90).
|
|
Parental questionnaires : Nisonger Child Behavior Rating form
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90).
|
Nisonger Child Behavior Rating form
|
For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90).
|
|
Parental questionnaires : Social Responsiveness Scale 2
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90).
|
Social Responsiveness Scale 2
|
For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90).
|
|
Parental questionnaires : impact on primary caregiver
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90).
|
Scales assessing the impact on primary caregiver (CBI-M/ Beach Center Family QOL)
|
For all 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90).
|
|
Quality of life scale
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: At V1 (Day1/Day2) For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: Repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90).
|
Quality of life scale (PedsQL 4.0 for children or San Martin scale if the patient is older than 18)
|
For all 24 CTD patients: At V1 (Day1/Day2) For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: Repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90).
|
|
Cognitive assessments : Leiter 3 scale
Time Frame: For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
Leiter 3 scale (4 cognitive sub-tests to be able to compute the non-verbal IQ and 2 non-verbal memory sub-tests) or Bayley 4 if Leiter 3 is not possible
|
For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Cognitive assessments : CPM-BF
Time Frame: For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
CPM-BF : Raven's coloured Progressive Matrices
|
For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Cognitive assessments : reasoning task
Time Frame: For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
Simple reasoning task on tablet (match-to-sample task)
|
For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Cognitive assessments : Implicit rules learning
Time Frame: For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
Implicit rules learning (modified Brixton),
|
For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Cognitive assessments : WPPSI-IV
Time Frame: For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
4 sub-tests from the WPPSI-IV ("zoo location" to assess spatial memory, "block design" to assess visuo-constructive abilities, "bug search" , "cancellation"),
|
For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Cognitive assessments : Attention assessment
Time Frame: For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
Attention assessment (4 sub-tests from KITTAP: alert, go/no go, flexibility, divided attention),
|
For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Cognitive assessments : Elementary visuo-spatial perception
Time Frame: For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
Elementary visuo-spatial perception (on tablets)
|
For the 24 CTD patients: at V1 (Day1/Day2), For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V2 (Day15), V3 (Day30), V4 (Day45), V5 (Day60), V6 (Day75) and V7 (Day90). Controls: Cognitive assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Language assessments : EXALANG 3-6
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Language assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
EXALANG 3-6 - Computerized battery for the evaluation of oral and written language : 10 sub-tests testing for expressive and receptive language assessments
|
For all 24 CTD patients: performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Language assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Language assessments : vocabulary
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Language assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
PPVT-5 : Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Fifth Edition = receptive vocabulary, EVT-3 : Expressive Vocabulary Test third edition,
|
For all 24 CTD patients: performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Language assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Language assessments : Automatic language analysis
Time Frame: For all 24 CTD patients: performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Language assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
Automatic language analysis (during a 10 minutes interaction, play).
|
For all 24 CTD patients: performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). For 9 out of 24 CTD patients: repeated at V3 (Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Language assessment at V1(Day 1)
|
|
Motor assessments : Kinematic task
Time Frame: CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls: Motor assessment at V1 (Day 1)
|
Kinematic task (specifically designed)
|
CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls: Motor assessment at V1 (Day 1)
|
|
Motor assessments : Purdue-Pegboard test
Time Frame: CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2), V3(Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Motor assessment at V1 (Day 1)
|
Purdue-Pegboard test
|
CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2), V3(Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Motor assessment at V1 (Day 1)
|
|
Motor assessments : Renzi test
Time Frame: CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2), V3(Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Motor assessment at V1 (Day 1)
|
Renzi test
|
CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2), V3(Day30), and V7 (Day90). Controls: Motor assessment at V1 (Day 1)
|
|
Social assessments : Eye-tracking
Time Frame: CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2), V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
Eye-tracking analysis of social visual scenes and social preference index (movies)
|
CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2), V3 (Day30) and V7 (Day90). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
|
Social assessments : Theory of mind assessment
Time Frame: CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
Theory of mind assessment
|
CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
|
Social assessments : ADOS scale (Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale)
Time Frame: CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
ADOS scale (Autism Spectrum Disorder)
|
CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
|
Social assessments : Sensitivity to inequality
Time Frame: CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
Sensitivity to inequality
|
CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
|
Social assessments : Pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist)
Time Frame: CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
Pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist)
|
CTD patients : performed at V1 (Day1/Day2). Controls : Social assessment at V1(Day1)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Neuroimaging (MRI)
Time Frame: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
The MRI will be performed to describe structural and functional neuroanatomical profile of CTD patient in comparison to chronological age-matched controls and variability in creatine peak assessment using MR spectroscopy
|
V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
|
Cardiac assessments : Electrocardiogram
Time Frame: CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
Electrocardiogram (ECG) will be performed to describe CTD patients cardiac profile (especially the risk of increased QTC and/or cardiac echography abnormality)
|
CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
|
Cardiac assessments : Ultrasound
Time Frame: CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
Cardiac Ultrasound will be performed to describe CTD patients cardiac profile (especially the risk of increased QTC and/or cardiac echography abnormality)
|
CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
|
Biological collection : Blood sample
Time Frame: CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
Blood sample (plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells)
|
CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
|
Biological collection : Urine sample
Time Frame: CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
Urine sample will be collected to create a collection of biological samples associated with clinical and genomic data from CTD patients.
In the future this will be usefull for research labs to investigate new biomarkers (not identified yet) or to test for the efficiency of new therapeutic approaches in vitro (on cultivated fibroblasts or after the development of iPS cells or organoïds) in this rare disease.
|
CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
|
Biological collection : Superficial skin biopsy
Time Frame: CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
Superficial skin biopsy will be performed to get cultivated fibroblasts to create a collection of biological samples associated with clinical and genomic data from CTD patients.
In the future this will be usefull for research labs to investigate new biomarkers (not identified yet) or to test for the efficiency of new therapeutic approaches in vitro (on cultivated fibroblasts or after the development of iPS cells or organoïds) in this rare disease.
|
CTD patients: V1 (Day1/Day2)
|
|
Biological collection : biological profile of DTC patients compared to sex- and chronological age-matched controls
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
|
To describe the biological profile of DTC patients compared to sex- and chronological age-matched controls. Biological profile will be performed for CTD patients and the sex- and chronological age- matched controls who agreed on participating to the biological collection. |
Up to 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 69HCL21_0655
- 2022-A02063-40 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Creatine Transporter Defect
-
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical IncTerminatedCreatine Deficiency, X-linkedUnited States, Canada
-
University of IdahoCompleted
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)CompletedGlucose Metabolism Disorders | Epilepsy | Glucose Transporter Type 1 Deficiency Syndrome | Glut1 Deficiency Syndrome 1, Autosomal Recessive | Glucose Transporter Protein Type 1 Deficiency Syndrome | Glucose Transport Defect | GLUT1DS1United States
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingCreatine Transporter Deficiency | Fragile X Syndrome (FXS)France
-
Juan PascualNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)CompletedGlucose Metabolism Disorders | Epilepsy | Glucose Transporter Type 1 Deficiency Syndrome | Glut1 Deficiency Syndrome 1, Autosomal Recessive | Glucose Transporter Protein Type 1 Deficiency Syndrome | Glucose Transport Defect | GLUT1DS1United States
-
Vrije Universiteit BrusselCompletedHealthy | Creatine SupplementationBelgium
-
Universitas Negeri MalangCompletedExercise Ergogenics | Creatine SupplementationIndonesia
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompletedCreatine Synthesis in Healthy SubjectsUnited States
-
Karen Lindhardt MadsenRigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedCarnitine Transporter, Plasma-membrane, Deficiency of
-
Natalia Valadares de MoraesHospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão PretoUnknown
Clinical Trials on Clinical endpoints
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalWake Forest University Health Sciences; National Center for Complementary and...Completed
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedRecurrent IDHwt Gliomas With FGFR3-TACC3 Fusion | Recurrent IDHwt Gliomas With FGFR1-TACC1 FusionFrance
-
Corporacion Parc TauliRecruitingSimulation | Learning | Students, Medical | Feedback | Competency-based EducationSpain
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Completed
-
Faculty of Dental Medicine for GirlsActive, not recruitingPlaque | Patient Satisfaction | Post Operative Pain | Caries, CervicalEgypt
-
Florida International UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of MiamiCompletedDisruptive BehaviorUnited States
-
Duke UniversityCompletedRotator Cuff TearUnited States
-
Institut de Recherches Cliniques de MontrealCompleted
-
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore...Recruiting
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityCompletedHematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm | Malignant Solid NeoplasmUnited States