The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Treatment Adherence, Self-Efficacy, and Satisfaction in Individuals With Diabetic Foot Ulcers

September 3, 2023 updated by: Nida Efetürk, Istanbul Okan Univesitesi

The Effect of Watson's Human Care Theory-Based Motivational Interviewing on Treatment Adherence, Self-Efficacy, and Satisfaction in Individuals With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The rise in diabetes incidence has led to a corresponding increase in diabetes-related complications. Diabetic foot ulcers, a severe consequence of diabetes, have substantial impacts on patients, the social environment, overall well-being, and nursing procedures. Given this context, there is a clear necessity for interventions that motivate patients to adopt beneficial health behaviors and educate them in effectively managing diabetes-related complications. This study seeks to investigate the impact of Watson's motivational interviewing method, which is grounded in the human care theory, on enhancing treatment adherence, self-efficacy, and satisfaction levels among individuals suffering from diabetic foot ulcers.

Hypotheses of The Research H0: There is no difference in self-efficacy for diabetic foot care, diabetic foot care behavior, treatment adherence, and satisfaction between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education, and those who receive standard education.

H1: There is a difference in self-efficacy for diabetic foot care between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education.

H2: There is a difference in diabetic foot care behavior between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education.

H3: There is a difference in treatment adherence between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education.

H4: There is a difference in satisfaction between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) data, there are currently 425 million adults worldwide affected by diabetes, and it is projected to increase to 578 million by 2030 and 700 million by 2045. The increasing prevalence of diabetes has led to a rise in the frequency of complications arising from diabetes. The escalation in diabetes complications and their consequences is concerning. There is a need for interventions that encourage positive changes in health behaviors among patients and teach better management of diabetes-related complications.

Diabetic foot ulcer, a challenging complication of diabetes, has significant effects on physical, mental, social, and economic well-being, leading to reduced quality of life. It often necessitates prolonged hospitalizations, intensive treatment, and high medical costs. One of the nursing models frequently preferred today is the Human Care Theory, developed by Jean Watson between 1975 and 1979. The Human Care Theory is centered around providing quality care to patients and maintaining effective communication. Motivational Interviewing is a counseling approach developed by clinical psychologists William R. Miller and Stephen Rollnick.

The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing method on treatment adherence, self-efficacy, and satisfaction in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers. In this study, a randomized controlled experimental-control group experimental design will be used. The population of the study consists of patients who applied to Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital Internal Medicine outpatient clinics between June and October 2023, diagnosed with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, with first degree diabetic foot wound according to the Wagner classification. With the power analysis program G-Power 3.1.9.2, the sample size was calculated as 38 people (76) in each group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with clear consciousness,
  • No communication problems,
  • Diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes,
  • Grade 1 diabetic foot ulcer according to the Wagner classification,
  • Receiving standard wound care,
  • Residing in the Kocaeli province,
  • No musculoskeletal or neurological disorders that could interfere with the study,
  • Individuals willing to participate and who sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria and those who decline to participate in the study will not be included.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: control
Experimental: experimental
Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing method
The Motivational Interviewing Program based on Watson's Theory of Human Caring will be conducted over an 8-week period, with sessions taking place once a week. The initial session will have a duration of 60 minutes, while the subsequent weekly sessions will last for 30 minutes
Other Names:
  • Pre-post test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wagner's ulcer classification scale
Time Frame: at 1 week
The Wagner classification divides ulcers based on the depth of the wound and the extent of gangrene. Grade 0, Skin intact but bony deformities lead to "foot at risk"; Grade 1, Superficial ulcer; Grade 2, Deeper, full thickness extension; Grade 3, Deep abscess formation or osteomyelitis; Grade 4, Partial Gangrene of forefoot; Grade 5; Extensive Gangrene.
at 1 week
Wagner's ulcer classification scale
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
The Wagner classification divides ulcers based on the depth of the wound and the extent of gangrene. Grade 0, Skin intact but bony deformities lead to "foot at risk"; Grade 1, Superficial ulcer; Grade 2, Deeper, full thickness extension; Grade 3, Deep abscess formation or osteomyelitis; Grade 4, Partial Gangrene of forefoot; Grade 5; Extensive Gangrene.
at 8 weeks
Wagner's ulcer classification scale
Time Frame: at 12 weeks
The Wagner classification divides ulcers based on the depth of the wound and the extent of gangrene. Grade 0, Skin intact but bony deformities lead to "foot at risk"; Grade 1, Superficial ulcer; Grade 2, Deeper, full thickness extension; Grade 3, Deep abscess formation or osteomyelitis; Grade 4, Partial Gangrene of forefoot; Grade 5; Extensive Gangrene.
at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: at 1 week
It was developed to assess individuals' perception of their ability to perform diabetic foot care activities. The lowest score obtainable from the scale is 0, and the highest is 90. An increase in scale score indicates a higher level of individual self-efficacy.
at 1 week
Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
It was developed to assess individuals' perception of their ability to perform diabetic foot care activities. The lowest score obtainable from the scale is 0, and the highest is 90. An increase in scale score indicates a higher level of individual self-efficacy.
at 8 weeks
Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: at 12 weeks
It was developed to assess individuals' perception of their ability to perform diabetic foot care activities. The lowest score obtainable from the scale is 0, and the highest is 90. An increase in scale score indicates a higher level of individual self-efficacy.
at 12 weeks
Medication Adherence Report Scale
Time Frame: at 1 week
The scale consists of 5 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores obtained from the items are summed to calculate the total test score. An increase in the total score obtained from the scale indicates agreement, while a decrease indicates disagreement
at 1 week
Medication Adherence Report Scale
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
The scale consists of 5 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores obtained from the items are summed to calculate the total test score. An increase in the total score obtained from the scale indicates agreement, while a decrease indicates disagreement
at 8 weeks
Medication Adherence Report Scale
Time Frame: at 12 weeks
The scale consists of 5 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores obtained from the items are summed to calculate the total test score. An increase in the total score obtained from the scale indicates agreement, while a decrease indicates disagreement
at 12 weeks
Watson Patient Satisfaction Assessment Form According to Healing Processes
Time Frame: at 8 weeks
The form consists of a total of six questions. The first five questions are scored on a scale of 1 to 7, with responses ranging from 'never' (1) to 'always' (7).
at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Foot Ulcer, Diabetic

Clinical Trials on Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing method

3
Subscribe