- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06038591
Parent Intervention to Improve Child Sleep
April 1, 2025 updated by: Elizabeth Adams, University of South Carolina
Parenting Intervention to Improve Young Children's Sleep Among Families With Low Income
In this study, the investigators pilot tested a parenting intervention to improve young children's sleep in families with low income.
Families were randomized to an intervention or wait-list control group.
The investigators hypothesized the intervention would be feasible and acceptable to enrolled families.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This pilot study tested a parenting intervention to improve young children's sleep in families with low income using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.
Parents were randomized to the intervention or wait-list control group.
Intervention content was delivered in virtual sessions with a parent and interventionist.
The primary aim was to examine intervention feasibility (e.g., recruitment, retention, acceptability) with a secondary goal of preliminary efficacy on intervention changes in child sleep patterns to inform a future large-scale RCT.
Exploratory evidence was collected on changes in children's health behaviors (e.g., diet, screen time), and social-emotional health (e.g., behavior problems) as indicators for potential spillover effects on these domains.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
South Carolina
-
Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29204
- South Carolina early childhood support state agencies
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Parents or primary caregivers 18 years of age or older
- Have a child 2-4 years of age
- Child's 24-hour sleep duration does not meet established recommendations based on child age
- English speaking
- Annual household income <= 200% of the Federal Poverty Line or receive assistance benefits (e.g., SNAP, WIC)
- Computer or phone access for video calls
Exclusion Criteria:
- Parent or child has a medical condition that impairs their ability to participate
- Child has a clinical sleep disorder
- Child takes medication that significantly impacts their sleep
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sleep Intervention
The sleep intervention focuses on enhancing young children's sleep by providing parents with behavioral strategies and support.
Interventionists will work with parents on establishing consistent soothing bedtime routines; behavioral regulation to manage bedtime resistance and nighttime wakings; goal setting, problem solving, and action planning; self-monitoring via daily sleep logs; and stimulus control of child's sleep environment.
|
The sleep intervention focuses on enhancing young children's sleep by providing parents with behavioral strategies and support.
Interventionists will work with parents on establishing consistent soothing bedtime routines; behavioral regulation to manage bedtime resistance and nighttime wakings; goal setting, problem solving, and action planning; self-monitoring via daily sleep logs; and stimulus control of child's sleep environment.
|
|
No Intervention: Comparison/control
The comparison arm is a no-contact control group.
Parents and children will not receive any intervention.
They will be placed on a wait-list, and then offered the sleep intervention once the post-assessments are complete.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intervention feasibility: recruitment screening eligibility
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Percent of children screened who were eligible
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Intervention feasibility: recruitment duration
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Duration to reach the target sample
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Intervention feasibility: Enrollment yield for each recruitment strategy
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Percent of enrolled participants that were recruited via each recruitment strategy to determine the highest and lowest yielding strategies.
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Intervention feasibility: retention attendance
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Percent attendance at assessment visits
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Intervention feasibility: retention percentage
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Percent of sample retained at post-intervention
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Intervention feasibility: retention dropout
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Percent of sample that drops out or is lost to follow-up
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Intervention feasibility: retention dropout reasons
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Reasons for dropping out of the study
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Intervention acceptability
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Acceptability will be assessed in an exit survey with Likert scale items and open-ended questions about intervention likes/dislikes and suggestions for future changes.
Likert scale values range 1-5.
Higher numbers indicate better outcomes (e.g., more positive acceptability)
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Intervention feasibility: recruitment screening enrollment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Percent of eligible children who were enrolled
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Process measures: Intervention attendance
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Proportion of intervention sessions attended, including makeup sessions, obtained from attendance records.
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Process measure: Implementation
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Survey checklist completed by interventionists after each intervention session that assess implementation barriers
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Process measures: Content fidelity
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Checklist completed by researchers for each intervention session that evaluates the extent to which the program content was addressed
|
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Child sleep: night sleep duration
Time Frame: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
Wrist-worn actigraphy devices were used to calculate child's nighttime sleep duration
|
Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
|
Child sleep: daytime sleep duration
Time Frame: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
Wrist-worn actigraphy devices were used to calculate child's daytime sleep duration
|
Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
|
Child sleep: 24-hour sleep duration
Time Frame: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
Wrist-worn actigraphy devices were used to calculate child's 24-hour sleep duration
|
Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
|
Child sleep: sleep quality
Time Frame: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
Wrist-worn actigraphy devices were used to calculate child's sleep quality (e.g., wake after sleep onset)
|
Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
|
Child sleep: sleep timing
Time Frame: Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
Wrist-worn actigraphy devices were used to calculate variability in child's sleep timing
|
Baseline (0 weeks) and post-intervention (6 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 8, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 3, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
March 28, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 12, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
September 15, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 4, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 1, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00123879
- 5P20GM130420 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sleep
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonPhilips HealthcareCompletedSleep, Slow-wave Sleep, Sleep Enhancement, Sleep Optimization
-
Brain Electrophysiology Laboratory CompanyRecruiting
-
University GhentEuropean CommissionCompleted
-
Mahidol UniversityRamathibodi HospitalNot yet recruitingSleep Inertia | Sleep, Slow-wave Sleep, Sleep Enhancement, Sleep Optimization | Night Shift WorkThailand
-
Northumbria UniversityCompletedSleep | Mood | Poor Quality Sleep | Good Sleep HabitUnited Kingdom
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoEnrolling by invitationSleep | Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)Brazil
-
Atlas UniversityCompletedSleep | Surgery | Sleep QualityTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Mersin UniversityCompletedSleep Quality | Sleep PerceptionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalNot yet recruitingObstructive Sleep Apnea | Sleep-disordered BreathingUnited States
-
Institute of Nutrition, Slovenia (Nutris)Valens Int. d.o.o., Slovenija; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingSleep Quality | Sleep Onset LatencySlovenia
Clinical Trials on Sleep Tight
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedOrthopedic Disorder | Orthopedic Devices Associated With Misadventures
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)CompletedTransient Hypertension, PregnancyCanada
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie UniversityWithdrawnMarital RelationshipCanada
-
Lumenis Be Ltd.CompletedTo Verify Tissue Heating and Temperature Stability and Safety Throughout RF Treatment Duration Applied on the FaceUnited States
-
Lumenis Be Ltd.UnknownVagina AtrophyUnited States
-
Navy General Hospital, BeijingCompletedFetal Distress | Oxygen Inhalation Therapy | LabourChina
-
University of AmsterdamRecruitingParent-child Problem | Parent Training | Parent Child RelationshipNetherlands
-
Nantes University HospitalRecruiting
-
Mark D. DeBoer, MD, MSc., MCRDexCom, Inc.; Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.Active, not recruiting