Coracoid Tunnel Widening After ACJ Tight Rope Fixation

August 17, 2022 updated by: Mohamed Refaat Waly, Cairo University

The Correlation Between Coracoid Tunnel Dilatation and Loss of Reduction After Arthroscopic Acromioclavicular Fixation Using Tightrope System, A CT Based Study

studying coracoid tunnel widening after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using TightRope system and its correlation with loss of reduction and the functional scores.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Abstract Purpose: To detect coracoid tunnel widening after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using TightRope system and its correlation with loss of reduction and the functional scores.

Methods: From July 2016 to Dec 2018, a prospective study was performed at our hospital. Twenty-three patients with acute grade III-V ACJ dislocation were included in the study. Arthroscopic double tight-rope repair of the ACJ was performed. Coracoid tunnel widening was measured by computed tomography (CT) and coraco-clavicular distance was measured on the x-ray immediately post-operative and at 12 months. Constant Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, Nottingham Clavicle Score and Visual analogue scale were used as outcome measures at 12 months.

Level of evidence IV Keywords Acute acromioclavicular joint injury . TightRope . Coracoid tunnel dilatation. Loss of reduction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 60 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with acute (≤ 3 weeks after injury) Rockwood grade III-V ACJ dislocation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with associated coracoid fracture, associated rotator cuff tears or glenohumeral arthritis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: patient with Acute acromioclavicular joint injury
arthroscopic fixation of Acute acromioclavicular joint injury using tight rope
Adjustable button device from Arthrex Naples USA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coracoid tunnel diameter difference between immediate postoperative and final follow up
Time Frame: 1 year
Radiological outcome using CT scans
1 year
Coraco-clavicular distance immediate postoperative and at final follow up
Time Frame: 1 year
Radiological outcome using X-rays
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant-Murley shoulder score. Ranges from 0 representing worst outcome to 100 representing best outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical score using a questionnaire
1 year
Disability of arm shoulder and Hand score ( DASH score) highest is 100 which represents worst outcome while lowest is 0 representing best possible outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical score using a questionnaire
1 year
Oxford Shoulder score, a questionnaire of 12 questions each scores from 1 to 5. 1 being the fewest symptoms, 5 being the worst. The total score is 60 marks, the higher the score the worse the outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical score using a questionnaire
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthopedic Disorder

Clinical Trials on arthroscopic fixation of Acute acromioclavicular joint injury using tight rope

3
Subscribe