iTBS Effect on M1 Plasticity, Blood Glucose, and Cardiovascular Response

April 1, 2024 updated by: Wan Aliaa Wan Sulaiman, Universiti Putra Malaysia

The Effect of Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortical Plasticity, Blood Glucose, and Cardiovascular Response in Healthy Young Adults

Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a medical device that can alter motor cortical (M1) excitability through the scalp via various protocols. Among these, intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a novel protocol that enhances the M1 excitability for several minutes beyond stimulation. The changes in M1 excitability might in turn be accompanied by other physiological responses in the human body. This study will explore the effect of iTBS protocol on M1 plasticity, heart rate, blood pressure, and blood glucose in healthy young adults in comparison to sham stimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Selangor
      • Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia, 43400
        • Hospital Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Healthy young adults (18-35 years old)
  • Right-handed
  • Fully vaccinated against COVID-19

Exclusion criteria:

  • Subjects with contraindications to TMS based on the screening 13-item questionnaire for TMS candidacy
  • Smokers
  • Obese (BMI ≥ 30)
  • Highly active subjects
  • Active or previous lab-confirmed COVID-19 with long symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active then sham stimulation
Active iTBS over the left M1 hand region, followed after 1 week washout period by sham iTBS over the left M1 hand region
Active iTBS will be applied using a butterfly figure-of-eight C-B60 coil connected to MagPro R30 stimulator with add-on Theta Burst option (MagVenture A/S, Farum, Denmark).
Sham iTBS will be applied using acoustic stimulation of a second coil behind the participant's head
Experimental: Sham then active stimulation
Sham iTBS over the left M1 hand region, followed after 1 week washout period by active iTBS over the left M1 hand region
Active iTBS will be applied using a butterfly figure-of-eight C-B60 coil connected to MagPro R30 stimulator with add-on Theta Burst option (MagVenture A/S, Farum, Denmark).
Sham iTBS will be applied using acoustic stimulation of a second coil behind the participant's head

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor evoked potential (MEP)
Time Frame: Pre-iTBS (baseline) and post-iTBS at 5,10,20, and 30 minutes

Peak-to-peak MEP amplitude elicited by single-pulse TMS over the left M1 representation of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. In each MEP measurement throughout the study, a total of 12 MEP readings, elicited by single pulse TMS at an intensity of 120% resting motor threshold, and separated by 15 seconds, will be collected.

In each time point post-iTBS, the mean value of MEPs (aka, conditioned MEPs) will be averaged and compared to pre-iTBS (aka, baseline MEPs) using the following equation:

(conditioned MEP amplitude/baseline MEP amplitude) × 100. A value of 90-110% represents no change, while values < 90% represent suppression, and > 110% represent facilitation of the M1 plasticity following iTBS.

Pre-iTBS (baseline) and post-iTBS at 5,10,20, and 30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TMSens_Q questionnaire
Time Frame: At the end of every session
Self-reported side effects using structured TMSens_Q questionnaire to evaluate the tolerability of iTBS
At the end of every session
Blood glucose
Time Frame: Pre-iTBS (baseline) and post-iTBS at 0 and 30 minutes
Capillary blood glucose using portable glucometer
Pre-iTBS (baseline) and post-iTBS at 0 and 30 minutes
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Pre-iTBS (baseline) and post-iTBS at 0 and 30 minutes
Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) using semi-automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer. Unit of measure: mmHg
Pre-iTBS (baseline) and post-iTBS at 0 and 30 minutes
Heart rate
Time Frame: Pre-iTBS (baseline) and post-iTBS at 0 and 30 minutes
Heart rate (bpm) using semi-automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer
Pre-iTBS (baseline) and post-iTBS at 0 and 30 minutes
Baseline corticospinal excitability indices
Time Frame: Baseline
Test-retest reliability of resting motor threshold (RMT) and MEP amplitude
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified raw datasets collected during the trial will be freely available upon completion on the Open Science Framework repository at https://osf.io/

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Young Adults

Clinical Trials on TMS

Subscribe