Ultrasonographic Parameters in Prediction of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Non-suspected Difficult Airway Patients

September 18, 2023 updated by: Ahmed Salah Eldein Shalaby Abotaleb, Tanta University

Use of Ultrasonographic Parameters in Preoperative Prediction of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Non-suspected Difficult Airway Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery; a Prospective Observational Study

This study aims to evaluate the ultrasonographic parameters (distance from skin to epiglottis (DSE) and distance from skin to vocal cords (DSVC)) as preoperative predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in non-suspected difficult airway patients undergoing elective surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Airway management is an integral part of general anesthesia. It simply aims to secure the patient's airway and achieve adequate ventilation and oxygenation for the patient undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Unsuccessful airway management due to the unexpected difficulty in laryngoscopy is a life-threatening situation and may lead to morbidity and mortality.

Many conventional clinical tests are used in preoperative airway assessment such as modified Mallampati classification, Thyro-mental distance, inter-incisor distance, cervical mobility, and neck circumference, which are used to predict difficulty in the airway, but they have limited value and low sensitivity and specificity. Difficult laryngoscopy cannot be always predicted based on the preoperative assessment by conventional clinical tests. Some patients are thought to have an easy airway by clinical tests, but they show an unexpected difficulty in the laryngoscopy.

The laryngeal view of the patient can be assessed and graded during direct laryngoscopy using the Cormack and Lehane grading scale and its modification that describes the laryngoscopy as easy or difficult.

Ultrasonography is a valuable promising tool for preoperative airway evaluation through identifying important sonoanatomy of the upper airway such as epiglottis, thyroid cartilage, and vocal cords.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • El-Gharbia
      • Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt, 31527
        • Tanta University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This retrospective observational study will be carried out on 85 patients at Tanta University Hospital in the anesthesia department over a period of one year from May 2022 to May 2023, which may be extended after approval from the institutional ethical committee of the faculty of medicine at Tanta University.

Laryngeal view grading according to the modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale where grades 1 and 2a are considered easy laryngoscopy and grades 2b, 3, and 4 are considered difficult laryngoscopy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 - 65 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • Patients who aren't suspected to have a difficult airway after preoperative airway assessment by conventional clinical tests such as modified Mallampati classification (MMC), thyromental distance (TMD), inter-incisor distance (IID), cervical mobility (CM), And neck circumference (NC).
  • American society of anesthesia (ASA) I, II, and III physical status.
  • Scheduled for elective surgery under general anaethesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with maxillofacial injury and airway trauma.
  • Patients with a history of previous difficult intubation.
  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities.
  • Neck scarring, swelling, or burn.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Obesity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Easy laryngoscopy
Laryngeal view grading according to the modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale where grades 1 and 2a are considered easy laryngoscopy and grades 2b, 3, and 4 are considered difficult laryngoscopy.
Ultrasonographic parameters: in the parasagittal plane (1cm from midline) with the patient lying supine, without a pillow, head, and neck in the neutral position, looking straight ahead with mouth closed and the tongue on the floor of the mouth without any movement.
Difficult laryngoscopy
Laryngeal view grading according to the modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale where grades 1 and 2a are considered easy laryngoscopy and grades 2b, 3, and 4 are considered difficult laryngoscopy.
Ultrasonographic parameters: in the parasagittal plane (1cm from midline) with the patient lying supine, without a pillow, head, and neck in the neutral position, looking straight ahead with mouth closed and the tongue on the floor of the mouth without any movement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between the ultrasonographic parameters and the modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes during intubation.
Correlation between the ultrasonographic parameters (distance from skin to epiglottis ( DSE) and distance from skin to vocal cords (DSVC)) and the modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale of laryngoscopy as easy or difficult
10 minutes during intubation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of ultrasonographic distance from skin to epiglottis to predict difficult laryngoscopy.
Time Frame: 10 minutes during intubation.

Measurement of Sensitivity of ultrasonographic distance from skin to epiglottis to predict difficult laryngoscopy.

Laryngeal view grading according to the modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale where grades 1 and 2a are considered easy laryngoscopy and grades 2b, 3, and 4 are considered difficult laryngoscopy.

10 minutes during intubation.
Sensitivity of ultrasonographic distance from skin to vocal cords to easy laryngoscopy.
Time Frame: 10 minutes during intubation.

Measurement of Sensitivity of ultrasonographic distance from skin to epiglottis to predict easy laryngoscopy.

Laryngeal view grading according to the modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale where grades 1 and 2a are considered easy laryngoscopy and grades 2b, 3, and 4 are considered difficult laryngoscopy.

10 minutes during intubation.
Specificity of ultrasonographic distance from skin to epiglottis to predict difficult laryngoscopy.
Time Frame: 10 minutes during intubation.

Measurement of Specificity of ultrasonographic distance from skin to epiglottis to predict difficult laryngoscopy.

Laryngeal view grading according to the modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale where grades 1 and 2a are considered easy laryngoscopy and grades 2b, 3, and 4 are considered difficult laryngoscopy.

10 minutes during intubation.
Specificity of ultrasonographic distance from skin to vocal cords to easy laryngoscopy.
Time Frame: 10 minutes during intubation.

Measurement of Specificity of ultrasonographic distance from skin to epiglottis to predict easy laryngoscopy.

Laryngeal view grading according to the modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale where grades 1 and 2a are considered easy laryngoscopy and grades 2b, 3, and 4 are considered difficult laryngoscopy.

10 minutes during intubation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 35566/6/22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of the study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of the study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound

Subscribe