Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression

Effects of Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Depression is among the most prevalent psychiatric disorders, with an upward trend in its manifestation in younger individuals. In contrast to adult depression, adolescent depression often presents with longer attack durations, higher recurrence rates, chronicity, and elevated disability rates. At present, treatment options for adolescent depression encompass pharmacological, physical, and psychological therapies. However, current evidence suggests that no antidepressant medication is entirely safe for youths, with only fluoxetine and escitalopram being FDA-approved for treating adolescent depression.

Given the weight of interpersonal stressors faced by teenagers, the NICE guidelines recommend interpersonal therapy(IPT) as a first-line treatment. A 2020 meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry reported that interpersonal therapy exhibited significantly greater improvements in depression symptoms than cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT), although psychotherapeutic effects were modest, achieving a remission rate of 60%. These results underscore the need for further research to enhance interpersonal therapy's effectiveness in treating adolescent depression.

High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS)is a highly secure non-invasive brain stimulation technique that produces sustained effects even after stimulation has discontinued, rendering it particularly valuable for therapeutic interventions. The proposed study aims to augment a single IPT treatment with HD-tDCS stimulation for adolescent depression. By enhancing the excitability of the cerebral cortex, HD-tDCS could potentially enhance IPT's therapeutic efficacy in treating adolescent depression while facilitating further investigation of its underlying neural circuit mechanisms.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Sign a written informed consent form, willing to participate in the study and accept treatment (patients under 18 years of age need to obtain the consent of their parents or legal guardians);
  2. Age between 12 and 18 years;
  3. Right-handed;
  4. Han ethnicity;
  5. Meet the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for depression;
  6. HAMD-24≥20;
  7. Understand written language and able to complete questionnaires;
  8. First-episode depression patients who have never received any treatment or relapse depression patients, have not taken any psychotropic drugs in the past 2 weeks, have not received systematic psychological or physical therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Exclusion criteria for tDCS: (1) Patients with metal implants in the body; those with metal implants such as titanium or magnetic devices (including aneurysm clips); (2) Patients with implanted devices such as cardiac pacemakers, deep brain stimulators (DBS); (3) Patients with intracranial hypertension, skull defects, or tumors; (4) Patients with unstable vital signs such as severe cardiac or somatic diseases; (5) Patients in the acute phase of cerebrovascular diseases; (6) Patients with adverse reactions to electrical stimulation; (7) Patients with pain sensitivity, injury, or inflammation in the stimulation area.
  2. Exclusion criteria for MRI;
  3. Patients with severe neurological, cardiac, liver, kidney, endocrine, and blood system diseases, or any other condition that may interfere with the study evaluation;
  4. Patients with organic mental disorders and mental retardation;
  5. Patients with alcohol or drug dependence;
  6. Patients with a high risk of suicide.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IPT plus HD-tDCS
psychotherapy plus device
Sham Comparator: IPT plus sham HD-tDCS
psychotherapy plus sham device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
Baseline
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1-month
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
1-month
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: 2-month
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
2-month
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: 3-month
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
3-month
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
Baseline
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Time Frame: 1-month
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
1-month
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Time Frame: 2-month
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
2-month
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Time Frame: 3-month
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
3-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
Baseline
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1-month
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
1-month
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Time Frame: 2-month
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
2-month
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Time Frame: 3-month
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
3-month
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Baseline
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: 1-month
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
1-month
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: 2-month
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
2-month
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: 3-month
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
3-month
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
Baseline
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: 1-month
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
1-month
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: 2-month
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
2-month
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: 3-month
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
3-month
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Baseline
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Time Frame: 1-month
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
1-month
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Time Frame: 2-month
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
2-month
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Time Frame: 3-month
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
3-month
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Baseline
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1-month
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
1-month
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2-month
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
2-month
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3-month
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
3-month
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Time Frame: Baseline
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Baseline
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Time Frame: 1-month
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
1-month
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Time Frame: 2-month
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
2-month
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Time Frame: 3-month
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
3-month
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Time Frame: Baseline
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
Baseline
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Time Frame: 1-month
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
1-month
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Time Frame: 2-month
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
2-month
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Time Frame: 3-month
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
3-month
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Baseline
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1-month
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
1-month
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2-month
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
2-month
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3-month
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
3-month
IL-6 level
Time Frame: Baseline
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
Baseline
IL-6 level
Time Frame: 2-month
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
2-month
MRI data
Time Frame: Baseline
Reflecting brain structure and function
Baseline
MRI data
Time Frame: 2-month
Reflecting brain structure and function
2-month
EEG data
Time Frame: Baseline
Reflecting brain function. It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
Baseline
EEG data
Time Frame: 2-month
Reflecting brain function. It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
2-month
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Time Frame: Baseline
Reflecting cortical excitability. N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1). Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
Baseline
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Time Frame: 2-month
Reflecting cortical excitability. N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1). Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
2-month
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
Time Frame: Baseline
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers. The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function. The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
Baseline
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
Time Frame: 2-month
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers. The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function. The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
2-month
Perceptual judgment test
Time Frame: Baseline
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
Baseline
Perceptual judgment test
Time Frame: 2-month
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
2-month
Distance memory test
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of Working memory.
Baseline
Distance memory test
Time Frame: 2-month
Assessment of Working memory.
2-month
ERP experiment
Time Frame: Baseline
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded. Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.
Baseline
ERP experiment
Time Frame: 2-month
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded. Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.
2-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIT2023496

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on IPT plus HD-tDCS

Subscribe