- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06061653
Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression
Effects of Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Depression is among the most prevalent psychiatric disorders, with an upward trend in its manifestation in younger individuals. In contrast to adult depression, adolescent depression often presents with longer attack durations, higher recurrence rates, chronicity, and elevated disability rates. At present, treatment options for adolescent depression encompass pharmacological, physical, and psychological therapies. However, current evidence suggests that no antidepressant medication is entirely safe for youths, with only fluoxetine and escitalopram being FDA-approved for treating adolescent depression.
Given the weight of interpersonal stressors faced by teenagers, the NICE guidelines recommend interpersonal therapy(IPT) as a first-line treatment. A 2020 meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry reported that interpersonal therapy exhibited significantly greater improvements in depression symptoms than cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT), although psychotherapeutic effects were modest, achieving a remission rate of 60%. These results underscore the need for further research to enhance interpersonal therapy's effectiveness in treating adolescent depression.
High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS)is a highly secure non-invasive brain stimulation technique that produces sustained effects even after stimulation has discontinued, rendering it particularly valuable for therapeutic interventions. The proposed study aims to augment a single IPT treatment with HD-tDCS stimulation for adolescent depression. By enhancing the excitability of the cerebral cortex, HD-tDCS could potentially enhance IPT's therapeutic efficacy in treating adolescent depression while facilitating further investigation of its underlying neural circuit mechanisms.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Manli Huang, M.D
- Phone Number: 86 13957162975
- Email: huangmanli@zju.edu.cn
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Xiaoyi Zhou
- Phone Number: 86 15158866089
- Email: zhouxiaoyi@zju.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
- Recruiting
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
-
Contact:
- Huang Manli
- Phone Number: 13957162975
- Email: huangmanli@zju.edu.cn
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sign a written informed consent form, willing to participate in the study and accept treatment (patients under 18 years of age need to obtain the consent of their parents or legal guardians);
- Age between 12 and 18 years;
- Right-handed;
- Han ethnicity;
- Meet the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for depression;
- HAMD-24≥20;
- Understand written language and able to complete questionnaires;
- First-episode depression patients who have never received any treatment or relapse depression patients, have not taken any psychotropic drugs in the past 2 weeks, have not received systematic psychological or physical therapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Exclusion criteria for tDCS: (1) Patients with metal implants in the body; those with metal implants such as titanium or magnetic devices (including aneurysm clips); (2) Patients with implanted devices such as cardiac pacemakers, deep brain stimulators (DBS); (3) Patients with intracranial hypertension, skull defects, or tumors; (4) Patients with unstable vital signs such as severe cardiac or somatic diseases; (5) Patients in the acute phase of cerebrovascular diseases; (6) Patients with adverse reactions to electrical stimulation; (7) Patients with pain sensitivity, injury, or inflammation in the stimulation area.
- Exclusion criteria for MRI;
- Patients with severe neurological, cardiac, liver, kidney, endocrine, and blood system diseases, or any other condition that may interfere with the study evaluation;
- Patients with organic mental disorders and mental retardation;
- Patients with alcohol or drug dependence;
- Patients with a high risk of suicide.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: IPT plus HD-tDCS
|
psychotherapy plus device
|
|
Sham Comparator: IPT plus sham HD-tDCS
|
psychotherapy plus sham device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
|
Baseline
|
|
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1-month
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
|
1-month
|
|
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
|
2-month
|
|
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: 3-month
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
|
3-month
|
|
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
|
Baseline
|
|
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Time Frame: 1-month
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
|
1-month
|
|
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
|
2-month
|
|
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Time Frame: 3-month
|
Assessment of depressive symptoms.
Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
|
3-month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
|
Baseline
|
|
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1-month
|
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
|
1-month
|
|
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
|
2-month
|
|
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Time Frame: 3-month
|
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
|
3-month
|
|
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of suicidal ideation.
The test taker first completes the initial five questions.
If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes.
Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation.
The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100.
A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
|
Baseline
|
|
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: 1-month
|
Assessment of suicidal ideation.
The test taker first completes the initial five questions.
If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes.
Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation.
The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100.
A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
|
1-month
|
|
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Assessment of suicidal ideation.
The test taker first completes the initial five questions.
If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes.
Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation.
The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100.
A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
|
2-month
|
|
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: 3-month
|
Assessment of suicidal ideation.
The test taker first completes the initial five questions.
If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes.
Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation.
The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100.
A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
|
3-month
|
|
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score.
The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
|
Baseline
|
|
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: 1-month
|
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score.
The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
|
1-month
|
|
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: 2-month
|
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score.
The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
|
2-month
|
|
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: 3-month
|
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score.
The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
|
3-month
|
|
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
|
Baseline
|
|
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Time Frame: 1-month
|
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
|
1-month
|
|
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Time Frame: 2-month
|
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
|
2-month
|
|
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Time Frame: 3-month
|
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
|
3-month
|
|
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points.
The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
|
Baseline
|
|
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1-month
|
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points.
The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
|
1-month
|
|
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2-month
|
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points.
The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
|
2-month
|
|
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3-month
|
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points.
The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
|
3-month
|
|
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Time Frame: Baseline
|
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
|
Baseline
|
|
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Time Frame: 1-month
|
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
|
1-month
|
|
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Time Frame: 2-month
|
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
|
2-month
|
|
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Time Frame: 3-month
|
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
|
3-month
|
|
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
|
Baseline
|
|
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Time Frame: 1-month
|
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
|
1-month
|
|
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
|
2-month
|
|
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Time Frame: 3-month
|
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
|
3-month
|
|
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
|
Baseline
|
|
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1-month
|
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
|
1-month
|
|
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
|
2-month
|
|
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3-month
|
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
|
3-month
|
|
IL-6 level
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry.
The normal value is 0-5.30
pg/ml.
There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
|
Baseline
|
|
IL-6 level
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry.
The normal value is 0-5.30
pg/ml.
There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
|
2-month
|
|
MRI data
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Reflecting brain structure and function
|
Baseline
|
|
MRI data
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Reflecting brain structure and function
|
2-month
|
|
EEG data
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Reflecting brain function.
It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
|
Baseline
|
|
EEG data
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Reflecting brain function.
It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
|
2-month
|
|
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Reflecting cortical excitability.
N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1).
Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
|
Baseline
|
|
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Reflecting cortical excitability.
N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1).
Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
|
2-month
|
|
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers.
The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function.
The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function.
The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
|
Baseline
|
|
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
Time Frame: 2-month
|
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers.
The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function.
The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function.
The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
|
2-month
|
|
Perceptual judgment test
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
|
Baseline
|
|
Perceptual judgment test
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
|
2-month
|
|
Distance memory test
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Assessment of Working memory.
|
Baseline
|
|
Distance memory test
Time Frame: 2-month
|
Assessment of Working memory.
|
2-month
|
|
ERP experiment
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded.
Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.
|
Baseline
|
|
ERP experiment
Time Frame: 2-month
|
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded.
Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.
|
2-month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIT2023496
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder
-
Aalborg University HospitalRecruitingDepressive Disorder | Depression | Depressive Episode | Depressive Disorders | Depressive Episodes | Depression - Major Depressive Disorder | Depressive Disorder, Major Depressive DisorderDenmark
-
Sheba Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.RecruitingACP-211 Monotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder With Inadequate Antidepressant Response (NORLIGHT)Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant | Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)United States
-
Rotman Research Institute at BaycrestRecruitingMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD)Canada
-
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteRecruitingDepression - Major Depressive Disorder | Depression Chronic | Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder | Depression DisorderSpain
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
First People's Hospital of HangzhouNot yet recruitingMajor Depressive Disorder
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
Shandong Provincial HospitalShandong UniversityRecruiting
-
Engrail Therapeutics INCCompletedMajor Depressive DisorderUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on IPT plus HD-tDCS
-
Shanghai Mental Health CenterChinese Academy of SciencesTerminated
-
Ariel UniversityTel Aviv UniversityCompleted
-
The University of Texas at DallasCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Deafness and Other...CompletedPrimary Progressive Aphasia | MCI | FTDUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); National Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedMajor Depressive DisorderUnited States
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedMild Cognitive Impairment | Dementia of Alzheimer TypeUnited States
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompleted
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of MichiganNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)TerminatedTemporomandibular DisorderUnited States
-
University of MichiganRecruitingPosterior Cortical AtrophyUnited States