Implementation of Support in the Care of Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes

September 22, 2025 updated by: Anne-Sophie Brazeau, McGill University

Using the Support Online Platform for Self-management Education of Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes as Part of Usual Care or Independently: an Implementation Study

The investigators will conduct a trial to evaluate if an online training and support platform can help adults living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in their diabetes self-management. Investigators will compare a group that has access to the "Support" platform through their usual medical care to a group that accesses the platform independently. The first group will be recruited through four participating clinics in the province of Quebec (Canada). The second group will be composed of adults living with T1D across Canada. Participants will have access to the platform for 12 months and will be asked to complete online questionnaires at the beginning and after 6 and 12 months, and share their glucose reader data with the research team. A subgroup of participants as well as healthcare professionals from the four clinics will be invited to participate in an individual interview aiming to understand the barriers and facilitators of integration "Support" in clinical care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic condition which requires life-sustaining insulin therapy as well as knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage. Tailored diabetes self-management education (DSME) should be offered to all people living with diabetes (PWT1D) at diagnosis, but also in a timely manner according to needs. DSME has the potential to improve quality of life and decrease diabetes complications. Despite the positive outcomes of other DSME programs, participation rates of DSME vary greatly perhaps because access remains sub-optimal. Also, healthcare professionals (HCPs) face a challenge to remain aware of the particularities of T1D and stay up-to-date on the rapidly evolving evidence-based knowledge, technologies and therapies available. The investigators propose to examine an online training and peer support platform, called "Support" as a potential alternative for DSME.

The overall purpose of this hybrid effectiveness-implementation study is to investigate if integrating the "Support" platform to routine medical care of adults living with T1D (i.e., diabetes team referring to the "Support" platform during appointments) can improve diabetes self- management, in comparison with navigating the "Support" platform independently of usual care (i.e., the platform not being discussed during appointment) (Effectiveness), and to study the factors affecting its implementation in real-life settings (Implementation).

This study is a mixed-method multi-site, 2 arms, non-randomized, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

ARM 1: PWT1D participants will have access to Support as part of their regular care (their HCPs will use "Support" in their care). PWT1D participants in ARM 1 are followed in one of the 4 participating clinics either in-person or remotely or hybrid.

ARM 2: PWT1D participants will have access to "Support", independently from their regular care (they may initiate discussion about the platform with their diabetes care team who might register themselves on the platform, but will not prompt to any specific section on the platform and will not receive any training about the platform). PWT1D participants in ARM 2 can be followed in any other clinics in Canada.

Implementation data will be gathered through HCP participants in the participating clinics.

Participants will have to answer online surveys at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. After completing the baseline questionnaire, they will receive an access to the platform. A subgroup of participants as well as participating HCPs will be invited for individual interviews to discuss their experience in using the platform.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

322

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2W 1R7
        • Recruiting
        • Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal
        • Contact:
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 0C1
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
        • Contact:
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1V 0E8
        • Recruiting
        • Centre hospitalier de Quebec, Université Laval
        • Contact:
      • Terrebonne, Quebec, Canada, J6X 4P7
        • Recruiting
        • Centre de Medecine Metabolique de Lanaudiere
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of T1D (including LADA - latent autoimmune diabetes in adults)
  • Have access to Internet
  • Use of an active email address
  • Comprehension of English or French
  • Live in Canada

Exclusion Criteria:

- Unable to use the Support platform

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Support integrated in usual care
PWT1D participants will have access to Support as part of their regular care (their HCPs will use Support in their care). PWT1D participants in ARM 1 are followed in one of the 4 participating clinics either in-person or remotely or hybrid.

The study will be conducted over a 12-month period. This should allow participants to see their medical team 2 to 3 times during this timeframe. Participants of arms 1 and 2 will have access to the Support platform and will receive a monthly newsletter, informing them of news on the platform and acting as a reminder to log in. Several features are included in this responsive-designed platform to enhance participation, such as a visual of personal progress, ability to bookmark content, change their avatar.

Support contains 3 main components: Educational material, News blog written by HCPs weekly in collaboration with patient-partners on up-to-date topics related to T1D, a peer-to-peer discussion forum which is moderated daily by a HCP specializing in T1D.

Active Comparator: Support through independent access
PWT1D participants will have access to Support, independently from their regular care (they may initiate discussion about the platform with their diabetes care team who might register themselves on the platform, but will not prompt to any specific section on the platform and will not receive any training about the platform). PWT1D participants in ARM 2 can be followed in any other clinics in Canada.

The study will be conducted over a 12-month period. This should allow participants to see their medical team 2 to 3 times during this timeframe. Participants of arms 1 and 2 will have access to the Support platform and will receive a monthly newsletter, informing them of news on the platform and acting as a reminder to log in. Several features are included in this responsive-designed platform to enhance participation, such as a visual of personal progress, ability to bookmark content, change their avatar.

Support contains 3 main components: Educational material, News blog written by HCPs weekly in collaboration with patient-partners on up-to-date topics related to T1D, a peer-to-peer discussion forum which is moderated daily by a HCP specializing in T1D.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy for diabetes management
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire-Revised (DSMQ-R; 27-items, score on 10)
0, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Well-being
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
WHO-5 well-being index
0, 6 and 12 months
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) - % Time in range
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
% Time in range (3.9-10.0mmol/L) over the past 4 weeks. Participants may share their account access so the research team will be able to export data or may upload a PDF of their data through REDCap.
0, 6 and 12 months
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) - % Time above range
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
% Time above range (3.9-10.0mmol/L) over the past 4 weeks. Participants may share their account access so the research team will be able to export data or may upload a PDF of their data through REDCap.
0, 6 and 12 months
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) - % Time below range
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
% Time below range (3.9-10.0mmol/L) over the past 4 weeks. Participants may share their account access so the research team will be able to export data or may upload a PDF of their data through REDCap.
0, 6 and 12 months
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) - Standard deviation
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Standard deviation of the past 4 weeks. Participants may share their account access so the research team will be able to export data or may upload a PDF of their data through REDCap.
0, 6 and 12 months
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) - % Coefficient of variation
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
% Coefficient of variation of the past 4 weeks. Participants may share their account access so the research team will be able to export data or may upload a PDF of their data through REDCap.
0, 6 and 12 months
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
self-reported last Hemoglobin A1c (date and value) through online questionnaire
0, 6 and 12 months
Severe hypoglycemic events
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Self-reported severe hypoglycemic events in the past 6 months
0, 6 and 12 months
Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) events
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Self-reported DKA events in the past 6 months
0, 6 and 12 months
calls to 911
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Self-reported number of calls to 911 in the past 6 months
0, 6 and 12 months
calls to 811
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Self-reported number of calls to 811 in the past 6 months
0, 6 and 12 months
Cost effectiveness (self-efficacy)
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Cost effectiveness of access to Support as part of usual care compared with independent access in terms of incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for self-efficacy
6 and 12 months
Cost effectiveness (HbA1c)
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Cost effectiveness of access to Support as part of usual care compared with independent access in terms of incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for HbA1c
6 and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation question
Time Frame: 0 month
Participants will be asked where they heard about the platform.
0 month
communication with health care team
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Question about type (in-person, phone, video call or email) and frequency of communication with health care team
0, 6 and 12 months
Engagement with Support platform (T1D patient) - time in minutes on platform
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Engagement metrics will be extracted using Google analytics - time (minutes) spent on the platform
6, 12 months
Engagement with Support platform (T1D patient) - total pages viewed
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Engagement metrics will be extracted using Google analytics - total pages viewed from the platform
6, 12 months
Engagement with Support platform (T1D patient) - downloaded documents
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Engagement metrics will be extracted using Google analytics - downloaded documents from the platform
6, 12 months
Engagement with Support platform (T1D patient) - use of calculators
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Engagement metrics will be extracted using Google analytics - use of calculators on the platform
6, 12 months
Engagement with Support platform (Health Care Provider) - time in minutes on platform
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Engagement metrics will be extracted using Google analytics - time (minutes) spent on the platform
6, 12 months
Engagement with Support platform (Health Care Provider) - content accessed
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Engagement metrics will be extracted using Google analytics - specific content accessed from the platform
6, 12 months
Engagement with Support platform (Health Care Provider) - total pages viewed
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Engagement metrics will be extracted using Google analytics - total pages viewed from the platform
6, 12 months
Engagement with Support platform (Health Care Provider) - downloaded documents
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Engagement metrics will be extracted using Google analytics - downloaded documents from the platform
6, 12 months
Engagement with Support platform (Health Care Provider) - use of calculators
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Engagement metrics will be extracted using Google analytics - use of calculators on the platform
6, 12 months
Satisfaction with Support-t platform - T1D patient
Time Frame: 6, 12 months
Satisfaction will be rated on a scale from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the platform.
6, 12 months
Experience with Support platform (Barriers, facilitators, satisfaction, fidelity) - T1D patient
Time Frame: 12 months
Individual interviews to understand the experience in the context of implementation of the Support-t platform (Barriers, facilitators, satisfaction, fidelity) using qualitative descriptive methodology
12 months
Experience with Support platform (Barriers, facilitators, satisfaction, fidelity) - Health Care Provider
Time Frame: 12 months
Individual interviews to understand the experience in the context of implementation of the Support-t platform (Barriers, facilitators, satisfaction, fidelity) using qualitative descriptive methodology
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 5, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Immune System Diseases

Clinical Trials on Support platform

Subscribe