- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06072339
Optimization of Positive End Expiratory Pressure by Use of Pulmonary Ultrasound for Patients With Blunt Chest Trauma Treated by Non-Invasive Ventilation (Opti-PEP). (Opti-PEP)
Optimization of Positive End Expiratory Pressure by Use of Pulmonary Ultrasound for Patients With Blunt Chest Trauma Treated by Non-Invasive Ventilation : Randomized Controlled Study (Opti-PEP).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This is an open-label, randomized controlled study comparing two non-invasive ventilation initiation strategies. Patients may be included if they are admitted to intensive care unit or continuing care unit and present with acute respiratory failure related to blunt chest trauma. We will not include patients with another indication for non-invasive ventilation, immediately needing invasive ventilation, a contraindication to non invasive ventilation or an estimated length of stay less than or equal to 48 hours.
Both groups will be treated with non-ivasive ventilation according to the medical prescription. The intervention group will benefit from the use by the physiotherapist of pulmonary ultrasound for the adjustment of PEEP during the 1st session. The conventional group will benefit from the non-invasive ventilation according to the usual care. The other non-invasive ventilation settings will be chosen with the same method in both groups.
The main endpoint will be the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (Arterial oxygen pressure / inspired fraction of oxygen) after 30 min of non-invasive ventilation treatment. This ratio is the best reflection of the patient oxygenation and currently used for respiratory therapies studies.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Montpellier
-
Montpellier, Montpellier, France, 34295
- UH of Montpellier
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 or more
- Admitted to intensive care or continuing care for 72 hours or less for blunt chest trauma, defined by the presence of at least one of the following elements on the initial CT scan: fracture(s) of rib(s) / fracture(s) of the sternum / pulmonary contusion / hemothorax
- Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure defined by the administration of oxygen at least 3 L/min with nasal cannula or FiO2≥30% if high flow oxygen therapy.
- Patient with a functional arterial catheter for blood tests
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute respiratory distress, defined by the presence of at least one of the following clinical signs: respiratory rate ˃ 35 / use of accessory inspirators / paradoxal abdominal or thoracic motion
- Imminent need for invasive mechanical ventilation
- Usual contraindication to non-invasive ventilation (undrained pneumothorax, trauma to the face, vigilance disorders, digestive bleeding, hemodynamic instability, intolerance)
- Hypercapnia (PaCO2˃45mmHg)
- Patient unable to cooperate, communicate
- Therapeutic limitation
- Expected length of stay ≤ 48h
- Severe head trauma
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Participation in other clinical research related to respiratory failure/respiratory therapy
- Vulnerable people
- Protected adults, under guardianship or curatorship, or unable to give consent
- Non-affiliated person or beneficiary of a social security scheme
- Absence of free, informed and written consent, signed by the participant and the investigator
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental
The intervention group will benefit from the physiotherapist's use of lung ultrasound for the PEEP adjustment during the first NIV session.
|
NIV is started and adjusted by the physiotherapist.
For the adjustment of PEEP, the ultrasound probe is placed on the thorax, facing the intercostal space having obtained the highest score during the initial LUS (synonym of the worst pulmonary aeration) and the images observed in real time.
PEEP is increased until the physiotherapist cannot see any additional benefit on pulmonary aeration or appearance of a patient discomfort or an increasing of air leaks.
The session will be done via a mouthpiece preferably, or a face mask if it is impossible for the patient to close their mouth properly or to hold the mouthpiece. The duration of the NIV session will be defined by the prescribing doctor (usually between 30 and 60 minutes), without being able to be less than 30 minutes. The session will be stopped in the event of the appearance of one of the contraindications to NIV mentioned above.
Arterial blood gas will be done at inclusion, at Visit 1 (at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session) and at Visit 2 (at the 60th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session) in both groups of patients in order to calculate the Pa02/Fi02 ratio.
The investigator physiotherapist interviews the participant to measure pain and comfort scores using a visual analogue scale (score from 0 to 10).
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
The conventional group will benefit from the NIV under the current terms.
|
The session will be done via a mouthpiece preferably, or a face mask if it is impossible for the patient to close their mouth properly or to hold the mouthpiece. The duration of the NIV session will be defined by the prescribing doctor (usually between 30 and 60 minutes), without being able to be less than 30 minutes. The session will be stopped in the event of the appearance of one of the contraindications to NIV mentioned above.
Arterial blood gas will be done at inclusion, at Visit 1 (at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session) and at Visit 2 (at the 60th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session) in both groups of patients in order to calculate the Pa02/Fi02 ratio.
The investigator physiotherapist interviews the participant to measure pain and comfort scores using a visual analogue scale (score from 0 to 10).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio (Arterial oxygen pressure / inspired oxygen fraction) in both groups
Time Frame: at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio (Arterial oxygen pressure / inspired oxygen fraction) in both groups. This PaO2/FiO2 ratio is now the benchmark for qualifying the severity of the respiratory impairment or measuring the response to a mechanical ventilation strategy aimed at improving oxygenation. |
at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparaison of the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) in both groups
Time Frame: at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
Comparaison of the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) in both groups. The LUS ranges from 0 to 36. Rib cage is divided into 12 areas (6 for each side) and each area is assessed according to the following scale: 0: Normal aeration corresponding to presence of lung sliding with A lines or fewer than two isolated B lines
|
at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
|
Comparaison of the PEEP value set at the start of the non-invasive ventilation session
Time Frame: At the start of the non-invasive ventilation session
|
Comparaison of the PEEP value set (in cmH2O) in both groups
|
At the start of the non-invasive ventilation session
|
|
Comparaison of the confort value in both groups
Time Frame: at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
Comparaison of the confort value in both groups using the Confort Visual Analog scale (from 0 to 10)
|
at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
|
Comparaison of the pain value in both groups
Time Frame: at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
Comparaison of the pain value in both groups using the Pain Visual Analog scale (from 0 to 10)
|
at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
|
Comparaison of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in both groups
Time Frame: 1 hour after the end of the 1st non-invasive ventilation session
|
Comparaison of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in both groups
|
1 hour after the end of the 1st non-invasive ventilation session
|
|
Comparaison of the incidence rate of respiratory aggravation in the 2 groups
Time Frame: Until discharge from intensive care/continuous care or until maximum D7.
|
Comparaison of the incidence rate of respiratory aggravation in the 2 groups
|
Until discharge from intensive care/continuous care or until maximum D7.
|
|
Rate of patients included in the experimental group in whom the use of ultrasound during the initiation of non-invasive ventilation is possible
Time Frame: at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
Rate of patients included in the experimental group in whom the use of ultrasound during the initiation of NIV is possible
|
at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio in both groups in patients with pulmonary consolidation
Time Frame: at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio in both groups in patients with pulmonary consolidation
|
at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio in both groups in patients with pleural effusion
Time Frame: at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the 2 groups in patients with pleural effusion
|
at the 30th minute from the start of the 1st Non-invasive ventilation session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Wounds and Injuries
- Thoracic Injuries
- Investigative Techniques
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques
- Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System
- Respiratory Function Tests
- Blood Chemical Analysis
- Clinical Chemistry Tests
- methyl hydroxyethyl cellulose
- Blood Gas Analysis
Other Study ID Numbers
- RECHMPL22_0556
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Thoracic Injuries
-
University GhentCompletedThoracic InjuryBelgium
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Hospital de GranollersCompleted
-
Soroka University Medical CenterUnknownSurgery | Anesthesia | Thoracic Injury | Block
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...UnknownLung Ultrasound Score | Blunt Thoracic Injury
-
Antalya Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
University of Cape TownMedical Research Council, South AfricaCompletedHeart InjuriesSouth Africa
-
Cook Research IncorporatedCompletedThoracic Injuries | Thoracic Aorta | Blunt InjuriesUnited States
-
University Hospital, LilleCompleted
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedThoracic InjuriesUnited States
Clinical Trials on Lung Ultrasound for PEEP setting
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingPediatric Patients | Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery | Ultrasound Guided Recruitment Manauvere | End Expiratory PressureEgypt
-
Osaka UniversityUnknownCritical IllnessJapan
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRecruitingICU Patients | ARDS | Healthy Lung | Positive End-Expiratory Pressure | Alveolar Recruitment ManeuverFrance
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalRecruiting
-
Konya City HospitalCompletedPEEP by Lung Ultrasound | PEEP With Dynamic ComplianceTurkey
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompletedARDS Due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2France
-
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileNot yet recruiting
-
Peking University People's HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityJinling Hospital, ChinaUnknownARDS | Intra-abdominal HypertensionSwitzerland
-
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São PauloCompletedHypertension | Atelectasis | Lung Edema