- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06075004
Total Periarticular Infiltration Vs Posterior Periarticular Infiltration Plus PENG Block for Hip Analgesia
A Randomized Comparison Between Total Periarticular Anesthetic Infiltration and Partial Posterior Periarticular Anesthetic Infiltration Plus Low Volume Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Total Hip Replacement Analgesia
In a recent study, direct periarticular local anesthetic infiltration (PAI) showed a greater incidence of early quadriceps weakness (33% at 3 hours and 13% at 6 hours) than pericapsular nerve group block (PENGB) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) but, in turn, demonstrated a statistically significant better pain control. Additionally, PENGB could not completely circumvent motor compromise either, particularly at 3 hours (20% incidence), probably secondary to an injectate migration towards the femoral nerve. Posteriorly to this publication, a cadaveric trial looking into the maximum effective volume that spared the femoral nerve resulted in 13.2 mL.
This newer evidence led to the design of a strategy that combines both interventions, aiming to obtain the best of them and have a solid alternative for those cases where very early mobilization is pursued.
Thus, it is hypothesized that posterior PAI added to a low-volume PENGB (10mL) represents a superior alternative to PAI in terms of strength preservation and provides effective analgesia during the first 24 postoperative hours after THA.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Patients who agree to participate in the protocol will be assigned to one group or another (PAI or posterior PAI+PENGB) through computationally generated block randomization. Outcome assessors blinded to randomization will perform all measurements.
All trial interventions (PAI or posterior PAI+PENGB) will be performed (or supervised) by one of the co-authors, an expert orthopedic surgeon anesthesiologist. Both interventions will be executed in the operating room, on the surgical table, under sedation, and with the barrier that separates the surgical field from the cranial area of the patient to keep the latter blind to the technique received.
All patients will undergo spinal anesthesia using 0.5% bupivacaine (10mg) plus 20 μg of fentanyl. Both groups will also receive tranexamic acid 1g intravenous (IV), ketoprofen 100mg IV, and acetaminophen 1gr IV. Propofol sedation guided with a targeted controlled infusion (TCI) model will be administered in order to obtain an adequate level of sedation.
All surgeries will be conducted by the same team of surgeons, performing a posterior approach technique in the lateral decubitus position.
In the recovery room, all patients will receive patient-controlled analgesia (morphine bolus = 1 mg; lockout interval = 8 minutes). On the surgical ward, all subjects will continue to receive acetaminophen (1 g per os every 6 hours), ketoprofen (100 mg per os every 8 hours) as well and patient-controlled analgesia (morphine bolus = 1 mg IV; lockout interval = 8 minutes).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Daniela Bravo, MD
- Phone Number: 569222878209
- Email: dbravoadvis@uchile.cl
Study Locations
-
-
Metropolitana
-
Santiago, Metropolitana, Chile, 8380456
- Recruiting
- Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
-
Contact:
- Daniela B Advis
- Phone Number: +56984276252
- Email: dbravoadvis@uchile.cl
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
- Body mass index between 20 and 35 (kg/m2)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Adults who are unable to give their own consent
- Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination)
- Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work-up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
- Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work-up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
- Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work-up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
- Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs) or morphine
- Pregnancy
- Prior surgery in the inguinal area corresponding surgical side
- Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration
60 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 5ug/mL epinephrine will be deposited under direct vision during surgery at the periarticular level before wound closure.
|
Sixty milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine + 5ug/mL epinephrine and ketorolac 30 mg will be deposited by the orthopedic surgeon at the periarticular level under direct vision during surgery.
Fascia, subcutaneous tissues, and skin will also be infiltrated with part of the solution before wound closure.
|
|
Experimental: Posterior Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration plus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block
45 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 5ug/mL epinephrine will be deposited under direct vision during surgery at the posterior periarticular level before wound closure. After wound closure, an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block of the hip will be performed using ten mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 5ug/mL epinephrine. |
Procedure: Posterior Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration plus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block
From a total of forty-five milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine + 5ug/mL epinephrine and ketorolac 30 mg, 15mL will be deposited by the orthopedic surgeon at the posterior periarticular level under direct vision during surgery. Fascia, subcutaneous tissues, and skin will also be infiltrated with part of the solution before wound closure with the remaining 30mL. After wound closure, an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block will be performed by an anesthesiologist by injecting 10mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 5ug/mL epinephrine in the plane between the iliac bone periosteum and the tendon of the iliopsoas muscle. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Presence of quadriceps motor block (defined as paralysis or paresis)
Time Frame: 3 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
Quadriceps motor function will be tested with the patient lying on the bed and with the hip joint at 45º and the knee at 90º.
The subject will be asked to extend the knee, first against gravity and then against resistance.
Quadriceps strength will be graded according to a 3-point scale: normal strength = 0 point (extension against resistance); paresis = 1 point (extension against gravity but not against resistance); and paralysis = 2 points (no extension).
|
3 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative opioid related side effects
Time Frame: 48 hours after PACU arrival
|
Presence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, respiratory depression.
|
48 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Postoperative morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after PACU arrival
|
Consumption of intravenous morphine (mg) registered by a patient-controlled analgesia device.
|
24 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Postoperative morphine consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours after PACU arrival
|
Consumption of intravenous morphine (mg) registered by a patient-controlled analgesia device.
|
48 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Time until first morphine demand
Time Frame: 48 hours after PACU arrival
|
Time (minutes) until first patient-controlled analgesia morphine demand.
|
48 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Inability to perform physiotherapy due to motor block
Time Frame: 6 hours after PACU arrival
|
Number of participants that cannot end the physiotherapy protocol programmed for the sixth hour after PACU arrival secondary to decreased strength in the operated limb.
|
6 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Inability to perform physiotherapy due to pain
Time Frame: 6 hours after PACU arrival
|
Number of participants that cannot end the physiotherapy protocol programmed for the sixth hour after PACU arrival secondary to pain in the operated limb.
|
6 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Readiness to discharge
Time Frame: 4 days after surgery
|
Days to be ready for discharge following physiotherapist criteria
|
4 days after surgery
|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
|
Length of hospital stay after surgery
|
7 days after surgery
|
|
Presence of quadriceps motor block (defined as paralysis or paresis)
Time Frame: 6 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
Quadriceps motor function will be tested with the patient lying on the bed and with the hip joint at 45º and the knee at 90º.
The subject will be asked to extend the knee, first against gravity and then against resistance.
Quadriceps strength will be graded according to a 3-point scale: normal strength = 0 point (extension against resistance); paresis = 1 point (extension against gravity but not against resistance); and paralysis = 2 points (no extension).
|
6 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
|
Presence of quadriceps motor block (defined as paralysis or paresis)
Time Frame: 24 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
Quadriceps motor function will be tested with the patient lying on the bed and with the hip joint at 45º and the knee at 90º.
The subject will be asked to extend the knee, first against gravity and then against resistance.
Quadriceps strength will be graded according to a 3-point scale: normal strength = 0 point (extension against resistance); paresis = 1 point (extension against gravity but not against resistance); and paralysis = 2 points (no extension).
|
24 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
|
Hip adduction strength
Time Frame: 3 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
Hip adduction will be evaluated by comparing it to baseline strength (i.e., prior to spinal anesthesia).
A blood pressure cuff, inflated at 40 mmHg, will be inserted between the knees of the patient: the latter will then be instructed to squeeze the cuff as hard as possible and to sustain the effort.
We will define hip adduction scores of 0, 1, and 2 points as decreases in strength of 0-20% (normal strength), 21-70% (paresis), and 71-90% (paralysis) compared to the baseline measurement, respectively.
|
3 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
|
Hip adduction strength
Time Frame: 6 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
Hip adduction will be evaluated by comparing it to baseline strength (i.e., prior to spinal anesthesia).
A blood pressure cuff, inflated at 40 mmHg, will be inserted between the knees of the patient: the latter will then be instructed to squeeze the cuff as hard as possible and to sustain the effort.
We will define hip adduction scores of 0, 1, and 2 points as decreases in strength of 0-20% (normal strength), 21-70% (paresis), and 71-90% (paralysis) compared to the baseline measurement, respectively.
|
6 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
|
Hip adduction strength
Time Frame: 24 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
Hip adduction will be evaluated by comparing it to baseline strength (i.e., prior to spinal anesthesia).
A blood pressure cuff, inflated at 40 mmHg, will be inserted between the knees of the patient: the latter will then be instructed to squeeze the cuff as hard as possible and to sustain the effort.
We will define hip adduction scores of 0, 1, and 2 points as decreases in strength of 0-20% (normal strength), 21-70% (paresis), and 71-90% (paralysis) compared to the baseline measurement, respectively.
|
24 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival
|
|
Static and dynamic pain
Time Frame: 3 hours after PACU arrival
|
Pain intensity at rest and during active movement (hip adduction) using a numeric rating score (NRS) ranged from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain).
|
3 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Static and dynamic pain
Time Frame: 6 hours after PACU arrival
|
Pain intensity at rest and during active movement (hip adduction) using a numeric rating score (NRS) ranged from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain).
|
6 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Static and dynamic pain
Time Frame: 12 hours after PACU arrival
|
Pain intensity at rest and during active movement (hip adduction) using a numeric rating score (NRS) ranged from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain).
|
12 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Static and dynamic pain
Time Frame: 18 hours after PACU arrival
|
Pain intensity at rest and during active movement (hip adduction) using a numeric rating score (NRS) ranged from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain).
|
18 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Static and dynamic pain
Time Frame: 24 hours after PACU arrival
|
Pain intensity at rest and during active movement (hip adduction) using a numeric rating score (NRS) ranged from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain).
|
24 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Static and dynamic pain
Time Frame: 48 hours after PACU arrival
|
Pain intensity at rest and during active movement (hip adduction) using a numeric rating score (NRS) ranged from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain).
|
48 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Sensory block
Time Frame: 3 hours after PACU arrival
|
Sensory block in the anterior, lateral and medial aspects of the mid-thigh.
For each territory, blockade will be evaluated using a 3-point scale: 0 = no block, 1 = analgesia (patient can feel touch, not cold), 2 = anesthesia (patient cannot feel touch).
|
3 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Sensory block
Time Frame: 6 hours after PACU arrival
|
Sensory block in the anterior, lateral and medial aspects of the mid-thigh.
For each territory, blockade will be evaluated using a 3-point scale: 0 = no block, 1 = analgesia (patient can feel touch, not cold), 2 = anesthesia (patient cannot feel touch).
|
6 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Sensory block
Time Frame: 24 hours after PACU arrival
|
Sensory block in the anterior, lateral and medial aspects of the mid-thigh.
For each territory, blockade will be evaluated using a 3-point scale: 0 = no block, 1 = analgesia (patient can feel touch, not cold), 2 = anesthesia (patient cannot feel touch).
|
24 hours after PACU arrival
|
|
Block/Infiltration-related complications
Time Frame: 1 hour after nerve block or local anesthetic infiltration
|
Incidence of adverse events related to nerve block or local anesthetic infiltration (i.e.
vascular puncture, local anesthetic systemic toxicity).
|
1 hour after nerve block or local anesthetic infiltration
|
|
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: 4 hours after skin incision
|
Time between skin incision and closure (min).
|
4 hours after skin incision
|
|
Inability to perform physiotherapy due to motor block
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1
|
Number of participants that cannot end the physiotherapy protocol programmed for the sixth hour after PACU arrival secondary to decreased strength in the operated limb.
|
Postoperative day 1
|
|
Inability to perform physiotherapy due to motor block
Time Frame: Postoperative day 2
|
Number of participants that cannot end the physiotherapy protocol programmed for the sixth hour after PACU arrival secondary to decreased strength in the operated limb.
|
Postoperative day 2
|
|
Inability to perform physiotherapy due to pain
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1
|
Number of participants that cannot end the physiotherapy protocol programmed for the sixth hour after PACU arrival secondary to pain in the operated limb.
|
Postoperative day 1
|
|
Inability to perform physiotherapy due to pain
Time Frame: Postoperative day 2
|
Number of participants that cannot end the physiotherapy protocol programmed for the sixth hour after PACU arrival secondary to pain in the operated limb.
|
Postoperative day 2
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniela Bravo, MD, University of Chile
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
- Wainwright TW, Gill M, McDonald DA, Middleton RG, Reed M, Sahota O, Yates P, Ljungqvist O. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):3-19. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
- Giron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.
- Kuchalik J, Magnuson A, Lundin A, Gupta A. Local infiltration analgesia or femoral nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, double-blind study. Scand J Pain. 2017 Jul;16:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
- Bravo D, Aliste J, Layera S, Fernandez D, Erpel H, Aguilera G, Arancibia H, Barrientos C, Wulf R, Leon S, Branes J, Finlayson RJ, Tran Q. Randomized clinical trial comparing pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and periarticular local anesthetic infiltration for total hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Oct;48(10):520-521. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104487. Epub 2023 Mar 22. No abstract available.
- Leurcharusmee P, Kantakam P, Intasuwan P, Malatong Y, Maikong N, Navic P, Kitcharanant N, Mahakkanukrauh P, Tran Q. Cadaveric study investigating the femoral nerve-sparing volume for pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Nov;48(11):549-552. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104419. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- OAIC 1379/23
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain Management | Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedics
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain ManagementMalaysia
-
Maimonides Medical CenterCompletedPOSTOPERATIVE PAINUnited States
-
University Hospital, AntwerpUnknown
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Thoracotomy | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicTurkey
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruitingPostoperative Pain ManagementTurkey
-
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, IncCompletedPostoperative Pain ManagementUnited States
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain Relief
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain ManagementTurkey
Clinical Trials on Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesNot yet recruitingHip Osteoarthritis | Arthropathy of HipPoland
-
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Cholecystitis | CholelithiasesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...Active, not recruitingIntraoperative Bleeding in Lumbar Spine Surgery | Postoperative Pain in Lumbar Spine SurgerySpain
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUnknown
-
Landeskrankenhaus FeldbachMedical University of GrazUnknown
-
University of Warmia and Mazury in OlsztynCompletedPain, Postoperative | Anesthesia, Local | Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic | Cholelithiasis | Nerve BlockPoland
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedQuadratus Lumborum Block | Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block | Local Anesthetic Infiltration | Lumbar Spine FixationEgypt
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptRecruitingInguinal Lymph Nodes EnlargedEgypt
-
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training...CompletedPostoperative Pain | Vascular Access DeviceTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of SaskatchewanCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome | Carpal TunnelCanada