- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06085196
Mindful Walking Program for Older African Americans
October 12, 2023 updated by: Chih-Hsiang Yang, University of South Carolina
Evaluation of an Outdoor Mindful Walking Program for Sustaining Cognitive Function in Older African Americans at Risk for Dementia
The goal of this clinical trial is to understand the beneficial role of mindful walking in sustaining cognitive health in African American older adults who have elevated risk of developing neuropsychological diseases.
The main question it aims to answer is "Does a multi-session mindful walking intervention lead to promising signals of sustaining cognitive health in vulnerable AA older adults?"
The researchers in this 2-arm randomized controlled trial will compare the mindful walking group with a delayed mindful walking to see if the intervention efficacy is observed at multiple follow-up period.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
African American (AA) older adults in the U.S. are disproportionally impacted by ADRD compared to other races and ethnicities.
Mindful walking integrates two potentially protective factors of ADRD by elevating mindfulness and physical activity (i.e., walking), resulting in a synergistic behavioral strategy that is feasible and safe for older adults.
However, the efficacy of using this intervention for cognitive health outcomes has not been tested using experimental designs.
This study is a community-based, mindful walking randomized controlled trial to examine its efficacy on cognitive and other health outcomes in ADRD at-risk, AA older adults.
This study will recruit 114 older adults (ages 60+ years) with elevated risk of developing ADRD from the Midlands region of South Carolina.
Older adults were randomly assigned to participate in 24 sessions of mindful walking or a delayed mindful walking group (n=57 in each group).
The study outcomes include various key brain health determinants, including cognitive function, quality of life, psychological well-being, physical activity, mindfulness, sleep, and overall health status.
Participants in both groups follow identical measurement protocol of at baseline, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, and 24 weeks.
The outcome measures are administered in the lab and in everyday settings.
This study will generate preliminary evidence regarding the effects of mindful walking on sustaining cognition health.
It will also inform future large-scale effectiveness trials to validate our study findings.
If successful, this mindful walking program can be scaled up as a low-cost and viable lifestyle strategy to promote healthy cognitive aging in diverse older adult populations, including those at greatest risk.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
114
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Chih-Hsiang "Jason" Yang, PhD
- Phone Number: 803-777-1025
- Email: cy11@mailbox.sc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Laura Phillips, B.S.
- Phone Number: 4848959788
- Email: lp32@email.sc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
South Carolina
-
Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29208
- Recruiting
- University of South Carolina
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- African American ages 60 and above
- Mild symptoms of cognitive decline or MCI
- Physically inactive or insufficiently active (based on the 2018 US guidelines)
- Adequate hearing and visual ability to complete study tasks and assessments
- English proficiency
- Medically stable with or without medication
- Capable of providing informed consent
- Willing to be randomized to one of the two groups
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of ADRD or other brain abnormalities (e.g., strokes, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease
- Clinical diagnosis of psychiatric disorders (i.e., depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder)
- Unable to walk independently (i.e., need caregiver's assistance) 4) Plan to have surgery or relocate outside the area within the next 6 months
5) Currently participate in other studies involving physical activity, mindfulness, or cognitive training
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mindful walking
Complete a 24-session outdoor mindful walking intervention over 3 months
|
Participate in 24 sessions of outdoor mindful walking on a local walking trail over three months
|
|
Other: Delayed mindful walking group
Option to complete a delayed 24-session mindful walking
|
Participate in 24 sessions of outdoor mindful walking on a local walking trail over three months
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cognitive Function as assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
MoCA is a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction.
It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation.
|
Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
|
Everyday Cognition as assessed by the NIH Mobile Toolbox
Time Frame: Baseline, 18, 24 weeks follow-up (4 days each), Weeks 12 and 13 (14 days)
|
The NIH Mobile Toolbox is a smartphone-based, ultra-brief cognitive assessments to measure different domains of cognition using the smartphone screen.
|
Baseline, 18, 24 weeks follow-up (4 days each), Weeks 12 and 13 (14 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Quality of Life as assessed by the EuroQol 5 dimensions and 5 levels questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
The EuroQol 5 dimensions and 5 levels survey (EQ-5D-5L) is a self-assessed, health related, quality of life questionnaire.
The questionnaire measures quality of life on a 5-component scale including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, ranging from 11111 (best) to 55555 (worst).
|
Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
|
Subjective Physical Activity Levels as assessed by the CHAMPS (Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
The CHAMPS self-report questionnaire assesses weekly frequency and duration of a variety of lifestyle physical activities that are meaningful and appropriate for older adults
|
Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
|
Device-based Physical Activity Levels as assessed by the activPAL Accelerometer
Time Frame: Weeks 12 and 13 (14 days)
|
The activPAL is a small, slim activity monitor that uses an accelerometer to measure limb position and activity.
It's worn on the thigh and uses algorithms to determine body posture, including moving, standing, and sitting.
|
Weeks 12 and 13 (14 days)
|
|
Mindfulness Level as assessed by the Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale and Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
Use Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) is a 15-item self-report survey that measures mindfulness in general and in specific day-to-day circumstances.
Each MAAS scores can range from 1 to 6. Higher scores indicate greater mindfulness; The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) has 39 self-reported items.
It measures five mindfulness facets, including Observing, Describing, Acting with awareness, Non-judgmental, and Non-reactive.
The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (never or very rarely true) to 5 (very often or always true).
|
Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
|
Overall Health Status as assessed by the SF-36 self-report survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
The SF-36 is a 36-item survey that measures eight domains of health status.
The survey is designed to capture adult patients' perceptions of their own health and well-being.
The score range is 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better health status.
|
Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
|
Mobility as assessed by the 10-meter walk test
Time Frame: Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
The 10-meter walk test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in meters per second over a short distance.
It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function.
|
Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
|
Perceived Stress as assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures psychological stress.
The PSS-10 asks respondents to rate statements about their feelings and thoughts.
Each question is scored from 0 (never) to 5 (very often) with a total possible score range of 0 to 40.
|
Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
|
Depressive Symptoms as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item questionnaire that measures the severity of depressive symptoms in the general population.
The CES-D has a possible range of scores from zero to 60. Higher scores indicate the presence of more symptomatology.
|
Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
|
Sleep Quality as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-reported questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and quantity.
It has seven components, each rated from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty).
It has a global score range of 0 to 21.
Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
|
Baseline, 12,18,24 weeks follow-up
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Height as measured from the top of the person's head to the heel using digital stadiometer
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Use the PhenX Toolkit protocol and measure height in duplicates.
The height measurements is taken to the nearest 0.1 cm.
A third measurement is conducted if the first two measurements differ by more than 1.0 cm.
|
Baseline
|
|
Weight as measured using a digital floor scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Use the PhenX Toolkit protocol and measure weight in duplicates.
The weight measure is conducted to the nearest 100 grams.
If the first two measurements differ by more than 200 grams or 0.25 pounds, a third measurement should be taken.
|
Baseline
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI) as calculated by the height and weight measures
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Body mass index (BMI) is a value derived from the mass and height of a person.
The BMI is defined as the body mass divided by the square of the body height.
Major adult BMI classifications are underweight (under 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 to 24.9), overweight (25 to 29.9), and obese (30 or more).
|
Baseline
|
|
Waist Circumference as measured using a tape measure at the uppermost lateral border of the ilium
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Waist circumference is a more direct measure of central obesity.
It's a marker for visceral fat, which plays a role in the development of many chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
|
Baseline
|
|
Systolic and diastolic blood pressures as measured using the automatic arm blood pressure monitor
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Blood pressure is the pressure, measured in millimeters of mercury, within the major arterial system of the body.
It is conventionally separated into systolic and diastolic determinations.
Systolic pressure is the maximum blood pressure during contraction of the ventricles; diastolic pressure is the minimum pressure recorded just prior to the next contraction.
|
Baseline
|
|
Health Literacy as assessed by a validated survey item
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Use one valid item from the Wallace et al. (2006) publication - Screening Items to Identify Patients with Limited Health Literacy Skills.
The study concluded that a single question is sufficient to identify patients with limited health literacy.
|
Baseline
|
|
Grip Strength as measured using the digital dynamometer
Time Frame: Baseline
|
This dynamometer is designed for home, sport, and clinical use to measure grip strength.
It has a high precision power gauging that gives an accurate digital reading of gripping power.
The handle can be adjusted up or down to get an ideal grasp.
|
Baseline
|
|
Daily Functioning as assessed by the Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale assesses a person's ability to perform daily living tasks.
The scale measures eight domains, including: Using the telephone, Shopping, Food preparation, Housekeeping, Laundry, Transport, Medication, Finances.
The scale has eight items and takes about 10 to 15 minutes to administer.
The summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent) for women, and 0 through 5 for men.
|
Baseline
|
|
Social Support as assess by the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
PSSS is a 12-item questionnaire that uses a 7-level scoring method (from 1 = "disagree" to 7 = "extremely agree").
The total score ranges from 12 to 84 points.
Higher scores indicate a higher level of the individual's perception of social support.
|
Baseline
|
|
Medication Use as assessed using the general health needs survey
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The general health needs survey question was developed and validated in 2014 by the UnitedHealthcare to screen for health status.
The survey asks respondents if they used prescription drugs for any reason in the past 12 months or lifetime and what are the prescription drugs.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chih-Hsiang "Jason" Yang, PhD, University of South Carolina
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 16, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 15, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 12, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
October 16, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 16, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 12, 2023
Last Verified
October 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00123487
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Function
-
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health...Active, not recruitingCognitive Function | Physical FunctionTaiwan
-
Maastricht UniversityWageningen University and Research; Top Institute Food and Nutrition; Netherlands...TerminatedCognitive Function | Ageing | Physical Function | Mitochondrial FunctionNetherlands
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawActive, not recruitingCognitive Function | Executive FunctionPoland
-
University Hospital, GenevaCompletedCognitive Function | Falls | Physical FunctionSwitzerland
-
University of FloridaNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedCognitive Function | Older Adults | Physical FunctionUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Terminated
-
Örebro University, SwedenActive, not recruitingCognitive FunctionSweden
-
Radicle ScienceCompletedCognitive FunctionUnited States
-
Radicle ScienceCompletedCognitive FunctionUnited States
-
Radicle ScienceCompletedCognitive FunctionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Mindful walking activity
-
Clemson UniversityCompleted
-
Clemson UniversityPrisma Health-Upstate; YMCACompleted
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompleted
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingStress, Psychological | Cognitive DeclineUnited States
-
Ye ZhiyinCompletedDepression, Anxiety | Mindful Walking MeditationChina
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompletedSchizophrenia | Exercise | ConditionTaiwan
-
Clemson UniversityRecruiting
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)CompletedPatellofemoral Pain Syndrome | Patellofemoral Pain (PFPS) | Patellofemoral Pain | Patellofemoral Pain, PFPUnited States
-
Swansea UniversityMedical University of South Carolina; Charles University, Czech Republic; Radboud... and other collaboratorsCompletedControl Condition | Body Scan Meditation | Loving-Kindness Meditation | Mindful Breathing Meditation | Mindful Walking MeditationUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, ToursUnknown